Using Rasch analysis to examine the item-level psychometrics of the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scales

References

• An, X., Yung, Y.-F. 2014. Item response theory: what it is and how you can use the IRT procedure to apply it. Paper SAS364-2014. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bagatto, M.P., Moodie, S.T., Seewald, R.C., Bartlett, D.J., Scollie, S.D. 2011. A critical review of audiological outcome measures for infants and children. Trends in Amplification, 15: 23–33. doi: 10.1177/1084713811412056
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagatto, M.P., Scollie, S.D. 2013. Validation of the parents’ evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) rating scale. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24: 121–125. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.2.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, F.B. 1985. The basics of item response theory. Portsmouth, N.H: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, B.A., Kenworthy, M.H., Walker, E.A. 2011. How we do it: employment of listening-development criteria during assessment of infants who use cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants International, 12: 57–59. doi: 10.1179/146701010X486543
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bass-Ringdahl, S.M. 2010. The relationship of audibility and the development of canonical babbling in young children with hearing impairment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15(3): 287–310. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enq013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylor, C., Hula, W., Donovan, N.J., Doyle, P.J., Kendall, D., Yorkston, K. 2011 . An introduction to item response theory and Rasch models for speech-language pathologists. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20: 243–259.
   Google Scholar
• Cardon, G., Sharma, A. 2013. Central auditory maturation and behavioral outcome in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder who use cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology, 52: 577–586. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.799786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W.H., Lenderking, W., Jin, Y., Wyrwich, K.W., Gelhorn, H., Revicki, D.A. 2014. Is Rasch model analysis applicable in small sample size pilot studies for assessing item characteristics? An example using PROMIS pain behavior item bank data. Quality of Life Research, 23: 485–493. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0487-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C., Hill, M. 2005. The parents’ evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) rating scale. Chatswood, New South Wales: Australian Hearing.
   Google Scholar
• Colletti, L., Mandalà, M., Colletti, V. 2012. Cochlear implants in children younger than 6 months. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 147: 139–146. doi: 10.1177/0194599812441572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coninx, F., Weichbold, V., Tsiakpini, L. 2003. LittlEARS auditory questionnaire. Innsbruck: MED-EL.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, B.G., Odon, S.L. 2013. Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79: 135–144. doi: 10.1177/001440291307900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollaghan, C.A. 2007. The handbook for evidence-based practice in communication disorders. Baltimore, MD: Brooks Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhard, G. 2013. Invariant measurement: using Rasch models in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erber, N. 1982. Auditory training. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, D.J., Jung, J. 2012. Monitoring progress in vocal development in young cochlear implant recipients: relationships between speech samples and scores from the Conditioned Assessment of Speech Production (CASP). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21: 313–328. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0110)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A.P. 2009. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gantz, B.J., Rubinstein, J.T., Tyler, R.S., Teagle, H.F., Cohen, N.L., Waltzman, S.B., et al. 2000. Long-term results of cochlear implants in children with residual hearing. Annals of Otolaryngology, Rhinology, and Laryngology-Supplement, 185: 33–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IBM Corp. Released. 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Jerger, S., Damian, M.F., Mills, C., Bartlett, J., Tye-Murray, N., Abdi, H. 2013. Effect of perceptual load on semantic access by speech in children. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 56: 388–403. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0186)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishon-Rabin, L., Taitelbaum, R., Elichai, O., Maimon, D., Debyiat, D., Chazan, N. et al. 2001. Developmental aspects of the IT-MAIS in normal-hearing babies. Israeli Journal of Speech and Hearing, 23: 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J.M. 1994. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7: 328.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J.M. 2002. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3: 85–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre, J.M. 2010. Winsteps® (Version 7.5) [Computer Software]. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com. Available from http://www.winsteps.com/
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F.M., Novick, M.R. 1968. Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Mallinson, T. 2011. Rasch analysis of repeated measures. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 25: 1317.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, I.H.Y., Lee, K.Y.S., Lam, J.H.S., van Hasselt, C.A., Tong, M.C.F. 2016. An application of item response theory and the Rasch model in speech recognition test materials. American Journal of Audiology, 25: 142–152. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJA-15-0025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oller, D.K., Eilers, R.E. 1988. The role of audition in infant babbling. Child Development, 59: 441–449. doi: 10.2307/1130323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M.K., Singh, G. 2006. Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends in Amplification, 10: 29–59. doi: 10.1177/108471380601000103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rasch, G. 1960/1980. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, A.M., Renshaw, J.J., Berry, S.W. 1991. Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing-impaired children. The American Journal of Otology, 12: 144–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, E.V. 2005. Effect of item redundancy on rasch item and person estimates. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6: 147–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uhler, K., Gifford, R.H. 2014. Current trends in pediatric cochlear implant candidate selection and postoperative follow-up. American Journal of Audiology, 23: 309–325. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJA-13-0067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B.D. 1999. Fundamental measurement for psychology. In: Embretson, SE, Hershberger, SL (eds.) The new rules of measurement: what every psychologist and educator should know. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum, p. 65–104.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B.D., Linacre, J.M. 1989. Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70: 857–860.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B.D., Linacre, J.M. 1994. Reasonable item mean-square fit value. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8: 370.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B.D., Stone, M.H. 1999. Measurement essentials. 2nd ed. Wilmington: Wide Range, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., Soli, S.D., Wang, K., Meng, J., Meng, Z., Xu, K. 2009. A normative study of early prelingual auditory development. Audiology and Neurotology, 14: 214–222. doi: 10.1159/000189264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman-Phillips, S., Osberger, M.J., Robbins, A.M. 2001. Infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration scale. Sylmar, CA: Advanced Bionics Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman-Phillips, S., Robbins, A.M., Osberger, M.J. 2000. Assessing cochlear implant benefit in very young children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology – Supplement, 185: 42–43. doi: 10.1177/0003489400109S1217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar