New Brutalism, Again

References

• Banham, Reyner, Rodney Wilson, and J. Cooper, directors. 1979. Fathers of Pop. UK. Available online: http://artsonfilm.wmin.ac.uk/filmsuk.php (accessed April 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Banham, Reyner. 1955. “The New Brutalism.” Architectural Review 118: 354–61.
   Google Scholar
• Banham, Reyner. 1956. “This is Tomorrow.” Architectural Review 120: 186–8.
   Google Scholar
• Banham, Reyner. 1966. The New Brutalism: Ethic or Aesthetic? London: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banham, Reyner. 1968. “Revenge of the Picturesque: English Architectural Polemics, 1945–1965.” In Concerning Architecture: Essays on Architectural Writers and Writing presented to Nikolaus Pevsner, edited by J. Summerson, 265–73. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Bayley, Stephen. 1980. “Crosby, Theo.” In Contemporary Architects, edited by M. Emmanuel, 177–9. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, Christine M. 2006. “An Encounter with History: The Postwar Debate Between the English Journals of Architectural Review and Architectural Design (1945–1960).” Paper presented at Team 10: Keeping the Language of Modern Architecture Alive, conference proceedings, Delft, January 5–6, 2006. Available online: http://www.team10online.org/research/papers/delft2/boyer.pdf (accessed April 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, Louise. 1997. Interview with Peter Smithson. National Life Story Collection: Architects’ Lives. Available online: https://sounds.bl.uk/Oral-history/Architects-Lives (accessed April 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, Anne. 2006. Matthew. Philadelphia, PA: Paul Dry Books.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, Theo. 1991. “Inauguration Speech.” Royal College of Art, London, October. Box 26, Theo Crosby Archive, Design Archive University of Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, Theo. 1956. “This is Tomorrow.” Architectural Design 26, no. 10: 335–6.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, Theo, editor. 1956. This is Tomorrow. Exhibition catalog. London: Whitechapel Art Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, Theo, Alison Smithson, and Peter Smithson. 1955. “The New Brutalism.” Architectural Design 25, no. 1: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, Theo, editor. 1960. Uppercase 3. London: Whitefriars.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, Theo, editor. 1961. Architecture of Technology. London: Whitefriars.
   Google Scholar
• Gutkind, E. A. 1953. “How other Peoples Dwell and Build.” Architectural Design 23, no. 2: 31–4.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, Gilbert. 1975. Martienssen and the International Style: The Modern Movement in South African Architecture. Cape Town: A. A. Balkema).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Iain, and Jessica Holland. 2016. The Architecture of Edwin Maxwell Fry and Jane Drew. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks, Charles. 1977. “Venturi et al are Almost all Right.” Architectural Design 47, no. 7–8: 468–9.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Philip. 1954. “School at Hunstanton, Norfolk, by Alison and Peter Smithson.” Architectural Review 116: 148–64.
   Google Scholar
• Parnell, Steve. 2012. “AR’s and AD’s Post-War Editorial Policies: The Making of Modern Architecture in Britain.” Journal of Architecture 17: 763–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentagram. 1978. Living by Design. London: Pentagram Design.
   Google Scholar
• Pevsner, Nikolaus. 1946. “The Architecture of Mannerism.” In The Mint, edited by Geoffrey Grigson, 116–38. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, D., editor. 1990. The Independent Group: Post-war Britain and the Aesthetic of Plenty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, Colin. 1947. “The Mathematics of the Ideal Villa: Palladio and Le Corbusier Compared.” Architectural Review 101: 101–14.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, Raphael. 1994. Theatre of Memory. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, Alison and Peter Smithson. 1957. “The New Brutalism: Alison and Peter Smithson Answer the Criticism on the Opposite Page.” Architectural Design 27, no. 4: 113.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, Alison and Peter Smithson. 1960. “The Rebirth of Japanese Architecture.” Architectural Design 33, no. 2: 55–81.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, Alison and Peter Smithson. 1977. “AD Profile: Milbank.” Architectural Design 47, no. 7–8: 529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithson, Alison. 1953. “House in Soho, London.” Architectural Design 23, no. 12: 342.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, Alison and Peter Smithson. 1967. Urban Structuring: Studies of Alison & Peter Smithson. London: Studio Vista.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, Alison and Peter Smithson. 1973. Without Rhetoric: an architectural aesthetic, 1955–1972. London: Studio Vista.
   Google Scholar
• Tafuri, Manfredo. 1989 [1976]. Theories and History of Architecture, translated by Giorgio Verrecchia. London: Granada.
   Google Scholar
• Taut, Bruno. 1936. Fundamentals of Japanese Architecture. Tokyo: Kokusai Bunka.
   Google Scholar
• Taut, Bruno. 1929. Modern Architecture. London, Japan: A. & C. Boni.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel, Dirk. 2015. “Between Brutalists. The Banham Hypothesis and the Smithson Way of Life.” The Journal of Architecture 20, no. 2: 293–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidler, Antony. 2011. “Another Brick in the Wall.” October 136: 105–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wittkower, Rudolf. 1998 [1949]. Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism. 3rd ed. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar