Fell Point Technology from Mendoza Province in Western Argentina

References

• Anderson, D. G. 2015. “Documenting Early Lithic Technologies in South America.” Chungará 47 (1): 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, J. 1969. “A Comparison of South Chilean and Ecuatorial ‘Fishtail’ Projectile Points.” Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers 40: 52–71.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, E. 1979. “The Basics of Biface Knapping in the Eastern Fluted Point Tradition. A Manual for Flintknappers and Lithic Analysts.” Archaeology of Eastern North America 7 (1): 1–180.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, E. 2010. “Flake Removal Sequence and Cultural Inference. A Solutrean Perspective.” In Experiments and Interpretation of Traditional Technologies: Essays in Honor of Errett Callahan, edited by H. G. Nami, 561–659. Buenos Aires: Ediciones de Arqueología Contemporánea.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, L. L., and H. G. Nami. 2011. “A New Fishtail Point Find from South Brazil.” Current Research in the Pleistocene 28: 104–107.
   Google Scholar
• Dumbar, J. S. 2012. “The Search for Paleoindian Contexts in Florida and the Adjacent Southeast.” Ph.D. dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
   Google Scholar
• Femenías, J., H. G. Nami, A. Florines, and A. Toscano. 2011. “GIS Archaeological Site Record and Remarks on Paleoindian Finds in the Rio Negro River Basin, Central Uruguay.” Current Research in the Pleistocene 28: 98–101.
   Google Scholar
• Flegenheimer, N., and C. Weitzel. 2017. “Fishtail Points from the Pampas of South America: Their Variability and Life Histories.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 45: 142–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2016.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, A. 1995. “Agua de la Cueva Rockshelter and Its Relationship to the Early Peopling of Central West Argentina.” Current Research in the Pleistocene 12: 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• García, A. 1999. “La extinción de la megafauna pleistocénica en los Andes Centrales Argentino-Chilenos.” Revista Española de Antropología Americana 29: 9–30.
   Google Scholar
• García, A. 2003. “On the Coexistence of Man and Extinct Pleistocene Megafauna at Gruta del Indio (Argentina).” Radiocarbon 45 (1): 33–39. doi: 10.1017/S0033822200032379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, A. 2004. Los primeros pobladores de los Andes Centrales Argentinos: una mirada a los estudios sobre los grupos cazadores-recolectores tempranos de San Juan y Mendoza. Mendoza: Zeta Editores.
   Google Scholar
• García, A., and H. Lagiglia. 1999a. “Avances en el estudio del registro pleistocénico tardío de la Gruta del Indio (Mendoza).” Cuadernos del Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano 18: 167–174.
   Google Scholar
• García, A., and H. Lagiglia. 1999b. “A 30,000 Year Old Megafauna Dung Layer from Gruta del Indio (Mendoza, Argentina).” Current Research in the Pleistocene 16: 116–118.
   Google Scholar
• García-Bárcena, J. 1980. “Una punta acanalada de la Cueva de Los Grifos, Ocozocoautla Chis.” Cuadernos de Trabajo 17, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, México.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P. B. 1997. “Technology and Variation in Arrow Design among the Agta of Northeastern Luzon.” In Projectile Technology, edited by H. Knecht, 267–286. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jodry, M. A. 1998. “The Possible Design of Folsom Ultrathin Knife Bifaces as Fillet Knives for Jerky Production.” Current Research in the Pleistocene 15: 75–77.
   Google Scholar
• Knecht, H. 1997. “Projectile Points of Bone, Antler, and Stone: Experimental Explorations of Manufacture and Use.” In Projectile Technology, edited by H. Knecht, 191–207. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lafayette, L. M., and G. M. Smith. 2012. “Use-Wear Traces on Experimental (Replicated) and Prehistoric Stemmed Points from the Great Basin.” Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 32 (2): 141–160.
   Google Scholar
• Lagiglia, H. 2002. “Arqueología prehistórica del sur Mendocino y sus relaciones con el centro oeste Argentino.” In Entre Montañas y Desiertos: Arqueología del sur Mendocino, edited by A. Gil and G. Neme, 43–64. Buenos Aires: Sociedad Argentina de Antropología.
   Google Scholar
• Laguens, A., E. A. Pautassi, G. M. Sario, and G. R. Cattáneo. 2007. “ELS1, A Fishtail Projectile Point Site from Central Argentina.” Current Research in the Pleistocene 24: 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Long, A., P. Martin, and H. Lagiglia. 1998. “Ground Sloth Extinction and Human Occupation at Gruta Del Indio, Argentina.” Radiocarbon 40: 693–700. doi: 10.1017/S0033822200018634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, C. E., and A. Ranere. 2008. “Diversidad Cultural durante el Pleistoceno Tardío y el Holoceno Temprano en la Baja Centro América y en el Noroeste de Suramérica.” In Ecología Histórica: Interacciones Sociedad-Ambiente a Distintas Escalas Socio-Temporales, edited by C. E. López, and G. A. Ospina, 45–54. Pereira: Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Universidad del Cauca, Sociedad Colombiana de Arqueología.
   Google Scholar
• Loponte, D., M. Okumura, and M. Carbonera. 2016. “New Records of Fishtail Projectile Points from Brazil and Its Implications for Its Peopling.” Journal of Lithic Studies 3 (1): 63–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, G., and M. A. Gutiérrez. 2015. “Arqueología del río Quequén Grande.” Ciencia Hoy 24: 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Oakes, W. 1986. “Early Man Projectile Points and Lithic Technology in the Ecuadorean Sierra.” In New Evidence for the Pleistocene Peopling of the America, edited by A. Bryan, 281–294. Orono: Center for the Study of the Early Man.
   Google Scholar
• Miotti, L. 1992. “Paleoindian Occupations at Piedra Museo Locality, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina.” Current Research in the Pleistocene 9: 30–13.
   Google Scholar
• Miotti, L., and R. Cattaneo. 1997. “Lithic Technology at 13000 Years Ago in Southern Patagonia.” Current Research in the Pleistocene 14: 62–65.
   Google Scholar
• Miotti, L., D. Hermo, E. Terranova, and R. Blanco. 2015. “Edenes en el desierto. Señales de caminos y lugares en la historia de la colonización de Patagonia argentina.” Antipoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología 23: 139–161. doi:10.7440/antipoda23.2015.08.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 1987. “Cueva del Medio: Perspectivas Arqueológicas para la Patagonia Austral.” Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia 17: 71–106.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 1992. “Nuevos datos en relación a las puntas de proyectil paleoindias encontradas en el Cono Sur (Neuquén, Argentina).” Palimpsesto. Revista de Arqueología 1: 71–74.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 1997. “Investigaciones actualísticas para discutir aspectos técnicos de los cazadores-recolectores del tardiglacial: El problema Clovis-Cueva Fell.” Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia 25: 152–186.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 2003. “Experimentos para explorar la secuencia de reducción Fell de la Patagonia Austral.” Magallania 30: 107–138.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 2010a. “Tecnología paleoindia de Sudamérica: Nuevos experimentos y observaciones para conocer la secuencia de reducción Fell.” Orígenes 9: 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 2010b. “Experiments to Understand North and South American Late Pleistocene Lithic Reduction Sequences: An Actualistic and Comparative Study.” In Experiments and Interpretation of Traditional Technologies: Essays in Honor of Errett Callahan, edited by H. G. Nami, 203–253. Buenos Aires: Ediciones de Arqueología Contemporánea.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 2013. “Archaelogy, Paleoindian Research and Lithic Technology in the Middle Negro River, Central Uruguay.” Archaeological Discovery 1: 1–22. doi: 10.4236/ad.2013.11001
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 2014a. “Arqueología del último milenio del Pleistoceno en el Cono Sur de Sudamérica, puntas de proyectil y observaciones sobre tecnología Paleoindia en el Nuevo Mundo.” In Peuplement et Modalités d’Occupation de l’Amérique du Sud: l’Apport de la Technologie Lithique, edited by M. Farías and A. Lourdeau, 279–336. Prigonrieux: @rchéo-éditions.com and Impr. Copy-média.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 2014b. “Secuencias de reducción bifaciales Paleoindias y puntas Fell en el Valle del Ilaló (Ecuador): Observaciones para comprender la tecnologia lítica Pleistocénica en Sudamérica.” In Peuplement et Modalités d’Occupation de l’Amérique du Sud: l’Apport de la Technologie Lithique, edited by M. Farías and A. Lourdeau, 179–220. Prigonrieux: @rchéo-éditions.com and Impr. Copymédia.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 2015a. “Experimental Observations on Some Non-Optimal Materials from Southern South America.” Lithic Technology 40 (2): 128–146. doi: 10.1179/2051618515Y.0000000004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 2015b. “New Records and Observations on Paleo-American Artifacts from Cerro Largo, Northeastern Uruguay and a Peculiar Case of Reclaimed Fishtail Points.” Archaeological Discovery 3: 114–127. doi:10.4236/ad.2015.33011.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 2016. “Paleo American Finds from Venezuela: Evidence to Discuss the Spread of Fell Points and the Peopling of Northern South America.” Revista Cadernos do Ceom 29 (45): 212–219. doi: 10.22562/2016.45.08
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 2017a. “Hallazgos Paleoindios en Dolores, Departamento de Soriano, Uruguay.” Cuadernos del Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano 26 (1): 77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 2017b. “Exploring the Manufacture of Bifacial Stone Tools from the Middle Rio Negro Basin, Uruguay: An Experimental Approach.” Ethnoarchaeology 9 (1): 53–80. doi: 10.1080/19442890.2017.1286757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. 2017c. “Silcrete as a Valuable Resource for Stone Tool Manufacture and Its Use by Paleo-American Hunter-gatherers in Southeastern South America.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 15: 539–560. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G. n.d. “Further Data to Enhancing the Knowledge on Fell Point Morphology and Technology from South-Eastern South America.” Unpublished manuscript in possession of the author.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G., and A. Castro. 2014. “Fishtail Points, Technology and Microwear Analysis from the Negro River Basin, Uruguay.” Archaeological Discovery 2: 65–70. doi:10.4236/ad.2014.23008.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G., and M. T. Civalero. 2017. “Distinctive Unifacial Technology during the Early Holocene in Southern South America.” Archaeological Discovery 5: 101–115. doi:10.4236/ad.2017.53007.
   Google Scholar
• Nami, H. G., A. Florines, and A. Toscano. 2018. “New Paleoindian Finds, Further Fell Points Data, and Technological Observations from Uruguay: Implications for the Human Peopling in Southeastern South America.” Archaeological Discovery 6 (1): 21–37. doi:10.4236/ad.2018.61002.
   Google Scholar
• Nuñez, L., R. Casamiquela, V. Schiappacasse, H. Niemeyer, and C. Villagrán. 1994. “Cuenca de Taguatagua en Chile: El ambiente del Pleistoceno y ocupaciones humanas.” Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 67: 503–519.
   Google Scholar
• Patané Aráoz, C., and H. G. Nami. 2014. “The First Paleoindian Fishtail Point Find in Salta Province, Northwestern Argentina.” Archaeological Discovery 2: 26–30. doi:10.4236/ad.2014.22004.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, G. 2017. “Bridging the Gap: An Updated Overview of Clovis across Middle America and Its Techno-Cultural Relation with Fluted Point Assemblages from South America.” PaleoAmerica 3 (3): 203–230. doi:10.1080/20555563. doi: 10.1080/20555563.2017.1328953
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, G., and P. Bostrom. 1998. “A New Fluted Stemmed Point from Belize and Its Implication for a Circum-Caribbean Paleoindian Culture Area.” Current Research in the Pleistocene 15: 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ranere, A. J., and C. E. López. 2007. “Cultural Diversity in Late Pleistocene/Early Holocene Populations in Northwest South America.” International Journal of South American Archaeology 1: 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Raup, J. W. 1976. “Some Experiments with Replica Projectile Points Used as Arrow Points.” In The APE. Experimental Archaeology Papers 4, edited by E. Callahan, 281–303. Richmond: Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Virginia Commonwealth University.
   Google Scholar
• Root, M. 1993. “Analyses of Stone Tools and Flaking Debris”. In Site 32DU955A: Folsom Occupation of the Knife River Flint Primary Source Area. Phase III (Part I) Archaeological Data Recovery at Lake Ilo National Wildlife Refuge, Dunn County, North Dakota: Interim Report for 1992–1993 Investigations at 32DU955A, edited by M. Root, 179–227. Research Report 22. Pullman: Washington State University.
   Google Scholar
• Schobinger, J. 1971. “Una punta tipo ‘cola de pescado’ de la Crucesita (Mendoza).” Anales de Arqueología y Etnología 26: 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano, A. 1947. Los aborígenes argentinos. Buenos Aires: Nova.
   Google Scholar
• Stapert, D. 1976. “Some Natural Surface Modifications on Flint in the Netherlands.” Palaeohistoria XVVIIII: 8–41.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, R. 2015. “The Paleoamerican Occupation of the Plains of Uruguay: Technology, Adaptations, and Mobility.” PaleoAmerica 1: 88–104. doi: 10.1179/2055556314Z.00000000010
   Google Scholar
• Weitzel, C., N. Flegenheimer, M. Colombo, and J. Martínez. 2014. “Breakage Patterns on Fishtail Projectile Points: Experimental and Archaeological Cases.” Ethnoarchaeology 6 (2): 81–102. doi: 10.1179/1944289014Z.00000000017
   Google Scholar
• Yataco Capcha, J., and H. G. Nami. 2016. “A Re-Evaluation of Paleo-American Artifacts from Jaywamachay Rockshelter, Ayacucho Valley, Peru.” PaleoAmerica 2: 368–372. doi: 10.1080/20555563.2016.1199198
   Google Scholar