The graphic design project: employing structured and critical reflection to guide student learning

References

• Barron, B. J. S., D. L. Schwartz, N. J. Vye, A. Moore, A. Petrosino, L. Zech, and J. D. Bransford. 1998. “Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 7: 271–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, Susan. 2002. “Learning about Design in Context: An Investigation of Learners’ Interpretations and use of Real-life Cases within a Constructivist Learning Environment Created to Support Authentic Design Activities”, PhD diss., University of Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Best, Kathryn. 2006. Design Management: Managing Design Strategy, Process and Implementation. Lausanne: AVA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C., E. Soloway, R. W. Marz, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdail, and A. Palincsar. 1991. “Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning.” Educational Psychologist 26 (3 & 4): 369–398.10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 1990. “Assessment and the Promotion of Academic Values.” Studies in Higher Education 15 (1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, David, Rosemary Keogh, and David Walker, eds. 1985. Reflection, Turning Experience into Learning. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, John D., and Daniel L. Schwartz. 1999. “Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal with a Multiple Implications.” Review of Research in Education 24: 61–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, John. 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at University, edited by Heather Eggins. 2nd ed. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, J. 1980. “Shaping at the Point of Utterance.” In Reinventing the Rhetorical Tradition, edited by A. Freedman and I. Pringle, 61–66. Conway, AR: L & S Books for the Canadian Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Amoung Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W., Vicki L. Plano Clark, Michelle L. Gutmann, and William E. Hanson. 2003. “Advanced Mixed Methods Research Designs.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research, edited by Abbas Tashakkori and Charles Teddlie, 209–240. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. 2007. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Allen, and Anna Reid. 2000. “Uncovering Problematics in Design Education - Learning and the Design Entity.” Centre for Learning and Teaching in Art and Design, Royal College of Art, The London Institute Accessed April 13. http://www.arts.ac.uk/cltad/resea/adpapers.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Design Council. 2005. “The ‘Double Diamond’ Design Process Model.” Design Council. Accessed May 22, 2010. http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/about-design/How-designers-work/The-design-process/.
   Google Scholar
• Design Council. 2007. Eleven Lessons: Managing Design in Eleven Global Companies. London, UK: Design Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 2006. Understanding Design. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 1997. Describing Design – A Comparison of Paradigms. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kees. 2003. "The Problem of Design Problems." Expertise in Design, Design Thinking Research Symposium 6, University of Technology, Sydney, November 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kees, and Judith Dijkhuis. 1995. “Comparing Paradigms for Describing Design Activity.” Design Studies 16 (2): 261–274.10.1016/0142-694X(94)00012-3
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kees, and I. M. M. J. Reymen. 2004. "Levels of Expertise in Design Education." 2nd International Engineering and Product Design Education Conference, Delft University of Technology, Delft, September 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Ehmann, D. 2004. Futuregraduate: The Role of Assessment within Design Education. Futureground: Monash University, VIC.
   Google Scholar
• Ehmann, D. 2005. "Using Assessment to Engage Graphic Design Students in the Learning Experience.” Making a Difference: 2005 Evaluation and Assessment Conference, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ellmers, Grant. 2014. “Graphic Design Education: Fostering the Conditions for Transfer in a Project-Based and Studio-Based Learning Environment, through a Structured and Critical Approach to Reflective Practice.” Doctor of Philosophy. School of Education, University of Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Eraut, Michael. 1994. Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaye, Tony, and Sue Lillyman. 1997. Learning Journals and Critical Incidents: Reflective Practice for Health Care Professionals. Dinton, England: Quay.
   Google Scholar
• Girk, Mary L., and Keith J. Holyoak. 1983. “Schema Induction and Anological Transfer.” Cognitive Psychology 15: 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatton, Neville, and David Smith. 1995. “Reflection in Teacher Education: Towards Definition and Implementation.” Teaching and Teacher Education 11 (1): 33–49.10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, Jan, and R. Oliver. 1999. “Using Situated Learning and Multimedia to Investigate Higher-Order Thinking.” Journal of Interactive Learning Research 10 (1): 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, Linda A. 1994. “Reflective Writing as a Window on Preservice Teachers’ Thought Processes.” Teaching and Teacher Education 10 (1): 83–93.10.1016/0742-051X(94)90042-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, Alison. 2007. “Reflection Revisited: Perceptions of Reflective Practice in Fashion Learning and Teaching.” Art Design and Communication in Higher Education 5 (3): 179–196.10.1386/adch.5.3.179_1
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. Burke, and Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. “Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come.” Educational Researcher 33 (7): 14–26. doi:10.2307/3700093.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, David, Jan McKay, Kit Sinclair, and Frances Kam Yuet Wong. 2007. “A Four-Category Scheme for Coding and Assessing the Level of Reflection in Written Work.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 1 (1): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Perry D. 1999. “Reopening Inquiry into Cognitive Processes in Writing-to-Learn.” Educational Psychology Review 11 (3): 203–270.10.1023/A:1021913217147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T. D., A. C. Myers, P. J. Feltovich, and H. S. Barrows. 1994. “Using Technology to Assist in Realizing Effective Learning and Instruction: A Principled Approach to the Use of Computers in Collaborative Learning.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3 (3): 227–264.10.1207/s15327809jls0303_2
   Google Scholar
• Kvan, T. 2001. "The Problem in Studio Teaching - Revisiting the Pedagogy of Studio Teaching." 1st ACAE Conference on Architectural Education, National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Lauche, K. 2001. "Heedful Action, Reflection, and Transfer in the Design Process." International Conference on Engineering Design No13, Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Bryan. 2006. How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, Donna M. 2005. Research Methods in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, Jack. 1990. “How Critical Reflection Triggers Transformative Learning.” In Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning, edited by Jack Mezirow, 1–20. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Jennifer A. 1999. Reflection in Learning & Professional Development: Theory and Practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Jennifer, A. 2004. A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Jennifer, A. 2005. "We Seek It Here…A New Perspective on the Elusive Activity of Critical Thinking: A Theoretical and Practical Approach’." Accessed February 18. http://escalate.ac.uk/2041.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Jennifer A. 2006. Learning Journals: A Handbook for Academics, Students and Professional Development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, edited by J. D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N., and Gavriel Salomon. 1988. “Teaching for Transfer.” Educational Leadership 46 (1): 22–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch, Keith F. 1998. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative & Qualitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, Charles M., and Theodore Frick. 1999. “Formative Research: A Methodology for Creating and Improving Design Theories.” In Instructional-Design Theories and Models, edited by Charles M. Reigeluth, 633–652. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Reymen, I.M.M.J. 2003. "Research on Design Reflection: Overview and Directions." 14th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED03), Stockholm, Sweden, August 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Reymen, I. M. M. J. 2001. Improving Design Processes through Structured Reflection: A Domain-Independent Approach. PhD, Institute for Programming research and Algorithmics, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
   Google Scholar
• Reymen, I. M. M. J., D. K. Hammer, P. A. Kroes, J. E. van Aken, C. H. Dorst, M. F. T. Bax, and T. Basten. 2006. “A Domain-Independent Descriptive Design Model and Its Application to Structured Reflection on Design Processes.” Research in Engineering Design 16 (4): 147–173.10.1007/s00163-006-0011-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D.A. 1984. “Problems, Frames and Perspectives on Designing.” Design Studies 5 (3): 132–136.10.1016/0142-694X(84)90002-4
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D.A., and J. Bennett. 1996. “Reflective Conversation with Materials.” In Bringing Design to Software, edited by T. Winograd, 171–189. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D.A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D.A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, Gregory. 1998. “Promoting General Metacognitive Awareness.” Instructional Science 26: 113–125.10.1023/A:1003044231033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, Abbas, and Charles Teddlie. 2003. “Major Issues and Controversies in the Use of Mixed Methods in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, edited by Abbas Tashakkori and Charles Teddlie, 3–50. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, D. 1993. Critical Incidents in Teaching: Developing Professional Judgement. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, Rianne, and Kees Dorst. 1998. “The Reflective Practice of Design Teams.” Design Studies 19 (3): 249–271.10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00011-8
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods Third Edition, Edited by Leonard Bickman and Debra J. Rog. Vol. 5, Applied Social Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar