Los orígenes y destinos de la idea de terceridad en el psicoanálisis contemporáneo

References

• Abraham K (1924). A short study of the development of the libido. In: Selected Papers, 418–501. London: Hogarth, 1942.
   Google Scholar
• Badiou A (1988). L’^etre et l’evenement [Being and the event]. Paris: Seuil. [El ser y el acontecimiento. Buenos Aires: Manantial]
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin M (1963). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Emerson C, translator. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Balint M (1969). Trauma and object relationship. Int J Psychoanal 50:429–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranger M, Baranger W (1961–62). La situación analítica como campo dinámico [The analytic situation as a dynamic field]. Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis 4:3–54.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger M, Baranger W (2004). La teoría del campo [Field theory]. In: Glocer Fiorini L, editor. El otro en la trama intersubjetiva, 145–69. Buenos Aires: Lugar Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger M, Baranger W (2008). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. Int J Psychoanal 89:795–826. [translation of Baranger M, Baranger W (1961–62)]. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00074.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranger M, Baranger W (2009). The work of confluence: Listening and interpreting in the psychoanalytic field. Glocer Fiorini L, editor. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Berenstein I (2001). The link and the other. Int J Psychoanal 82:141–9. doi: 10.1516/PRG4-66T2-NQ80-J6L5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollas C (1979). The transformational object. Int J Psychoanal 60:97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby J (1969). Attachment and loss. London: Hogarth.
   Google Scholar
• Castoriadis C (1978). Psychoanalysis: Project and elucidation. In: Soper K and Ryle MH, translators. Crossroads in the labyrinth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984. [La psychanalyse, projet et élucidation. In: Les carrefours du labyrinthe. Paris: Seuil.] [El psicoanálisis, proyecto y elucidación. Buenos Aires: Nueva Vision, 1992.]
   Google Scholar
• Castoriadis C (1999). Figures of the thinkable. Arnold H, translator. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 2007. [Figures du pensable. Paris: Seuil.] [Figuras de lo pensable. Madrid: Cátedra, 1999.]
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze G (1988). The fold: Leibniz and the baroque. Conley T, translator. London: Athlone, 1993. [Le pli. Paris: Minuit.] [El pliegue. Barcelona: Paidos, 1989.]
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze G, Guattari F (1980). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1987. [Mille plateaux. Paris: Minuit.]
   Google Scholar
• Dunn J (1995). Intersubjectivity in psychoanalysis: A critical review. Int J Psychoanal 76:723–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn RD (1946). Object-relationships and dynamic structure. Int J Psychoanal 27:30–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S (1920). The further development of an active therapy in psycho-analysis. In: Further contributions to the theory and technique of psycho-analysis, 198–217. London: Hogarth, 1926.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. SE 18:65–144.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1923). The ego and the id. SE 19:1–66.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1924). The dissolution of the Oedipus complex. SE 19:171–80.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1925). Some psychical consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes. SE 19:241–58.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1930 [1929]). Civilization and its discontents. SE 21:57–146.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1933 [1931]). Femininity. In: New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. SE 22:112–35.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm E (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
   Google Scholar
• Glocer Fiorini L, editor (2004). El otro en la trama intersubjetiva [The other in the intersubjective fabric]. Buenos Aires: Lugar Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Glocer Fiorini L (2009). Final comments. In: The Work of Confluence. Listening and Interpreting in the Psychoanalytic Field, 229–235. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Green A (2000). The intrapsychic and intersubjective in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal Q 69:1–39. doi: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2000.tb00553.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green A (2003). Key ideas for a contemporary psychoanalysis: Misrecognition and recognition of the unconscious. Weller A, translator. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Green A (2004). Thirdness and psychoanalytic concepts. Psychoanal Q 73:99–135. doi: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00154.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillaumin J (1997). D’objet, sujet devenir [From being an object, becoming a subject]. Rev francé psychanal 61:497–508.
   Google Scholar
• Guillaumin J (2004). El mundo exterior y el nacimiento del sujeto [The external world and the birth of the subject]. In: Glocer Fiorini L, editor. El otro en la trama intersubjetiva, 27–48. Buenos Aires: Lugar Editorial. (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Horney K (1924). Feminine psychology. Kelman H, editor. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967. [Psicolog ıa femenina. Madrid: Alianza, 1977.]
   Google Scholar
• Kancyper L, editor (1999). Volviendo a pensar con Willy y Madeleine Baranger [Thinking again with Willy and Madeleine Baranger]. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editorial Lumen Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Klein M (1952). Developments in psycho-analysis. London: Hogarth.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan J (1953). The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. In: Fink B, translator. Ecrits: A Selection. New York: Norton, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan J (1973). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. Seminar, Book 11. New York: Norton, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas E (1947). Time and the other. Cohen RA, translator. Pittsburgh PA: Duquesne UP, 1969 [Le temps et l’autre. In: Le choix, le monde, l’existence. Grenoble: Arthaud]. [El tiempo y el otro. Barcelona: Paidós, 1993.]
   Google Scholar
• Levine HB, Friedman R (2000). Intersubjectivity and interaction in the analytic relationship: A mainstream view. Psychoanal Q 69:63–92. doi: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2000.tb00555.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell S (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Morin E (1986). La methode III. La connaissance de la connaissance [Method III. Knowledge of knowledge]. Paris: Seuil, 1992. [El método III. El conocimiento del conocimiento. Madrid: Cátedra, 1988.]
   Google Scholar
• Morin E (1990). Introduction á la pensée complexe [Introduction to complex thought]. Paris: Seuil, 2005. [Introducción al pensamiento complejo. Barcelona: Gedisa, 1995.]
   Google Scholar
• Ogden T (1994). The analytical third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. Int J Psychoanal 75:3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik O (1996). The perils of neutrality. Psychoanal Q 65:495–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan HS (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Todorov T (1995). Life in common: An essay in general anthropology. Golsan K, Golsan L, translators. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2001. [La vie commune. Paris: Seuil.] [La vida en común. Madrid: Taurus, 1995.]
   Google Scholar
• Trías E (1991). Lógica del límite [Logic of the limit]. Barcelona: Destino.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott D (1959). The fate of the transitional object. In: Psychoanalytic explorations, 53–78. London: Karnac, 1989.
   Google Scholar