References
- Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010). Jackknife. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 655–660). Sage.
- Aksit, O., McNeal, K. S., Gold, A. U., Libarkin, J. C., & Harris, S. (2017). The influence of instruction, prior knowledge, and values on climate change risk perception among undergraduates. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 550–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21430
- Chinn, C. A., & Buckland, L. A. (2012). Model-based instruction: Fostering change in evolutionary conceptions and in epistemic practices. In K. S. Rosengren, E. M. Evans, S. K. Brem, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 211–232). Oxford University Press.
- Ford, M. J. (2015). Educational implications of choosing “practice” to describe science in the next generation science standards. Science Education, 99(6), 1041–1048. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21188
- George, D., & Mallery, P. (2009). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 16.0 update (9th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Goodhue, D. L., Lewis, W., & Thompson, R. (2012). Does PLS have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data? MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 981–1001. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/41703490
- Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2) , 565–580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-012-0317-1
- JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [ Computer software].
- Kock, N. (2020). WarpPLS user manual (Version 7.0) [ Computer software]. ScriptWarp Systems.
- Lawson, A. E. (1988). The acquisition of biological knowledge during childhood: Cognitive conflict or tabula rasa? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(3), 185–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660250304
- Lockwood, M. (2009). Solar change and climate: An update in the light of the current exceptional solar minimum. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 466(2114), 303–329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2009.0519
- Lombardi, D., Bailey, J. M., Bickel, E. S., & Burrell, S. (2018). Scaffolding scientific thinking: Students’ evaluations and judgments during Earth science knowledge construction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 184–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.008
- Lombardi, D., Bickel, E. S., Bailey, J. M., & Burrell, S. (2018). High school students’ evaluations, plausibility (re) appraisals, and knowledge about topics in Earth science. Science Education, 102(1), 153–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21315
- Lombardi, D., Brandt, C. B., Bickel, E. S., & Burg, C. (2016). Students’ evaluations about climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1392–1414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1193912
- Lombardi, D., Danielson, R. W., & Young, N. (2016). A plausible connection: Models examining the relations between evaluation, plausibility, and the refutation text effect. Learning and Instruction, 44, 74–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.03.003
- Lombardi, D., Nussbaum, E. M., & Sinatra, G. M. (2016). Plausibility judgments in conceptual change and epistemic cognition. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1113134
- Lombardi, D., Sibley, B., & Carroll, K. (2013). What’s the alternative? Using model-evidence link diagrams to weigh alternative models in argumentation. The Science Teacher, 80(5), 50-–55.
- Lombardi, D., Sinatra, G. M., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2013). Plausibility reappraisals and shifts in middle school students’ climate change conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 27, 50–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.001
- Lombardi, D., Uslu, B., & Bailey, J. M. (2020). Extreme weather events and the climate crisis: What is the connection? The Earth Scientist, 36(3), 22–26. https://www.nestanet.org/cms/sites/default/files/journal/Fall20.pdf
- Lombardi, D. (2016). Beyond the controversy: Instructional scaffolds to promote critical evaluation and understanding of Earth science. The Earth Scientist, 32(2), 5–10. https://www.nestanet.org/resources/Documents/Advocacy/TES/2015-2020/Summer16.pdf.
- McGrath, R. E., & Meyer, G. J. (2006). When effect sizes disagree: The case of r and d. Psychological Methods, 11(4), 386–401. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.386
- Medrano, J., Jaffe, J., Lombardi, D., Holzer, M. A., & Roemmele, C. (2020). Students’ scientific evaluations of water resources. Water, 12(7), 2048. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/w12072048
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academy Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/4962
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. http://www.nextgenscience.org/
- Nussbaum, E. M., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2016). The psychology of far transfer from classroom argumentation. In F. Paglieri (Ed.), The psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion (pp. 407–423). College Publications.
- Nussbaum, E. M. (2015). Categorical and nonparametric data analysis: Choosing the best statistical technique. Routledge.
- Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306(5702), 1686–1686. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103618
- Patall, E. A., Hooper, S., Vasquez, A. C., Pituch, K. A., & Steingut, R. R. (2018). Science class is too hard: Perceived difficulty, disengagement, and the role of teacher autonomy support from a daily diary perspective. Learning and Instruction, 58, 220–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.004
- Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. The University of Chicago Press.
- Quenouille, M. H. (1949). On a method of trend elimination. Biometrika, 36(1/2), 75–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/36.1-2.75
- Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2
- Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
- Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
- Sinatra, G. M., & Lombardi, D. (2020). Evaluating sources of scientific evidence and claims in the post-truth era may require reappraising plausibility judgments. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 120–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1730181
- Smith, R. J. (2019). P > 0.05: The incorrect interpretation of “not significant” results is a significant problem. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 172(4), 521–527. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24092
- Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
- Thompson, B. (2003). Understanding reliability and coefficient alpha, really. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Score reliability (pp. 3–30). SAGE Publications.
- Tukey, J. W. (1958). A problem of Berkson, and minimum variance orderly estimators. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29(2), 588–592. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177706637
- U.S. Global Change Research Program. (2009). Climate literacy: The essential principles of climate science. http://downloads.globalchange.gov/Literacy/climate_literacy_highres_english.pdf
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes ( A. Kozulin, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
- Wasserstein, R. L., Schirm, A. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2019). Moving to a world beyond “p < 0.05”. American Statistician, 73(S1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913
- Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
- Zangori, L., Peel, A., Kinslow, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Sadler, T. D. (2017). Student development of model-based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio-scientific issues unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1249–1273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21404