Evaluation of corneal epithelial remodeling after conventional versus trans-epithelial photorefractive keratectomy for Myopia

References

• Gonzalez-Andrades M, Argüeso P, Gipson I. Corneal anatomy. In: Alió J, Alió del Barrio J Arnalich-Montiel F, editors. Corneal Regeneration. Essentials in ophthalmology. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gipson IK, Stepp MA. Anatomy and cell biology of the cornea, superficial limbus, and conjunctiva. In: Albert D, Miller J, Azar D Young L, editors. Albert and Jakobiec’s Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, et al. Epithelial thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(6):571–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylegała E, Teper S, Nowińska AK, et al. Anterior segment imaging: Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography versus time-domain optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(8):1410–1414. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang ES, Schallhorn JM, Randleman JB. Utility of regional epithelial thickness measurements in corneal evaluations. SurvOphthalmol. 2020;65(2):187–204. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Reinstein DZ, Nitter T, et al. Epithelial thickness mapping in keratoconic corneas: repeatability and agreement between CSO MS-39, Heidelberg Anterion, and Optovue Avanti OCT devices. J Refract Surg. 2023;39(7):474–480. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20230606-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkitkat RS, Rifay Y, Gharieb HM, et al. Accuracy of the indices of MS-39 anterior segment optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of keratoconic corneas. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022;32(4):2116–2124. doi: 10.1177/11206721211063720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MS-39. CSO ophtalmic, device for Anterior Segment Analysis of Eye. Available from cited 2023 Oct]. Available from: https://www.csoitalia.it/en/prodotto/info/63-ms-39
   Google Scholar
• Savini G, Schiano-Lomoriello D, Hoffer KJ. Repeatability of automatic measurements by a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer combined with Placido topography and agreement with 2 scheimpflug cameras. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(4):471–478. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivarsen A, Fledelius W, Hjortdal J. Three-year changes in epithelial and stromal thickness after PRK or LASIK for high myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(5):2061–2066. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel SV, Erie JC, Jw M, et al. Confocal microscopy changes in epithelial and stromal thickness up to 7 years after LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2007;23(4):385–392. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070401-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Stojanovic A, Liu Y, et al. Postoperative changes in corneal epithelial and stromal thickness profiles after photorefractive keratectomy in treatment of myopia. J Refract Surg. 2015;31(7):446–453. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150623-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapira Y, Mimouni M, Levartovsky S, et al. Comparison of three epithelial removal techniques in PRK: mechanical, alcohol-assisted, and transepithelial laser. J Refract Surg. 2015;31(11):760–766. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20151021-05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HK, Lee KS, Kim JK, et al. Epithelial healing and clinical outcomes in excimer laser photorefractive surgery following three epithelial removal techniques: mechanical, alcohol, and excimer laser. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139(1):56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sia RK, Ryan DS, Stutzman RD, et al. Alcohol versus brush PRK: visual outcomes and adverse effects. Lasers Surg Med. 2012;44(6):475–481. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adib-Moghaddam S, Soleyman-Jahi S, Sanjari Moghaddam A, et al. Efficacy and safety of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(10):1267–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharieb HM, Allah MA, Ahmed AA, et al. Transepithelial laser versus alcohol assisted photorefractive keratectomy safety and efficacy: 1-year follow-up of a contralateral eye study. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2021;35(2):142. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2020.0105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clinch TE, Moshirfar M, Weis JR, et al. Comparison of mechanical and transepithelial debridement during photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmol. 1999;106(3):483–489. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90135-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong R, Ying GS. Characteristics of design and analysis of ophthalmic randomized controlled trials: A review of ophthalmic papers 2020-2021. Ophthalmology Sci. [2022 Dec 31];3(2):100266. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Vida RS. Applications of epithelial thickness mapping in corneal refractive surgery. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2022;36(1):25. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_227_21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaeckle HC. Early clinical outcomes and comparison between trans-PRK and PRK, regarding refractive outcome, wound healing, pain intensity and visual recovery time in a real-world setup. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021;21(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01941-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelwahab SM, Salem MH, Elfayoumi MA. Single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in low to moderate myopia: a one-year follow-up study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:3305–3313. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S326048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire MG. Assessing intereye symmetry and its implications for study design. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(6):27. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.6.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedaghat MR, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Gazanchian M, et al. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(10):632–642. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190826-03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng TH, Chang YM, Lin FH, et al. Investigation of corneal epithelial thickness and irregularity by optical coherence tomography after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. Clin Exp Optom. 2024;107(1):23–31. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2023.2197107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier CA, Holden BA, Epstein D, et al. Factors affecting epithelial hyperplasia after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23(7):1042–1050. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80078-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Shahed AF, El-Shahed RF, Gaballah KA. Epithelial thickness mapping: mechanical photorefractive keratectomy versus transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. Delta J Ophthalmol. 2022;23(4):226–233. doi: 10.4103/djo.djo_48_22
   Google Scholar