Tissue and sperm handling before assisted reproductive technology (ART): A systematic review

References

• Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, et al. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, et al. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tournaye H, Devroey P, Liu J, et al. Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a new effective approach to infertility as a result of congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:1045–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, et al. Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1457–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talreja D, Gupta C, Pai H, et al. Comparative Analysis of Surgically Retrieved Sperms in Cases of Obstructive and Nonobstructive Azoospermia Treated for Infertility. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020;13:201–208.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlander S, Hotaling J, Kirshenbaum E, et al. Impact of fresh versus cryopreserved testicular sperm upon intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancy outcomes in men with azoospermia due to spermatogenic dysfunction: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:344–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves SC, Roque M, Bradley CK, et al. Reproductive outcomes of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection among men with high levels of DNA fragmentation in semen: systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:456–467.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambar RF, Agarwal A, Majzoub A, et al. The Use of Testicular Sperm for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Patients with High Sperm DNA Damage: a Systematic Review. World J Mens Health. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.200084.
   Google Scholar
• Lepine S, McDowell S, Searle LM, et al. Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7:CD010461.
   Google Scholar
• Tournaye H. Update on surgical sperm recovery--the European view. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2010;13:242–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkavukcu S, Ibis E, Kizil S, et al. A laboratory modification to testicular sperm preparation technique improves spermatogenic cell yield. Asian J Androl. 2014;16:852–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller CH, Pagel ER. Recovery, isolation, identification, and preparation of spermatozoa from human testis. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;927:227–240.
   Google Scholar
• Crabbé E, Verheyen G, Silber S, et al. Enzymatic digestion of testicular tissue may rescue the intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle in some patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2791–2796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modarresi T, Sabbaghian M, Shahverdi A, et al. Enzymatic digestion improves testicular sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermic patients. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11:447–452.
   Google Scholar
• Baukloh V. Retrospective multicentre study on mechanical and enzymatic preparation of fresh and cryopreserved testicular biopsies. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1788–1794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy ZP, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, et al. An improved treatment procedure for testicular biopsy specimens offers more efficient sperm recovery: case series. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:376–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wöber M, Ebner T, Steiner SL, et al. A new method to process testicular sperm: combining enzymatic digestion, accumulation of spermatozoa, and stimulation of motility. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:689–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner T, Tews G, Mayer RB, et al. Pharmacological stimulation of sperm motility in frozen and thawed testicular sperm using the dimethylxanthine theophylline. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:1331–1336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tournaye H, Wieme P, Janssens R, et al. Incubation of spermatozoa from asthenozoospermic semen samples with pentoxifylline and 2-deoxyadenosine: variability in hyperactivation and acrosome reaction rates. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:2038–2043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves SC, Spaine DM, Cedenho AP. Effects of pentoxifylline treatment before freezing on motility, viability and acrosome status of poor quality human spermatozoa cryopreserved by the liquid nitrogen vapor method. Brazilian J Med Biol Res = Rev Bras Pesqui Medicas E Biol. 2007;40:985–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountain S, Rizk B, Avery S, et al. An evaluation of the effect of pentoxifylline on sperm function and treatment outcome of male-factor infertility: a preliminary study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12:704–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laokirkkiat P, Kunathikom S, Choavaratana R, et al. Comparison between sperm treated with pentoxifylline and 2-deoxyadenosine using hypo-osmotic swelling test. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90:211–215.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacic B, Vlaisavljevic V, Reljic M. Clinical use of pentoxifylline for activation of immotile testicular sperm before ICSI in patients with azoospermia. J Androl. 2006;27:45–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griveau J-F, Lobel B, Laurent M-C, et al. Interest of pentoxifylline in ICSI with frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa from patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:14–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terriou P, Hans E, Giorgetti C, et al. Pentoxifylline initiates motility in spontaneously immotile epididymal and testicular spermatozoa and allows normal fertilization, pregnancy, and birth after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17:194–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tournaye H, Van Der Linden M, Van Den Abbeel E, et al. Effect of pentoxifylline on implantation and post-implantation development of mouse embryos in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1948–1954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tournaye H, Van Der Linden M, Van Den Abbeel E, et al. Effects of pentoxifylline on in-vitro development of preimplantation mouse embryos. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1475–1480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yovich JM, Edirisinghe WR, Yovich JL. Use of the acrosome reaction to ionophore challenge test in managing patients in an assisted reproduction program: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:902–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner T, Köster M, Shebl O, et al. Application of a ready-to-use calcium ionophore increases rates of fertilization and pregnancy in severe male factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1432–1437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parinaud J, Vieitez G, Moutaffian H, et al. Relevance of acrosome function in the evaluation of semen in vitro fertilizing ability. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:598–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu DY, Baker HW. Relationship between the zona pellucida (ZP) and ionophore A23187-induced acrosome reaction and the ability of sperm to penetrate the ZP in men with normal sperm-ZP binding**Supported by grant no. 930628 from National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(2):312–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallak J, Cocuzza M, Sarkis AS, et al. Organ-sparing microsurgical resection of incidental testicular tumors plus microdissection for sperm extraction and cryopreservation in azoospermic patients: surgical aspects and technical refinements. Urology. 2009;73:882–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casemiro Monteiro RA, Pariz JR, De Campos Pieri P, et al. An easy, reproducible and cost-effective method for andrologists to improve the laboratory diagnosis of nonobstructive azoospermia: a novel microcentrifugation technique. Int Braz J Urol. 2016;42:132–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendin BN, Patel B, Levin HS, et al. Identification of spermatozoa and round spermatids in the ejaculates of men with spermatogenic failure. Urology. 1998;51:816–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeyendran RS, Van Der Ven HH, Perez-Pelaez M, et al. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fertil. 1984;70:219–228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rossato M, Galeazzi C, Ferigo M, et al. Antisperm antibodies modify plasma membrane functional integrity and inhibit osmosensitive calcium influx in human sperm. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1816–1820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares JB, Glina S, Antunes NJ, et al. Sperm tail flexibility test: a simple test for selecting viable spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection from semen samples without motile spermatozoa. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2003;58:250–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliveira NM, Vaca Sánchez R, Rodriguez Fiesta S, et al. Pregnancy with frozen-thawed and fresh testicular biopsy after motile and immotile sperm microinjection, using the mechanical touch technique to assess viability. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:262–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charehjooy N, Najafi MH, Tavalaee M, et al. Selection of Sperm Based on Hypo-Osmotic Swelling May Improve ICSI Outcome: a Preliminary Prospective Clinical Trial. Int J Fertil Steril. 2014;8:21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sallam HN, Farrag A, Agameya A-F, et al. The use of the modified hypo-osmotic swelling test for the selection of immotile testicular spermatozoa in patients treated with ICSI: a randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3435–3440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser R, Yavetz H, Paz GF, et al. The predictive fertilization value of the hypoosmotic swelling test (HOST) for fresh and cryopreserved sperm. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1992;9:265–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Check JH, Katsoff B, Yuan W, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection completely negates the implantation problem associated with conventional fertilization with sperm with low hypo-osmotic swelling test scores as evidenced by evaluating donor-recipient pairs. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:21–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Nour AM, Al Mayman HA, Jaroudi KA, et al. Effects of the hypo-osmotic swelling test on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection for patients with only nonmotile spermatozoa available for injection: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:480–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangoli V, Mangoli R, Dandekar S, et al. Selection of viable spermatozoa from testicular biopsies: a comparative study between pentoxifylline and hypoosmotic swelling test. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:631–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktan TM, Montag M, Duman S, et al. Use of a laser to detect viable but immotile spermatozoa. Andrologia. 2004;36:366–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhoff V, Schüring AN, Krallmann C, et al. Optimizing TESE-ICSI by laser-assisted selection of immotile spermatozoa and polarization microscopy for selection of oocytes. Andrology. 2013;1:67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva NS, Ruhlmann C, Iaizzo RS, et al. Comparative analysis between slow freezing and ultra-rapid freezing for human sperm cryopreservation. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2018;22:331–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter-Safrai N, Karavani G, Levitas E, et al. Does cryopreservation of sperm affect fertilization in nonobstructive azoospermia or cryptozoospermia? Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1148–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isachenko V, Isachenko E, Katkov II, et al. Cryoprotectant-free cryopreservation of human spermatozoa by vitrification and freezing in vapor: effect on motility, DNA integrity, and fertilization ability. Biol Reprod. 2004;71:1167–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le MT, Nguyen TTT, Nguyen TT, et al. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa by vitrification versus conventional rapid freezing: effects on motility, viability, morphology and cellular defects. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;234:14–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman JK. Synopsis of the use of frozen human semen since 1964: state of the art of human semen banking. Fertil Steril. 1973;24:397–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma Y, Sperm Cryopreservation: SM. Principles and Biology. J Infertil Reprod Biol. 2020;8:43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Agarwal A. Sperm retrieval techniques for assisted reproduction. Int Braz J Urol. 2011;37:570–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes LS, Cury VN, Cha JD, et al. Do assisted reproduction outcomes differ according to aetiology of obstructive azoospermia? Andrologia. 2020;52:e13425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corona G, Minhas S, Giwercman A, et al. Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:733–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:131–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannigan RK, Schlegel PN. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: preoperative patient optimization, surgical technique, and tissue processing. Fertil Steril. 2019;111:420–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popal W, Nagy ZP. Laboratory processing and intracytoplasmic sperm injection using epididymal and testicular spermatozoa: what can be done to improve outcomes? Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68 Suppl 1:125–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur KK, Allahbadia G, Singh M. Management of azoospermia with special emphasis on microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in non obstructive azoospermia prior to IVF/ICSI to optimize sperm retrieval rates, pregnancy, live birth rates – a systematic review. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2016;62 (6): 359-371. doi:https://doi.org/10.15406/mojs.2020.08.00162
   Google Scholar
• Verheyen G, Popovic-Todorovic B, Tournaye H. Processing and selection of surgically-retrieved sperm for ICSI: a review. Basic Clin Androl. 2017;27:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Examination and processing of human semen. World Heal Organ. 2010;286. Edition, F.
   Google Scholar
• Simopoulou M, Gkoles L, Bakas P, et al. Improving ICSI: a review from the spermatozoon perspective. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2016;62:359–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhoff V. How to select immotile but viable spermatozoa on the day of intracytoplasmic sperm injection? An embryologist’s view. Andrology. 2015;3:156–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Li F. Cryopreservation of single-sperm: where are we today? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020;18:41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armenian SH, Landier W, Hudson MM, et al. Children’s Oncology Group’s 2013 blueprint for research: survivorship and outcomes. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60:1063–1068.
   Google Scholar
• Corkum KS, Lautz TB, Johnson EK, et al. Testicular wedge biopsy for fertility preservation in children at significant risk for azoospermia after gonadotoxic therapy. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54:1901–1905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lautz TB, Harris CJ, Laronda MM, et al. A fertility preservation toolkit for pediatric surgeons caring for children with cancer. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2019;28:150861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkovitz A, Miller N, Silberman M, et al. A novel solution for freezing small numbers of spermatozoa using a sperm vitrification device. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1975–1983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar