Supine versus prone pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Lao M, Kogan BA, White MD, et al. High recurrence rate at 5-year followup in children after upper urinary tract stone surgery. J Urol. 2014;191(2):440–444. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdivia Uría JG, Valle Gerhold J, López López JA, et al. Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position. J Urol. 1998;160(6 Part 1):1975–1978. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62217-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guven S, Frattini A, Onal B, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children in different age groups: data from the clinical research office of the endourological society (CROES) percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. BJU Int. 2013;111(1):148–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11239.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan HS, Kilicarslan H, Kordan Y, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: does age matter? World J Urol. 2011;29(6):725–729. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0692-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Rosette Jjmch, Tsakiris P, Ferrandino MN, et al. Beyond prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comprehensive review. Eur Urol. 2008;54(6):1262–1269. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir H, Erbin A, Sahan M, et al. Comparison of supine and prone miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of lower pole, middle pole and renal pelvic stones: a matched pair analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2019;45(5):956–964. doi: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele D, Marshall V. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: a neglected approach? J Endourol. 2007;21(12):1433–1438. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339(jul21 1):b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luchini C, Stubbs B, Solmi M, et al. Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. WJG. 2017;5(4):80. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.80
   Google Scholar
• Desoky EAE, Sakr AM, ElSayed ER, et al. Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in flank-free modified supine position vs prone position in treatment of pediatric renal pelvic and lower caliceal stones. J Endourol. 2022;36(5):610–614. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abouhashem S, Almednini M, Abdelfattah E, et al. Prone versus flank-free modified supine position mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric age group. Zagazig Univ Med J. 2023;29:293–299.
   Google Scholar
• Tawfeek AM, Arafa H, Higazy A, et al. Is supine a preferred position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric age group? A randomized controlled study. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024;76(1):81–87. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05496-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campobasso D, Bocchialini T, Bevilacqua L, et al. Comparison between prone and supine nephrolithotomy in pediatric population: a double center experience. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022;54(12):3063–3068. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03341-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezer A, Turedi B, Guzel R, et al. Comparison of two centers’ experience in pediatric supine and prone miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy with propensity match analysis. J Endourol. 2024;38:121–128. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitkin A, Özlü DN, Ekşi M, et al. A comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed in the supine and prone positions for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones: a single-center experience. Urolithiasis. 2023;51(1):122. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01497-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelosi P, Croci M, Calappi E, et al. The prone positioning during general anesthesia minimally affects respiratory mechanics while improving functional residual capacity and increasing oxygen tension. Anesth Analg. 1995;80(5):955–960. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199505000-00017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miano R, Scoffone C, De Nunzio C, et al. Position: prone or supine is the issue of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2010;24(6):931–938. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaolides T, Moraitis K, Bach C, et al. Positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: thirty-five years of evolution. Arab J Urol. 2012;10(3):307–316. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.06.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuan D, Liu Y, Rao H, et al. Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2016;30(7):754–763. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Zheng S, Xu Y, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients in the supine versus prone position. J Endourol. 2010;24(12):1941–1946. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Gao L, Li Q, et al. Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2019;66:62–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol. 2008;53(1):184–190. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerli R, Mungarwadi A, Ghagane S, et al. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children. J Sci Soc. 2018;45(2):63. doi: 10.4103/jss.JSS_24_18
   Google Scholar
• Hopper KD, Sherman JL, Luethke JM, et al. The retrorenal colon in the supine and prone patient. Radiol. 1987;162(2):443–446. doi: 10.1148/radiology.162.2.3797658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmi A, Jones P, Somani BK. Current status and role of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in endourology. Urology. 2021;148:26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones P, Pietropaolo A, Chew BH, et al. Atlas of scoring systems, grading tools, and nomograms in endourology: a comprehensive overview from the TOWER endourological society research group. J Endourol. 2021;35(12):1863–1882. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraghty RM, Thakur A, Howles S, et al. Use of temporally validated machine learning models to predict outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using data from the British association of urological surgeons percutaneous nephrolithotomy audit. Eur Urol Focus. 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.01.011
   Google Scholar