Testicular sperm extraction for men with cryptozoospermia – are we jumping the gun?

References

• World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 6th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kang Y-N, Hsiao Y-W, Chen C-Y, et al. Testicular sperm is superior to ejaculated sperm for ICSI in cryptozoospermia: an update systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7874. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26280-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karabulut S, Keskin I, Kutlu P, et al. Male infertility, azoozpermia and cryptozoospermia incidence among three infertility clinics in Turkey. Türk Ürol DergisiTurkish J Urol. 2018;44(2):109–113. doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.59196
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma R. Basic semen analysis. In: Agarwal A, Gupta S Sharma R, editors. Andrological eval. Male Infertil. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma R. Cytospin Procedure and Nuclear fAst rEd and Picroindigocarmine Staining Procedure for Azoospermic Sample. In: Agarwal A, Gupta S Sharma R, editors. Andrological Eval. Male Infertil. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 85–91.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma RK, Gupta S, Agarwal A, et al. Role of cytocentrifugation combined with nuclear fast picroindigocarmine staining in detecting cryptozoospermia in men diagnosed with Azoospermia. World J Mens Health. 2022;40(4):627–635. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.210210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu H, Luo Z, Chen J, et al. Treatment progress of cryptozoospermia with Western Medicine and traditional Chinese medicine: a literature review. Health Sci Rep. 2023;6(1):e1019. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shoshany O, Abhyankar N, Mufarreh N, et al. Outcomes of anastrozole in oligozoospermic hypoandrogenic subfertile men. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(3):589–594. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinaro JA, Brant A, Kang C, et al. Successful cryptozoospermia management with multiple semen specimen collection. Fertil Steril. 2023;120(5):996–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.07.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito C, Mizuta S, Higashiyama R, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes with ejaculated and testicular sperm in patients with cryptozoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(4):e65. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.07.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alrabeeah K, Wachter A, Phillips S, et al. Sperm retrieval outcomes with microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with cryptozoospermia. Andrology. 2015;3(3):462–466. doi: 10.1111/andr.12000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel SR, Park B, Reddy A, et al. Testicular Core Extraction: Important Technique for Determining Sperm Retrieval Method in Non-obstructive Azoospermia. Urology. 2023;173:87–91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, et al. Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(6):1457–1460. doi: 10.1093/HUMREP/10.6.1457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):131–135. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.1.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corona G, Minhas S, Giwercman A, et al. Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(6):733–757. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlegel PN, Palermo GD, Goldstein M, et al. Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for nonobstructive azoospermia. Urology. 1997;49(3):435–440. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00032-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkandari MH, Moryousef J, Phillips S, et al. Testicular Sperm Aspiration (TESA) or Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction (micro–TESE): Which Approach is Better in Men with Cryptozoospermia and Severe Oligozoospermia? Urology. 2021;154:164–169. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alrabeeah K, Hakami B, Abumelha S, et al. Testicular microdissection following failed sperm aspiration: a single-center experience. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26(19):7176–7181. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202210_29905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves SC. Microdissection TESE versus conventional TESE for men with nonobstructive azoospermia undergoing sperm retrieval. Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48(3):569–578. doi: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2022.99.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westlander G. Utility of micro-TESE in the most severe cases of non-obstructive azoospermia. Ups J Med Sci. 2020;125(2):99–103. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1737600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohan P, Daly N, O’Kelly A, et al. Evaluation of Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction (mTESE), Outcomes and Predictive Factors in Ireland: The Gold Standard for Men with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia. J Reprod Infertil. 2021;22:103–109. doi: 10.18502/jri.v22i2.5795
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ben-Ami I, Raziel A, Strassburger D, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome of ejaculated versus extracted testicular spermatozoa in cryptozoospermic men. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(7):1867–1871. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui X, Ding P, Gao G, et al. Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Between Spermatozoa Retrieved from Testicular Biopsy and from Ejaculate in Cryptozoospermia Patients. Urology. 2017;102:106–110. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.071
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hernandez-Nieto C, Lee JA, Luna-Rojas M, et al. Surgical sperm extraction vs. semen centrifugation: method of spermatozoa recovery does not correlate with euploidy rates in patients with cryptozoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(3):e91–2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Nieto C, Lee JA, Alkon T, et al. Sedimentation versus surgery: testicular and ejaculated sperm result in similar IVF outcomes in patients with cryptozoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(3):e203–4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alharbi M, Almarzouq A, Zini A. Sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes with testicular sperm aspiration in men with severe oligozoospermia and cryptozoospermia. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021;15(5):E272–5. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibi H, Tokoro M, Sonohara M, et al. Cryptozoospermia: Should we use ejaculated sperm or surgically retrieved sperm for assisted reproductive technology? Reprod Med Biol. 2023;22(1):e12546. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiyal RS, Cannarella R, Kuroda S, et al. Clinical outcomes of cryptozoospermic patients undergoing surgical sperm retrieval. Front Urol. 2023;3:1160122. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2023.1160122
   Google Scholar
• Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Abhyankar N, Kathrins M, Niederberger C. Use of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection among men with cryptozoospermia: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(6):1469–1475.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves SC, Roque M, Bradley CK, et al. Reproductive outcomes of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection among men with high levels of DNA fragmentation in semen: systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):456–467.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerris J. Methods of semen collection not based on masturbation or surgical sperm retrieval. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5(3):211–215. doi: 10.1093/humupd/5.3.211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameed N, Ozturk O. Testicular versus epididymal spermatozoa in intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment cycles. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad JAMC. 2010;22:159–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esteves SC, Zini A, Coward RM, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations. Andrologia. 2021;53(2):e13874. doi: 10.1111/and.13874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinaro JA, Schlegel PN. Sperm DNA Damage and its relevance in fertility treatment: a review of recent literature and Current practice guidelines. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(2):1446. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateizel I, Racca A, Aligianni E, et al. P-063 microfluidic technology is highly effective in selecting a sperm population with high progressive motility and low DNA fragmentation index. Hum Reprod. 2023;38(Supplement_1):dead093.428. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead093.428
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PardiñPardiñAs ML, Martin A, Ortega-Jaén D, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation and microfluidics: A new era in human sperm selection. Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica. 2022;9(3):100121. doi: 10.1016/j.medre.2022.100121
   Google Scholar
• Ambar RF, Agarwal A, Majzoub A, et al. The use of testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with high sperm DNA damage: a systematic review. World J Mens Health. 2021;39(3):391–398. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200084
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stalf T, Mehnert C, Hajimohammad A, et al. Influence of motility and vitality in intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated and testicular sperm. Andrologia. 2005;37(4):125–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2005.00665.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele EK, McClure N, Lewis S. A comparison of the morphology of testicular, epididymal, and ejaculated sperm from fertile men and men with obstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1099–1103. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00523-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majzoub A, Agarwal A, Esteves SC. Sperm DNA fragmentation: laboratory and clinical aspects. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(S4):S675–7. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.05.20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strassburger D, Friedler S, Raziel A, et al. Very low sperm Count affects the result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17(8):431–436. doi: 10.1023/A:1009413201849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wren J, Hudnall M, Pham M, et al. A prior history of cryptozoospermia is associated with a significantly higher chance of a successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction compared to non-obstructive azoospermia. J Clin Med. 2023;12(23):7255. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar