Exploring non-invasive approaches to assist in the detection of clandestine human burials: developing a way forward

References

• Ranalletti M. When death is not the end: towards a typology of the treatment of corpses of ‘disappeared detainees’ in Argentina from 1975 to 1983. In: Anstatt E, Dreyfus JM, editors. Destruction and human remains. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2016. p. 146–179.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan B, Wiltshire P. Experimental validation of forensic evidence: a study of the decomposition of buried pigs in a heavy clay soil. Forensic Sci Int. 1999;101:113–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steadman DW, Basler W, Hochrein MJ, et al. Investigative and legal aspects of a U.S. Federal death penalty case. In: Blau S, Ubelaker DH, editors. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2016. p. 447–462.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter J, Cox M. Forensic archaeology: advances in theory and practice. London: Routledge; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter J, Simpson B, Sturdy Colls C. Forensic approaches to buried remains. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter JR. Domestic homicide investigations in the United Kingdom. In: Blau S, Ubelaker DH, editors. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2016. p. 463–476.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund WD, Connor M, Scott DD. The archaeology of contemporary mass graves. Hist Archaeol. 2001;35:57–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerez-Farran C, Amago S, editors. Unearthing Franco’s Legacy: mass graves and the recovery of historical memory in Spain. Notre Dame (IN): University of Notre Dame Notre Dame; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt S. Mass graves and the collection of forensic evidence: genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Advances in forensic taphonomy; method, theory and archaeological perspectives. Boca Roton (FL): CRC Press; 2002. p. 277–292.
   Google Scholar
• Tyner J. Dead labor, landscapes, and mass graves: administrative violence during the Cambodian genocide. Geoforum. 2014;52:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright R, Hanson I, Sterenberg J. The archaeology of mass graves. In: Hunter J, Cox M, editors. Forensic archaeology: advances in theory and practice. London: Routledge; 2005. p. 137–158.
   Google Scholar
• Wright R. Where are the bodies? In the ground. Public Hist. 2010;32:96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrándiz F, Robben A, editors. Necropolitics: mass graves and exhumations in the age of human rights. Pennsylvania (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kho LS, Azizi S, Mahmood MS. Beyond DVI: future identification, research and archiving. Forensic Sci Criminol. 2016;1:4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan OW, Sribanditmongkol P, Perera C, et al. Mass fatality management following the South Asian tsunami disaster: case studies in Thailand, Indonesia, and Sri Lanka. PLoS Med. 2006;3:809–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera C, Briggs C. Guidelines for the effective conduct of mass burials following mass disasters: post-Asian tsunami disaster experience in retrospect. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2008;4:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loe L, Barker C, Brady K, et al. Remember me to all: the archaeological recovery and identification of soldiers who fought and died in the battle of fromelles, 1916. Oxford: Oxford Archaeology; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein RL, Roth JK. Approaches to Auschwitz: the holocaust and its legacy. Westminster: John Knox Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund WD. Recent mass graves, an introduction. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Advances in forensic taphonomy: method, theory and archaeological perspective. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2002. p. 244–261.
   Google Scholar
• Jessee E, Skinner M. A typology of mass grave and mass grave-related sites. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;152:55–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jugo A, Wastell S. Disassembling the pieces, reassembling the social: the forensic and political lives of secondary mass graves in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In: Anstett E, Dreyfus JM, editors. Human remains and identification: mass violence, genocide, and the ‘forensic turn’. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2015. p. 142–174.
   Google Scholar
• Klinker M, Kather AL. Blog of the European journal of international law. 2016. [cited 2018 Mar 18]. Available from: https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-legal-protection-of-mass-graves/
   Google Scholar
• Cordner S, Coninx E, Kim HJ, et al. editors. Management of dead bodies after disasters: a field manual for first responders. Geneva: PAHO/WHO/ICRC; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger JH. Mass grave or communal burial? A discussion of terminology. 2013. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259591624_Mass_grave_or_communal_burial_A_discussion_of_terminology
   Google Scholar
• Jessee E. Exhuming conflict: some recommendations for the creation of a series of experimental mass grave and mass grave related sites. [master's thesis]. Burnaby (BC): Simon Fraser University; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Salado Puerto M, Tuller H. Large-scale forensic investigations into the missing: challenges and considerations. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;279:219–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhl R. The contribution by (forensic) archaeologists to human rights investigations of mass graves. Stavanger: Museum of Archaeology; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Fondebrider L. The application of forensic anthropology to the investigation of cases of political violence. In: Dirkmaat D, editor. A companion to forensic anthropology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 639–648.
   Google Scholar
• Klinker M. Karadžić’s guilty verdict and forensic evidence from Bosnia’s mass graves. Sci Justice. 2016;56:498–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renshaw L. Exhuming loss: memory, materiality and mass graves of the Spanish civil war. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Norton E, Ford A, Cheetham P, editors. Multi-temporal remote sensing of mass graves in temperate environments. Orlando (FL): AAFS; 2015. p. 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Larson DO, Vass AA, Wise M. Advanced scientific methods and procedures in the forensic investigation of clandestine graves. J Contemp Crim Just. 2011;27:149–182.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Mass graves at sahanici Christian science monitor. 1998. [cited 2018 Jul 27]. Available from http://www.csmonitor.com/1995/1116/16071.html/(page)/2
   Google Scholar
• Tyers CA. Hidden atrocities: the forensic investigation and prosecution of genocide [dissertation]. Knoxville (TN): University of Tennessee; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker WE. Grave dowsing reconsidered. Iowa City (IA): Office of the State Archaeologist, University of Iowa; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• van Leusen M. Dowsing and archaeology. Archaeol Prospect. 1998;5:123–138.
   Google Scholar
• Komar DA. The use of cadaver dogs in locating scattered, scavenged human remains: preliminary field test results. J Forensic Sci. 1999;44:405–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebmann AJ, David E, Sorg MH. Cadaver dog handbook: forensic training and tactics for the recovery of human remains. Boca Roton (FL): CRC Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Buck SC. Searching for graves using geophysical technology: field tests with ground penetrating radar, magnetometry, and electrical resistivity. J Forensic Sci. 2003;48:5–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter J, Karasak M, Reddick A, et al. Location of mass graves using non-invasive remote sensing equipment, geophysics, and satellite imagery. Internal report. Sarajevo: International Commission for Missing Persons (ICMP); 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cheetham P. Forensic geophysical survey. In: Hunter J, Cox M, editors. Forensic archaeology: advances in theory and practice. Abingdon: Routledge; 2005. p. 62–95.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport GC. Remote sensing applications in forensic investigations. Hist Archaeol. 2001;35:87–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschfield A, Bowers K, editors. Mapping and analysing crime data lessons from research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Somma R, Cascio M, Silvestro M, Torre E. A GIS‐based quantitative approach for the search of clandestine graves, Italy. J Forensic Sci. 2018;63:882–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddick A. The use of spatial techniques in the location and excavation of contemporary mass graves. Birmingham: University of Birmingham; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Orengo HA. Detection of body dump sites and clandestine burials: a GIS-based landscape approach. In: Clark JT, Hagemeister EM, editors. Digital discovery, exploring new frontiers in human heritage. Budapest, Hungary: Archaeolingua; 2007. p. 185–190.
   Google Scholar
• Congram D, Kenyhercz M, Green AG. Grave mapping in support of the search for missing persons in conflict contexts. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;278:260–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau S, Ubelaker DH, editors. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• France DL, Griffin TJ, Swanburg JG, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to the detection of clandestine graves. J Forensic Sci. 1992;37:1445–1458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffell A. Searching for the IRA ‘disappeared’: ground-penetrating radar investigation of a churchyard burial site, Northern Ireland. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50:414–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Álvarez JP, Rubio-Melendi D, Martínez-Velasco A, et al. Discovery of a mass grave from the Spanish Civil War using Ground Penetrating Radar and forensic archaeology. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;267:e10–e17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffell A, McCabe A, Donnelly C, Sloan B. Location and assessment of an historic (150–160 years old) mass grave using geographic and ground penetrating radar investigation, NW Ireland. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54:382–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuldenrein J, Trimble M, Malin-Boyce S, Smith M. Geoarchaeology, forensics, and the prosecution of Saddam Hussein: a case study from the Iraq War (2003–2011). Geoarchaeology. 2016;32:130–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau S. Body farms. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2017;13:484–486.
   Google Scholar
• Konecny G. Geoinformation: remote sensing, photogrammetry and geographical information systems. London: Taylor & Francis; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Satellite imagery analysis for urban conflict documentation: Aleppo, Syria. Washington (DC): American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Giardino MJ. A history of NASA remote sensing contributions to archaeology. J Archaeol Sci. 2011;38:2003–2009.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Pedagogy in action: what is Google earth? 2018. [cited 2018 May 09]. Available from: https://serc.carleton.edu/sp/library/google_earth/what.html
   Google Scholar
• Kelly AB, Kelly NM. Validating the remotely sensed geography of crime: a review of emerging issues. Remote Sensing. 2014;6:12723–12751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amendt J, Rodner S, Schuch CP, et al. Helicopter thermal imaging for detecting insect infested cadavers. Sci Justice. 2017;57:366–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne S. Man missing for a decade found inside car visible on Google Maps. Independent. 2015. Available from: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/davie-lee-niles-man-missing-for-a-decade-found-inside-car-visible-on-google-maps-a6733306.html
   Google Scholar
• Snirer E. Hyperspectral remote sensing of individual gravesites – exploring the effects of cadaver decomposition on vegetation and soil spectra. Montreal (QC): McGill University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes L. Hidden graves spotted by airborne imaging. New Sci. 2010;206:18–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle JK, Jervis JR, Hansen JD, et al. Geophysical monitoring of simulated clandestine graves using electrical and ground-penetrating radar methods: 0–3 years after burial. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57:1467–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voerhoeven GJJ. Providing an archaeological bird’s eye view-an overall picture of ground-based means to execute low-altitude aerial photography (LAAP) in archaeology. Archaeol Prospect. 2009;16:233–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter J, Roberts C, Martin A. Studies in crime: an introduction to forensic archaeology. London: Routledge; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Conyers L, Goodman D. Ground penetrating radar an introduction for archaeologists. Walnut Creek (CA): AltaMira Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman JR, El-Baz F, editors. Remote sensing in archaeology: interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology. New York (NY): Springer; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lasaponara R, Masini N, editors. Satellite remote sensing: a new tool for archaeology. New York (NY): Springer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gaffney C, Gater J. Revealing the buried past: geophysics for archaeologists. London: Tempus Publishing; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Chase ASZ, Chase DZ, Chase AF. LiDAR for archaeological research and the study of historical landscapes. In: Masini N, Soldovieri F, editors. Sensing the past, geotechnologies and the environment. Tempe (AZ): School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University; 2017. p. 89–100.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner MF, York HP, Connor MA. Postburial disturbance of graves in Bosnia-Herzegovina. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Advances in Forensic Taphonomy: method, theory and archaeological perspectives. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2002. p. 293–307.
   Google Scholar
• Sterenberg J. Dealing with the remains of conflict: an international response to crimes against humanity, forensic recovery, identification and repatriation in the former Yugoslavia. In: Blau S, Ubelaker D, editors. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. 1st ed. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press; 2009. p. 416–425.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Following the trail of statements and aerial photos. Sense tribunal. 2006. [cited 2018 Jul 27]. Available from: http://www.sense-agency.com/icty/following-the-trail-of-statements-and-aerial-photos.29.html?cat_id =1&news_id =9817
   Google Scholar
• Trimble MK, Malin‐Boyce S. CRM and the military: cultural resource management. In: King TF, editor. A companion to cultural resource management. Chichester: Blackwell; 2011. p. 515–533.
   Google Scholar
• Hammack J, Burch R, Gerrick B, Park D. Spectral and geological assessment of coalition provisional authority mass grave site 0020. [Restricted Report]. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter JR, Sturdy Colls C. Archaeology. In: Siegel JA, Saukko PJ, editors. Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Elsevier; 2013. p. 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hammack J. Applied analysis Inc. Spectral detection of mass grave sites of suspected mass grave sites compiled by the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) mass grave team [Restricted Report]. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Wheatley D, Gillings M. Spatial technology and archaeology: the archaeological applications of GIS. London: Taylor & Francis; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Sito-Sucic D. New methods betray Bosnian mass graves [Internet]. 2005. [cited 2018 Apr 24]. Available from: http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/enviro/EnviroRepublish_1439449.htm
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands A, Sarris A. Detection of exposed and subsurface archaeological remains using multi- sensor remote sensing. J Archaeol Sci. 2006;34:795–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masini N, Lasaponara R. Investigating the spectral capability of Quickbird data to detect archaeological remains buried under vegetated and not vegetated areas. J Cult Herit. 2007;8:53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambua C. DRC aid workers in record appeal for Kasai conflict victims. Al Jazeera. 2018. [cited 2018 Jan 23]. Available from: http://www.aljazeera.com/blogs/africa/2018/01/drc-record-aid-appeal-kasai-conflict-victims-180123072653502.html
   Google Scholar
• Ingvoldstad ME. Differential decomposition in mice burials: a preliminary study with potential mass grave applications: New York (NY): New York University; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Troutman L, Moffatt C, Simmons T. A preliminary examination of differential decomposition patterns in mass graves. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59:621–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adair TW. Survival of physical evidence from a scavenged grave: a look at a case study and research from Colorado. J Forensic Ident. 1998;48:459–465.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport CG, Griffin TJ, Lindemann JW, Heimmer D. Geoscientists and law officers work together in Colorado. Geotimes. 1990;35:13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Powell KJ. The detection of buried human skeletal remains in the Australian environment [dissertation]. ‎Adelaide (South Australia): The University of Adelaide; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz JJ, Collins ME, Falsetti AB. Sequential monitoring of burials containing large pig cadavers using ground-penetrating radar. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51:607–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz JJ. Sequential monitoring of burials containing small pig cadavers using ground penetrating radar. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53:279–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle JK, Jervis JR, Roberts D, et al. Long-term geophysical monitoring of simulated clandestine graves using electrical and ground penetrating radar methods: 4–6 years after burial. J Forensic Sci. 2016;61:309–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle JK, Giubertoni M, Cassidy NJ, et al. The use of magnetic susceptibility as a forensic search tool. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;246:31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblanc G, Kalacska M, Soffer R. Detection of single graves by airborne hyperspectral imaging. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;245:17–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalacska M, Bell LS. Remote sensing as a tool for the detection of clandestine mass graves. Can Soc Forensic Sci J. 2006;39:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog C. A Study of the effects of cadaveric decomposition on hyperspectral signatures of soil and vegetation. Montreal (QC): McGill University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Nuzzo L, Cassidy NJ, Jervis J, Pringle JK, editors. Forensic geophysics over simulated urban clandstine burials: preliminary results from GPR and resistivity surveys. 26th National Conference of the Gruppo Nazionale di Geofisica della Terra Solida (National Group of Geophysics of the Solid Earth); 2007 Nov 13–15; Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Blau S, Sterenberg J. The use of forensic archaeology and anthropology in the search and recovery of buried evidence. Encyclopaedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier; 2015. p. 236–245.
   Google Scholar
• Scott J, Hunter JR. Environmental influences on resistivity mapping for the location of clandestine graves. In: Pye K, Croft D, editors. Forensic geoscience: principles, techniques and applications bath. London: Geological Society Publishing House; 2004. p. 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan BW. The search for graves. Archaeol Geophys. 1991;56:1310–1319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick HC, Pringle JK, Wisniewski KD, et al. Determining geophysical responses from burials in graveyards and cemeteries. Geophysics. 2017;82:B245–B55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone PM, Swanger KJ, Stanley-Price N, Thursfield A. Finding graves in a cemetery: preliminary forensic GPR investigations in the non-Catholic cemetery in Rome (Italy). Measurement. 2016;80:53–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mant AK. A study of exhumation data. London: London University; 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Mant AK. Knowledge acquired from post-War exhumations. In: Boddington A, Garland AN, Janaway RC, editors. Spectral scientist/manager/geoscientist NGA, SORC, Army space support team US army restricted report. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1987. p. 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Komar D. Differential decay rates in single, multiple, and mass graves in Bosnia. J Forensic Sci. 2001;7:242–243.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Missing persons from the Kosovo conflict and its aftermath: a stocktaking. Sarajevo: ICMP; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Batajnica summary report. Forensic monitoring activities. Sarajevo: International Commission of Missing Persons (ICMP); 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Molina CM, Pringle JK, Saumett M, Evans GT. Geophysical and botanical monitoring of simulated graves in a tropical rainforest, Colombia, South America. J Appl Geophys. 2016;135:232–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina CM, Pringle JK, Saumett M, Evans GT. Geophysical monitoring of simulated graves with resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, conductivity and GPR in Colombia, South America. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;261:106–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehnke M. Body of evidence: UT using donated corpses in mass grave project with international aspirations [Internet]. Knoxville News Sentinel; 2013 [cited 2017 Sep 08]. Available from:http://archive.knoxnews.com/news/local/body-of-evidence-ut-using-donated-corpses-in-mass-grave-project-with-international-aspirations-ep-35-355949691.html/
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran KA, Mundorff AZ, White DA, et al. A novel application of terrestrial LIDAR to characterize elevation change at human grave surfaces in support of narrowing down possible unmarked grave locations. Forensic Science International. 2018;289:320–328.
   Google Scholar
• Morley M, Luong S, Flannery E, et al. After site visit # 2: Geomorphology of After. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lillesand T, Kiefer R, Chipman J. Remote sensing and image interpretation. 5th ed. London: Wiley & Sons Inc; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. What is LiDAR NB. 2017. [cited 2017 Jan 25]. Available from: http://www.lidar-uk.com/what-is-lidar/
   Google Scholar
• Sutton C. The wettest March in recent history is on the cards as Sydney clocks up 16 rainy days and more than a week to go: news.com.au. 2017. [cited 2017 Mar 19]. Available from: http://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/the-wettest-march-in-recent-history-is-on-the-cards-as-sydney-clocks-up-16-rainy-days-and-more-than-a-week-to-go/news-story/988409de59d01a92197439139509d007
   Google Scholar
• Blau S, Forbes S. Taphonomy in the forensic context. In: Payne-James J, Byard RW, editors. Encyclopaedia of forensic and legal medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015. p. 227–235.
   Google Scholar
• Durrett D. What’s the volume of average human? 2017. [cited 2018 Jul 27] Available from: https://www.quora.com/Whats-the-volume-of-average-human
   Google Scholar
• Spruill CD. Using spatial analysis to determine the MNI of mass graves [honor’s thesis]. Boone (NC): Appalachian State University; 2017.
   Google Scholar