Advanced search
Publication Cover
Forensic Sciences Research Volume 7, 2022 - Issue 1
Journal homepage
2,305
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Objective evaluation of similarity scores derived by Evofinder® system for marks on bullets fired from Chinese Norinco QSZ-92 pistols

Feng Donga School of Forensic Science, People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing, China;b Shanghai Key Laboratory of Crime Scene Evidence, Shanghai Research Institute of Criminal Science and Technology, Shanghai, ChinaView further author information
,
Yabin Zhaoa School of Forensic Science, People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing, ChinaView further author information
,
Yaping Luoc Graduate School, People’s Public, Security University of China, Beijing, ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Weifang Zhangb Shanghai Key Laboratory of Crime Scene Evidence, Shanghai Research Institute of Criminal Science and Technology, Shanghai, ChinaView further author information
&
Yuesong Lia School of Forensic Science, People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing, ChinaView further author information
Pages 40-46 | Received 29 Mar 2019, Accepted 09 Jul 2019, Published online: 09 Sep 2019

References

  • Evofinder [Internet]. Tunis (Tunisia): ScannBI Technology. [cited 2019 Mar 7]. Available from: http://www.evofinder.com.
  • Rahm J. Evaluation of an electronic comparison system and implementation of a quantitative effectiveness criterion. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;214:173–177.
  • Li Y, Lin S, Luo Y, et al. Performance evaluation of a registered ballistic database using the Evofinder® System. J Forensic Sci. 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14054
  • Riva F, Champod C. Automatic comparison and evaluation of impressions left by a firearm on fired cartridge cases. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59:637–647.
  • Riva F, Hermsen R, Mattijssen E, et al. Objective evaluation of subclass characteristics on breech face marks. J Forensic Sci. 2017;62:417–422.
  • Fawcett T. ROC graphs: notes and practical considerations for data mining researchers, Intelligent Enterprise Technologies Laboratory. HP Laboratories Palo Alto, 2003.
  • Meuwly D, Ramos D, Haraksim R. A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;276:142–153.
  • Leegwater AJ, Meuwly D, Sjerps M, et al. Performance study of a score-based likelihood ratio system for forensic fingermark comparison. J Forensic Sci. 2017;2:626–640.
  • Hepler AB, Saunders CP, Davis LJ, et al. Score-based likelihood ratios for handwriting evidence. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;219:129–140.
  • Zadora G, Martyna A, Ramos D, et al. Statistical analysis in forensic science: evidential value of multivariate physicochemical data. In: Encyclopedia of analytical science. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. p. 373–378.
  • Evett IW, Jackson G, Lambert JA, et al. The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements. Sci Justice. 2000;40:233.
  • Morrison GS, Enzinger E. Score based procedures for the calculation of forensic likelihood ratios – scores should take account of both similarity and typicality. Sci Justice. 2018;58:47.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.