Effects of storage time on DNA profiling success from archived latent fingerprint samples using an optimised workflow

References

• Innocence Project [Internet]. New York (NY): Innocence Project; c1997-2019. Exonerate the innocent; [cited 2018 Nov 3]; [About 2 screens]. Available from: https://www.innocenceproject.org/exonerate/
   Google Scholar
• Butler JM. Overview and history of DNA typing. In: Butler JM, editor. Forensic DNA typing: biology, technology, and genetics of STR markers. Oxford (UK): Elsevier Academic Press; 2005. p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Raven PH, Johnson GB. Biology. St. Louis (MI): Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing; 1986. Chapter 42, Organisation of the vertebrate body. p. 900–919.
   Google Scholar
• Wickenheiser RA. Trace DNA: a review, discussion of theory, and application of the transfer of trace quantities of DNA through skin contact. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47:442–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kita T, Yamaguchi H, Yokoyama M, et al. Morphological study of fragmented DNA on touched objects. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008;3:32–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinones I, Daniel B. Cell free DNA as a component of forensic evidence recovered from touched surfaces. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012;6:26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trozzi TA, Schwartz RL, Hollars ML, et al. Processes and procedures used to develop latent prints. In: Leighton LD, Schehl SA, Trozzi YE, editors. Processing guide for developing latent prints. Quantico (VA): U.S. Department of Justice; 2000. p. 4–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins LA, May RE. The preservation of friction ridges. In: Holder EH, Laub JH, editors. The fingerprint sourcebook. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 2012. p. 8.1–8.21.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon AD, Hytinen ME, McClain AM, et al. An optimised DNA analysis workflow for the sampling, extraction, and concentration of DNA obtained from archived latent fingerprints. J Forensic Sci. 2018;63:47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oorschot RAH, Ballantyne KN, Mitchell RJ. Forensic trace DNA: a review. Investig Genet. 2010;1:14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulz MM, Reichert W. Archived or directly swabbed latent fingerprints as a DNA source for STR typing. Forensic Sci Int. 2002;127:128–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly DJ, Murphy C, McDermott SD. The transfer of touch DNA from hands to glass, fabric and wood. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012;6:41–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler JM. DNA quantitation. In: Butler JM, editor. Advanced topics in forensic DNA typing: methodology. Oxford (UK): Elsevier Academic Press; 2012; p. 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Greenspoon S, Ban J, Pablo L, et al. Validation and implementation of the PowerPlex 16 BIO System STR multiplex for forensic casework. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49:71–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins PJ, Hennessy LK, Leibelt CS, et al. Developmental validation of a single-tube amplification of the 13 CODIS STR loci, D2S1338, D19S433, and amelogenin: the AmpFℓSTR Identifiler PCR Amplification Kit. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang DY, Gopinath S, Lagacé RE, et al. Developmental validation of the GlobalFiler® Express PCR Amplification Kit: a 6-dye multiplex assay for the direct amplification of reference samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015;19:148–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond JJ, van Oorschot RAH, Gunn PR, et al. Trace DNA success rates relating to volume crime offences. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2009;2:136–137.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe A, Murray C, Whitaker J, et al. The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces. Forensic Sci Int. 2002;129:25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oorschot RAH, Phelan DG, Furlong S, et al. Are you collecting all the available DNA from touched objects? Int Congr Ser. 2003;1239:803–807.
   Google Scholar
• van Oorschot RAH, Treadwell S, Beaurepaire J, et al. Beware of the possibility of fingerprinting techniques transferring DNA. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50:1417–1422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proff C, Schmitt C, Schneider PM, et al. Experiments on the DNA contamination risk via latent fingerprint brushes. Int Congr Ser. 2006;1288:601–603.
   Google Scholar
• Hytinen ME, Solomon AD, Miller MT. Methods for obtaining high-quality touch DNA from a nonporous surface after latent fingerprint collection. J Forensic Identif. 2017;67:71–84.
   Google Scholar
• van Oorschot RAH, Jones MK. DNA fingerprints from fingerprints. Nature. 1997;387:767–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicklas JA, Noreault-Conti T, Buel E. Development of a real-time method to detect DNA degradation in forensic samples. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57:466–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet D, Lorente M, Lorente JA, et al. An improved method to recover saliva from human skin: the double swab technique. J Forensic Sci. 1997;42:320–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QIAGEN. Investigator Quantiplex handbook. Hilden (GE): QIAGEN, 2012. Available from: https://www.qiagen.com/au/resources/resourcedetail?id=755e8515-3990-4557-99b0-e78a42cc152f&lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Life Techonologies. AmpFℓSTR^® Identifiler^® Plus PCR Amplification Kit user guide. Carlsbad (CA): Life Technologies, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Cupples CM, Champagne JR, Lewis KE, et al. STR profiles from DNA samples with “undetected” or low quantifiler results. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54:103–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan K, Johnson P, Rowlands D, et al. New developments and challenges in the use of the UK DNA database: addressing the issue of contaminated consumables. Forensic Sci Int. 2004;146:175–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar