745
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The classification of handwriting features of the Kazakh language written in Latin script

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 774-781 | Received 23 Sep 2020, Accepted 29 Jul 2021, Published online: 13 Apr 2022

References

  • Kim A, Omarova M, Zhaksylyk A, et al. editors. CoWriting Kazakh: transitioning to a new Latin script using social robots. 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE; 2019.
  • Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan. State register of forensic methodologies of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Astana: Ministry of Justice; 2017.
  • Agius A, Jones K, Epple R, et al. The use of handwriting examinations beyond the traditional court purpose. Sci Justice. 2017;57:394–400.
  • Taroni F, Marquis R, Schmittbuhl M, et al. The use of the likelihood ratio for evaluative and investigative purposes in comparative forensic handwriting examination. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;214:189–194.
  • Pervouchine V, Leedham G. Extraction and analysis of forensic document examiner features used for writer identification. Pattern Recognit. 2007;40:1004–1013.
  • Johnson ME, Vastrick TW, Boulanger M, et al. Measuring the frequency occurrence of handwriting and handprinting characteristics. J Forensic Sci. 2017;62:142–163.
  • Nicholson P. System for the classification of block capital letters. Int J Forensic Doc Exam. 1999;5:138–145.
  • Shakhtarina NI. Forensic handwriting examination with use of data of quantitative significance of private signs of handwriting. Expert Equip. 1968;26:6.
  • Bradford RR, Bradford R. Introduction to handwriting examination and identification. Chicago (IL): Nelson-Hall Publishers; 1992.
  • Ellen D, Day S, Davies C. Scientific examination of documents: methods and techniques. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2018.
  • Hilton O. Scientific examination of questioned documents. Boca Raton (FL): CRC press; 1992.
  • Huber RA, Headrick AM. Handwriting identification: facts and fundamentals. Boca Raton (FL): CRC press; 1999.
  • Kelly JS, Lindblom BS. Scientific examination of questioned documents. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press; 2006.
  • Lewis J. Forensic document examination: fundamentals and current trends. Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsevier; 2014.
  • Morris R, Morris RN. Forensic handwriting identification: fundamental concepts and principles. Cambridge (MA): Academic Press; 2000.
  • Osterburg JW, Parthasarathy T, Raghavan TES, et al. Development of a mathematical formula for the calculation of fingerprint probabilities based on individual characteristics. J Am Stat Assoc. 1977;72:772–778.
  • Aitken CG. Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists. 1996;91:915.