References
- European Council of Legal Medicine (ECML). Description of legal and forensic medicine as a medical specialty in the EU. Aims and objectives for specialist training; [accessed 2021 Jul 15]. Available from: http://eclm.eu/en/documents/description-of-legal-and-forensic-medicine-as-a-medical-specialty-in-the-eu/
- Beran RG. What is legal medicine—are legal and forensic medicine the same? J Forensic Leg Med. 2010;17:137–139.
- Jones AW. Scientometric evaluation of highly cited scientists in the field of forensic science and legal medicine. Int J Legal Med. 2021;135:701–707.
- Abramo G. Revisiting the scientometrics conceptualization of impact and its measurement. J Informetr. 2018;12:590–597.
- Riviera E. Scientific communities as autopoietic systems: the reproductive function of citations. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2013;64:1442–1453.
- Jones AW. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;165:115–128.
- Jones AW. Whither forensic science journals? Forensic Sci Rev. 2021;33:31–37.
- McGrail MR, Rickard CM, Jones R. Publish or perish: a systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. High Educ Res Dev. 2006;25:19–35.
- Hu X, Leydesdorff L, Rousseau R. Exponential growth in the number of items in the WoS. ISSI Newslett. 2020;16:32–38.
- Pritchard A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J Doc. 1969;25:348–349.
- Tsay M, Shu Z. Journal bibliometric analysis: a case study on the journal of documentation. J Doc. 2011;67:806–822.
- Merigó JM, Yang JB. A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega. 2017;73:37–48.
- Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, et al. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021;133:285–296.
- Birkle C, Pendlebury DA, Schnell J, et al. Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quant Sci Stud. 2020;1:363–376.
- Cascajares M, Alcayde A, Salmerón-Manzano E, et al. The bibliometric literature on Scopus and WoS: the medicine and environmental sciences categories as case of study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;8:5851.
- Li K, Rollins J, Yan E. Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics. 2018;115:1–20.
- Pranckutė R. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: the titans of bibliographic information in today’s. Acad World Publ. 2021;9:12.
- Liu W. The data source of this study is Web of Science Core Collection? Not enough. Scientometrics. 2019;121:1815–1824.
- Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 1972;178:471–479.
- Lariviere V, Sugimoto CR. The journal impact factor: a brief history, critique, and discussion of adverse effects. In: Glanzel W, Moed H, Schmoch U, et al., editors. Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2019. p.3–24.
- Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:16569–16572.
- Schubert A, Schubert G. All along the h-index-related literature: a guided tour. In: Glanzel W, Moed H, Schmoch U, et al., editors. Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2019. p.301–334.
- Coronado F, Merigó JM, Cancino C. Business and management research in Latin America: a country-level bibliometric analysis. J Intellig Fuzzy Systems. 2021;40:1865–1875.
- Chasapi A, Promponas VJ, Ouzounis CA. The bioinformatics wealth of nations. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:2963–2965.
- Braun T, Glänzel W, Schubert A. A hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics. 2006;69:169–173.
- Jacsó P. The h-index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus. Online Inf Rev. 2009;33:831–837.
- Orbay M, Karamustafaoglu O, Oner F. What does Hirsch index evolution explain us? A case study. Turk J Chem Biblios. 2007;27:1–5.
- Clarivate Analytics. Web of Science Master Journal List. Categories & collections (scope notes), Web of Science Core Collection; [accessed 2021 Jul 15]. Available from: https://mjl.clarivate.com/help-center
- The hottest in forensics: citations tell whodunnit. Sci Watch. 1995;6:1–4.
- Jones AW. Evaluating the work of forensic scientists by citation analysis. J Forensic Sci. 1995;40:529–530.
- Jones AW. Citation trends and practices in the journal of forensic sciences as documented by ISl’s journal citation report. J Forensic Sci. 1998;43:16165J.
- Jones AW. Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals—what do the numbers really mean? Forensic Sci Int. 2003;133:1–8.
- Jones AW. Which articles and which topics in the forensic sciences are most highly cited? Sci Justice. 2005;45:175–182.
- Sauvageau A, Desnoyers S, Godin A. Mapping the literature in forensic science: a bibliometric study of North American journals from 1980 to 2005. Open Forensic Sci J. 2009;2:41–46.
- Jayapriya R, Sivaraman P. Forensic medicine research output: a bibliometric analysis. AJIST. 2012;2:36–39.
- Ravichandra Rao IK, Raghavan KS, Bhargav KN. Quantitative analysis of scientific literature in forensic science. COLLNET J Scientometr Inform Manage. 2017;11:59–72.
- Tran BX, Pham TV, Ha GH, et al. A bibliometric analysis of the global research trend in child maltreatment. IJERPH. 2018;15:1456.
- Lei G, Liu F, Liu P, et al. Worldwide tendency and focused research in forensic anthropology: a bibliometric analysis of decade (2008–2017). Leg Med (Tokyo). 2019;37:67–75.
- Shi G, Liu N, Yu X, et al. Bibliometric analysis of medical malpractice literature in legal medicine from 1975 to 2018: Web of Science review. J Forensic Leg Med. 2019;66:167–183.
- Lei G, Liu F, Liu P, et al. A bibliometric analysis of forensic entomology trends and perspectives worldwide over the last two decades (1998–2017). Forensic Sci Int. 2019;295:72–82.
- Demir E, Yaşar E, Özkoçak V, et al. The evolution of the field of legal medicine: a holistic investigation of global outputs with bibliometric analysis. J Forensic Leg Med. 2020;69:101885.
- Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84:523–538.
- Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ. 2018;6:e4375.
- Clarivate Analytics. 2021. Web of Science: emerging sources citation index; [accessed 2021 Jul 15]. Available from: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/webofscience-esci/
- Huang Y, Zhu D, Lv Q, et al. Early insights on the emerging sources citation index (ESCI): an overlay map-based bibliometric study. Scientometrics. 2017;111:2041–2057.
- Zhang H, Duarte NV, Shen M. Journals on legal and forensic medicine in Web of Science Core Collection: focus on Forensic Sciences Research. Forensic Sci Res. 2021;6:92–94.
- Miranda R, Garcia-Carpintero E. Overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers. J Informet. 2018;12:1015–1030.
- Falagas ME, Zarkali A, Karageorgopoulos DE, et al. The impact of article length on the number of future citations: a bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e49476.
- Henriksen D. The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013). Scientometrics. 2016;107:455–476.
- Van Noorden R. Interdisciplinary research by the numbers. Nature. 2015;525:306–307.
- Adams J, Pendlebury D, Potter R, et al. 2019. Multi-authorship and research analytics; [accessed 2021 Jul 15]. Available from: https://clarivate.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ISI_-Multiauthorship_Global_Research_Report.pdf
- Kharasch ED, Avram MJ, Bateman BT, et al. Authorship and publication matters: credit and credibility. Anesthesiology. 2021;135:1–8.
- Bennett DM, Taylor DM. Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emerg Med Australas. 2003;15:263–270.
- Althouse BM, West JD, Bergstrom CT, et al. Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 2009;60:27–34.
- Bornmann L, Mutz R. Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. J Assoc Inform Sci Technol. 2015;66:2215–2222.
- Brainard J. Open access takes flight. Science. 2021;371:16–20.
- Else H. Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions. Nature. 2018;561:17–18.
- Piwowar H, Priem J, Orr R. The future of OA: a large-scale analysis projecting open access publication and readership. Biorxiv. 2019:795310.
- Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Houghton Mifflin College Division. 2003. p.63.
- International Monetary Fund (IMF). World economic outlook database, October 2020. World Economic Outlook; 2020.
- Tetroe JM, Graham ID, Foy R, et al. Health research funding agencies’ support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study. Milbank Quarterly. 2008;86:125–155.
- Kwiek M. International research collaboration and international research orientation: comparative findings about European academics. J Stud Int Educ. 2018;22:136–160.
- Bai X, Zhang F, Li J, et al. Quantifying scientific collaboration impact by exploiting collaboration-citation network. Scientometrics. 2021;126:7916–7993.
- Smart JC. Stability of education journal characteristics: 1977–1980. Res High Educ. 1983;19:285–293.
- Aguillo IF. Increasing the between-year stability of the impact factor in the science citation index. Scientometrics. 1996;35:279–282.
- Sutter M, Kocher MG. Tools for evaluating research output: are citation-based rankings of economics journals stable? Eval Rev. 2001;25:555–566.
- Glänzel W, Moed H. Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics. 2002;53:171–193.
- Pajić D. On the stability of citation-based journal rankings. J Informetr. 2015;9:990–1006.
- McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:30–46.
- Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropractic Med. 2016;15:155–163.
- Liu W, Hu G, Gu M. The probability of publishing in first-quartile journals. Scientometrics. 2016;106:1273–1276.
- Liu F, Guo W, Zuo C. High impact factor journals have more publications than expected. Curr Sci. 2018;114:955–956.
- Miranda R, Garcia-Carpintero E. Comparison of the share of documents and citations from different quartile journals in 25 research areas. Scientometrics. 2019;121:479–501.
- Örnek F, Miranda R, Orbay M. Investigating the journal impact factor of special education journals indexed in the social sciences science edition from Web of Science. J Am Acad Spec Educ Profess. 2021:110–132.
- Huang DW. Positive correlation between quality and quantity in academic journals. J Informet. 2016; 10:329–335.
- Allik J, Lauk K, Realo A. Factors predicting the scientific wealth of nations. Cross-Cult Res. 2020; 54:364–397.