Is it possible to use the HCR-20 V2 to assess the risk of violent recidivism of French offenders?

References

• Otto RK, Douglas KS. Handbook of violence risk assessment. New York (UK): Routledge; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun K, Yasuhara K, Shah S. Violence risk assessment tools: overview and critical analysis. In: Otto RK, Douglas KS, editors. Handbook of violence risk assessment. New York (NY): Routledge; 2010. p. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K, Shaw M. Situation risquée: le risque et les services correctionnels au Canada. Crimino. 2002;34:47–72. French.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychol Assess. 2009;21:1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas KS, Skeem JL. Violence risk assessment: getting specific about being dynamic. Psychol, Public Policy, Law. 2005;11:347–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guay J-P, Lafortune D. L’évaluation du risque de récidive et l’intervention basée sur les données probantes: les conditions nécessaires à l’implantation de méthodes structurées d’évaluation et d’intervention efficaces. Prat Psychol. 2015;21:293–303. French.
   Google Scholar
• Côté G. Les instruments d’évaluation du risque de comportements violents: mise en perspective critique. Crimino. 2002;34:31–45. French.
   Google Scholar
• Guay J-P, de Vries Robbé M. L’évaluation des facteurs de protection à l’aide de la SAPROF. Ann Médico-Psychol. 2017;175:894–900. French.
   Google Scholar
• Pham T-H, Ducro C. L’évaluation du risque de récidive. In: Phan FH, editor. L’évaluation psych diagnostique des agresseurs sexuels. Sprimont (Belgium): Mardaga; 2006. p. 111–136. French.
   Google Scholar
• Guay J-P, Benbouriche M, Parent G. L’évaluation structurée du risque de récidive des personnes placées sous-main de justice: Méthodes et enjeux. Prat Psychol. 2015;21:235–257. French.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews DA, Bonta J. The psychology of criminal conduct. 5th ed. New York (NY): Routledge; 2010. French.
   Google Scholar
• Quinsey VL, Lalumière ML, Rice ME, et al. Predicting sexual offenses. Assessing dangerousness: violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 1995. p. 114–137.
   Google Scholar
• Webster CD, Douglas KS, Eaves D, et al. HCR-20: assessing risk for violence, version 2. Burnaby (Canada): Simon Fraser University; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Singh JP, Desmarais SL, Hurducas C, et al. International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: a global survey of 44 countries. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 2014;13:193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas KS, Webster CD. The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: concurrent validity in a sample of incarcerated offenders. Crim Just Behav. 1999;26:3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel SF, Riaz M, Webster C, et al. Using the HCR-20 to predict aggressive behavior among men with schizophrenia living in the community: accuracy of prediction, general and forensic settings, and dynamic risk factors. Int J Forens Mental Health. 2013;12:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas KS, Yeomans M, Boer DP. Comparative validity analysis of multiple measures of violence risk in a sample of criminal offenders. Crim Just Behav. 2005;32:479–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M, Wong SCP, Coid J. The efficacy of violence prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychol Bull. 2010;136:740–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster CD, Eaves D, Douglas KS, et al. The HCR-20 scheme: the assessment of dangerousness and risk (version 1). Burnaby (Canada): Simon Fraser University and Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission of British Columbia; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas KS, Hart SD, Webster CD, et al. HCR- 20 V3: assessing risk for violence — user guide. Burnaby (Canada): Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Boer DP, Hart SD, Kropp PR, et al. Manual for the sexual violence risk-20: professional guidelines for assessing the risk of sexual violence. Vancouver (Canada): British Columbia Institute on Family Violence and Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hart SD, Kropp PR, Laws DR, et al. The risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP): structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Burnaby (Canada): Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Claix A, Pham T-H. Evaluation of the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme in a Belgian forensic population. Encephale. 2004;30:447–453.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Douglas KS, Ogloff J, Hart SD. Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54:1372–1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare RD. The Hare psychopathy checklist — revised. Toronto (Canada): Multi-Health Systems; 2003. French.
   Google Scholar
• Mouchet-Mages S, Vittoz A, Braq-Leca H, et al. Apport des outils de jugement clinique structuré pour la mise en place d’un programme de soins individualisé des auteurs de violences sexuelles. Ann Médico-Psychol. 2018;176:100–102. French.
   Google Scholar
• Crampagne S. L’évaluation de la dangerosité dans le cadre de l’expertise psychiatrique pénale Thèse de doctorat en médecine. Médecine humaine et pathologie, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Webster CD, Grenier M, Crocker AG. Évaluation du risque à court terme et traitabilité: un guide d’évaluation et de planification. Montréal (Canada): Institut universitaire en santé mentale; 2007. French.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke DJ, Michie C, Ryan J. Evaluating risk for violence: a preliminary study of the HCR-20, PCL-R and VRAG in a Scottish prison sample. Edimbourg (UK): Report prepared for the Scottish Prison Service; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Guy LS. Performance indicators of the structured professional judgment approach for assessing risk for violence to others: a meta-analytic survey (Thesis). Burnaby (Canada): Simon Fraser University; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews DA, Bonta JL, Wormith JS. The level of service/case management inventory (LS/CMI). Crime Delinq. Toronto (Canada): Multi-Health Systems; 2004;7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Guay J-P. L’évaluation du risque et des besoins criminogènes à la lumière des données probantes: Une étude de validation de la version française de l’inventaire de niveau de service et de gestion des cas—LS/CMI. Euro Rev Appl Psychol. 2016;66:199–210. French.
   Google Scholar
• Labrecque RM, Campbell CM, Elliott J, et al. An examination of the inter-rater reliability and rater accuracy of the level of service/case management inventory. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research. 2018;3:105–118.
   Google Scholar
• Jung S, Brown K, Ennis L, et al. The association between presentence risk evaluations and sentencing outcome. Appl Psychol Crim Just. 2015;11:111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeem JL, Winter E, Kennealy PJ, Louden JE, et al. Offenders with mental illness have criminogenic needs, too: toward recidivism reduction. Law Hum Behav. 2014;38:212–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Sinna R, Luebbers S. Validity of assessing people experiencing mental illness who have offended using the Camberwell Assessment of Need-Forensic and Health of the Nation Outcome Scales-Secure. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2012;21:462–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Durham (SC): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Pham T-H, Ducro C, Marghem B, et al. Évaluation du risque de récidive au sein d’une population de délinquants incarcérés ou internés en belgique francophone. Ann Médico-Psychol. 2005;163:842–845.
   Google Scholar
• Cartuyvels Y. L’internement de défense sociale en belgique: entre soin, dangerosité et sécurité. L’information Psychiat. 2017;93:93–101. French.
   Google Scholar
• Vicenzutto A, Dujardin J, Delannoy D, et al. Expertise psychiatrique au pénal: apports des canevas structurés d’expertise. Ann Médico-Psychol. 2019;177:892–895. French.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T. A general theory of crime. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Loeber R, Stouthamer-Loeber M. A cumulative developmental model of risk and promotive factors. Tomorrow’s criminals: the development of child delinquency and effective interventions. Farnham (UK): Taylor & Francis Group; 2008;133–164.
   Google Scholar
• Spanjaard HJM, Knaap L. v d, Put C. v d, et al. Risk assessment and the impact of risk and protective factors. In: Loeber R, Hoeve M, Slot NW, et al. editors. Persisters and desisters in crime from adolescence into adulthood: explanation, prevention and punishment. Farnham (CA): Ashgate; 2012. p. 127–158.
   Google Scholar
• Seto MC, Babchishin KM, Pullman LE, et al. The puzzle of intrafamilial child sexual abuse: a meta-analysis comparing intrafamilial and extrafamilial offenders with child victims. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;39:42–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson RK, Scott H, Steffy RA. A comparison of child molesters and nonsexual criminals: risk predictors and long-term recidivism. J Res Crime Delinq. 1995;32:325–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham T-H, Chevrier I, Nioche A, et al. Évaluation du risque, prise en charge. Ann Médico-Psychol. 2005;163:878–881. French.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfrage H. Implementing the HCR-20 scheme for risk assessment in a forensic psychiatric hospital: integrating research and clinical practice. J Forens Psychiat. 1998;9:328–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78:98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guay J-P. Évaluer le risque de récidive: un état de la recherche et des principaux enjeux pratiques. Paris (France): Conférence de consensus; 2012. French.
   Google Scholar
• Logan C. The HCR-20 version 3: a case study in risk formulation. Int J Forens Mental Health. 2014;13:172–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartuyvels Y, Champetier B, Wyvekens A. La défense sociale en belgique, entre soin et sécurité. Deviance et Societe. 2010;34:615–645. French.
   Google Scholar