Publication Cover
Mycology
An International Journal on Fungal Biology
Volume 15, 2024 - Issue 2
1,191
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Call me by your name: Considerations of DNA sequences as types within wider discussions on fungal nomenclature

ORCID Icon
Pages 137-143 | Received 20 Sep 2023, Accepted 11 Dec 2023, Published online: 25 Dec 2023

References

  • Abramowitz AI, Saunders KL. 2008. Is polarization a myth? J Polit. 70(2):542–555. doi: 10.1017/S0022381608080493.
  • Abramowitz AI, Stone WJ. 2006. The Bush effect: Polarization, turnout, and activism in the 2004 presidential election. Pres Stud Q. 36(2):141–154. doi: 10.1111/J.1741-5705.2006.00295.X.
  • BBSRC, MRC. 2014. London: UK research and innovation. BBSRC and MRC review of vulnerable skills and capabilities. [accessed 2023 Sep 4]. https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/BBSRC-13102021-BBSRC-MRC-VulnerableCapabilties-Report.pdf.
  • Bridges PD, Hughes KA. 2012. Nomenclatural novelties. Index Fungorum. 7:1.
  • Ceríaco LMP, Aescht E, Ahyong ST, Ballerio A, Bouchard P, Bourgoin T, Dmitriev D, Evenhuis N, Grygier MJ, Harvey MS, et al. 2023. Renaming taxa on ethical grounds threatens nomenclatural stability and scientific communication: Communication from the international commission on zoological nomenclature. Zool J Linn Soc. 197(2):283–286. doi:10.1093/ZOOLINNEAN/ZLAC107.
  • de Beer ZW, Marincowitz S, Duong TA, Kim JJ, Rodrigues A, Wingfield MJ. 2016. Hawksworthiomyces gen. nov. (Ophiostomatales), illustrates the urgency for a decision on how to name novel taxa known only from environmental nucleic acid sequences (ENAS). Fungal Biol. 120(11):1323–1340. doi: 10.1016/J.FUNBIO.2016.07.004.
  • Figueiredo E, Smith GF. 2010. What’s in a name: epithets in Aloe L. (Asphodelaceae) and what to call the next new species. Bradleya. 2010(28):79–102. doi: 10.25223/BRAD.N28.2010.A9.
  • Freitag H, Pangantihon CV, Njunjić I. 2018. Three new species of Grouvellinus Champion, 1923 from Maliau Basin, Sabah, Borneo, discovered by citizen scientists during the first Taxon expedition (insecta, coleoptera, elmidae). ZooKeys. 754:1–21. doi: 10.3897/ZOOKEYS.754.24276.
  • Friedersdorf. 2011. Remembering why Americans loathe Dick Cheney. The Atlantic. accessed 2023 Sep 4. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/08/remembering-why-americans-loathe-dick-cheney/244306/.
  • Gillman LN, Wright SD. 2020. Restoring indigenous names in taxonomy. Commun Biol. 3(1):609. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01344-y.
  • Gosline G, Cheek M, Onana JM, Tchatchouang EN, Van Der Burgt XM, MacKinnon L, LPMJ D. 2022. Uvariopsis dicaprio (annonaceae) a new tree species with notes on its pollination biology, and the critically endangered narrowly endemic plant species of the Ebo Forest, Cameroon. PeerJ. 9:e12614. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12614.
  • Grossart HP, Wurzbacher C, James TY, Kagami M. 2016. Discovery of dark matter fungi in aquatic ecosystems demands a reappraisal of the phylogeny and ecology of zoosporic fungi. Fungal Ecol. 19:28–38. doi: 10.1016/J.FUNECO.2015.06.004.
  • Guedes P, Alves-Martins F, Arribas JM, Chatterjee S, Santos AMC, Lewin A, Bako L, Webala PW, Correia RA, Rocha R, et al. 2023. Eponyms have no place in 21st-century biological nomenclature. Nat Ecol Evol. 7(8):1157–1160. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02022-y.
  • Hammer TA, Thiele KR. 2021. (119–122) proposals to amend articles 51 and 56 and division III, to allow the rejection of culturally offensive and inappropriate names. Taxon. 70(6):1392–1394. doi: 10.1002/TAX.12620.
  • Hawksworth DL, Hibbett DS, Kirk PM, Lücking R. 2016. (308–310) proposals to permit DNA sequence data to serve as types of names of fungi. Taxon. 65(4):899–900. doi: 10.12705/654.31.
  • Hibbett DS, Ohman A, Glotzer D, Nuhn M, Kirk P, Nilsson RH. 2011. Progress in molecular and morphological taxon discovery in fungi and options for formal classification of environmental sequences. Fungal Biol Rev. 25(1):38–47. doi: 10.1016/J.FBR.2011.01.001.
  • Hibbett DS, Ohman A, Kirk PM. 2009. Fungal ecology catches fire. New Phytol. 184(2):279–282. doi: 10.1111/J.1469-8137.2009.03042.X.
  • Karasz P 2019. John Cleese suggests London isn’t ‘really an English city’. The New York Times. [accessed 2023 Sep 4]. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/30/world/europe/john-cleese-london.html.
  • Khan FK, Kluting K, Tångrot J, Urbina H, Ammunet T, Eshghi Sahraei S, Rydén M, Ryberg M, Rosling A. 2020. Naming the untouchable – environmental sequences and niche partitioning as taxonomical evidence in fungi. IMA Fungus. 11(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/S43008-020-00045-9.
  • Kirk PM. 2012. Nomenclatural novelties. Index Fungorum. 1:1.
  • Knapp DG, Kovács GM, Zajta E, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. 2015. Dark septate endophytic pleosporalean genera from semiarid areas. Pers Mol Phylogeny Evol Fungi. 35(1):87–100. doi: 10.3767/003158515X687669.
  • Knapp S, Vorontsova MS, Turland NJ. 2020. Indigenous species names in algae, fungi and plants: A comment on Gillman & Wright (2020). Taxon. 69(6):1409–1410. doi: 10.1002/tax.12411.
  • Lessard BD, Yeates DK. 2011. New species of the Australian horse fly subgenus scaptia (Plinthina) walker 1850 (Diptera: tabanidae), including species descriptions and a revised key. Aust J Entomol. 50(3):241–252. doi: 10.1111/J.1440-6055.2011.00809.X.
  • Lücking R. 2019. Stop the abuse of time! Strict temporal banding is not the future of rank-based classifications in fungi (including lichens) and other organisms. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 38(3):199–253. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2019.1650517.
  • Lücking R, Aime MC, Robbertse B, Miller AN, Aoki T, Ariyawansa HA, Cardinali G, Crous PW, Druzhinina IS, Geiser DM, et al. 2021. Fungal taxonomy and sequence-based nomenclature. Nature Microbiology. 6(5):540–548. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00888-x.
  • Lücking R, Hawksworth DL. 2018. Formal description of sequence-based voucherless fungi: Promises and pitfalls, and how to resolve them. IMA Fungus. 9:1 9(1):143–165. doi: 10.5598/IMAFUNGUS.2018.09.01.09.
  • Lücking R, Kirk PM, Hawksworth DL. 2018. Sequence-based nomenclature: a reply to Thines et al. And Zamora et al. And provisions for an amended proposal “from the floor” to allow DNA sequences as types of names. IMA Fungus. 9(1):185–198. doi: 10.5598/IMAFUNGUS.2018.09.01.12.
  • Lücking R, Moncada B. 2017. Dismantling Marchandiomphalina into Agonimia (verrucariaceae) and Lawreymyces gen. nov. (corticiaceae): Setting a precedent to the formal recognition of thousands of voucherless fungi based on type sequences. Fungal Divers. 84(1):119–138. doi: 10.1007/S13225-017-0382-4.
  • Mabele MB, Kiwango WA, Mwanyoka I. 2023. Disrupting the epistemic empire is necessary for a decolonial ecology. Nat Ecol Evol. 7(8):1163. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02105-w.
  • Mammola S, Viel N, Amiar D, Mani A, Hervé C, Heard SB, Fontaneto D, Pétillon J. 2023. Taxonomic practice, creativity and fashion: What’s in a spider name? Zool J Linn Soc. 198(2):494–508. doi: 10.1093/ZOOLINNEAN/ZLAC097.
  • May TW, Miller AN. 2018. XI International mycological congress: Guiding vote on nomenclature proposals to amend chapter F of the International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. IMA Fungus. 9(2):xv–xxi. doi: 10.1007/BF03449447.
  • May TW, Redhead SA. 2018. Synopsis of proposals on fungal nomenclature: A review of the proposals concerning chapter F of the International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants submitted to the XI international mycological congress. IMA Fungus. 9(1):ix–xiv. doi: 10.1007/BF03449482.
  • Miller KB, Wheeler QD. 2005. Slime-mold beetles of the genus agathidium panzer in north and central America, part II. Coleoptera: Leiodidae. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 2005(291):1–167. doi: 10.1206/0003-0090(2005)291<0001:SBOTGA>2.0.CO;2.
  • Mills J 2016. BEY-OND AWFUL exposed: Sweatshop ‘slaves’ earning just 44p an hour making ‘empowering’ Beyonce clobber. The sun on Sunday. [accessed 2023 Sep 4]. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1176905/exposed-sweatshop-slaves-earning-just-44p-an-hour-making-empowering-beyonce-clobber/.
  • Mlynarek JJ, Cull C, Parachnowitsch AL, Vickruck JL, Heard SB. 2023. Can species naming drive scientific attention? A perspective from plant-feeding arthropods. Proc Biol Sci. 290(1992):20222187. doi: 10.1098/RSPB.2022.2187.
  • Mosyakin SL. 2022a. Defending art. 51 of the code: Comments on Smith & al. (2022). Taxon. 71(6):1141–1150. doi: 10.1002/TAX.12820.
  • Mosyakin SL. 2022b. If “Rhodes-” must fall, who shall fall next? Taxon. 71(2):249–255. doi: 10.1002/TAX.12659.
  • Mosyakin SL, Alford MH. 2022. (2888) proposal to conserve the name Osmelia against Stachycrater (Samydaceae / Salicaceae s.L.). Taxon. 71(2):483–484. doi: 10.1002/tax.12707.
  • Nilsson RH, Ryberg M, Wurzbacher C, Tedersoo L, Anslan S, Põlme S, Spirin V, Mikryukov V, Svantesson S, Hartmann M, et al. 2023. How, not if, is the question mycologists should be asking about DNA-based typification. MycoKeys. 96:143–157. doi: 10.3897/MYCOKEYS.96.102669.
  • Nissen A 2016. Sweating in the park or in the factory: Beyonce's new sports wear company and respect for human rights. Oxford Human Rights Hub. [accessed 2023 Sep 4]. https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/sweating-in-the-park-or-in-the-factory-beyonces-new-sports-wear-company-and-respect-for-human-rights/.
  • Page RDM. 2016. DNA barcoding and taxonomy: Dark taxa and dark texts. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 371(1702):20150334. doi: 10.1098/RSTB.2015.0334.
  • Pallen MJ, Telatin A, Oren A. 2021. The next million names for Archaea and bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 29(4):289–298. doi: 10.1016/J.TIM.2020.10.009.
  • Pethiyagoda R. 2023. Policing the scientific lexicon: The new colonialism? Megataxa. 10(1):20–25. doi: 10.11646/megataxa.10.1.4.
  • Poulin R, McDougall C, Presswell B. 2022. What’s in a name? Taxonomic and gender biases in the etymology of new species names. Proc Biol Sci. 289(1974). doi: 10.1098/RSPB.2021.2708.
  • Rao TR. 2022. So, you discovered a new species?: How do you know, and what are you going to name it? Resonance. 27(6):921–939. doi: 10.1007/S12045-022-1389-Z.
  • Roksandic M, Musiba C, Radović P, Lindal J, Wu XJ, Figueiredo E, Smith GF, Roksandic I, Bae CJ. 2023. Change in biological nomenclature is overdue and possible. Nat Ecol Evol. 7(8):1166–1167. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02104-x.
  • Romero-Jiménez MJ, Rudgers JA, Jumpponen A, Herrera J, Hutchinson M, Kuske C, Dunbar J, Knapp DG, Kovács GM, Porras-Alfaro A. 2022. Darksidea phi, sp. nov., a dark septate root-associated fungus in foundation grasses in North American Great Plains. Mycologia. 114(2):254–269. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2022.2031780.
  • Smith GF, Figueiredo E. 2021. (126) proposal to add a new article 61.6 to permanently and retroactively eliminate epithets with the root caf[e]r- or caff[e]r- from the nomenclature of algae, fungi and plants. Taxon. 70(6):1395–1396. doi: 10.1002/TAX.12622.
  • Smith GF, Figueiredo E. 2022. “Rhodes-” must fall: Some of the consequences of colonialism for botany and plant nomenclature. Taxon. 71(1):1–5. doi: 10.1002/TAX.12598.
  • Smith GF, Figueiredo E. 2023. A review and analysis of the use of epithets in infrageneric, species, and infraspecific names in Kalanchoe (crassulaceae subfam. Kalanchooideae): Trends in the plant naming game. Phytotaxa. 618(3):213–242. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.618.3.1.
  • Smith GF, Figueiredo E, Hammer TA, Thiele KR. 2022. Dealing with inappropriate honorifics in a structured and defensible way is possible. Taxon. 71(5):933–935. doi: 10.1002/TAX.12742.
  • Stine A 2022. Dating Leonard DiCaprio: What his history of younger girlfriends may say about him and about us. Salon. [accessed 2023 Sep 4]. https://www.salon.com/2022/09/15/dating-leonard-dicaprio-gigi-hadid-age-gap/.
  • Thalmann U, Geissmann T. 2005. New species of Woolly Lemur Avahi (Primates: Iemuriformes) in Bemaraha (Central Western Madagascar). Am J Primatol. 67(3):371–376. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20191.
  • Thiele KR, Smith GF, Figueiredo E, Hammer TA. 2022. Taxonomists have an opportunity to rid botanical nomenclature of inappropriate honorifics in a structured and defensible way. Taxon. 71(6):1151–1154. doi: 10.1002/TAX.12821.
  • Thines M, Crous PW, Aime MC, Aoki T, Cai L, Hyde KD, Miller AN, Zhang N, Stadler M. 2018. Ten Reasons why a sequence-based nomenclature is not useful for fungi anytime soon. IMA Fungus. 9(1):177–183. doi: 10.5598/IMAFUNGUS.2018.09.01.11.
  • Tracy BH. 2022. What’s in a fish species name and when to change it? Fisheries (Bethesda). 47(8):337–345. doi: 10.1002/FSH.10750.
  • Turland NJ, Wiersema, JH, Barrie, FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Knapp PS, Kusber WH, Li DZ, Marhold K, MayTW, et al., editors. 2018. International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen code) adopted by the nineteenth International Botanical Congress. Shenzhen, China: Glashütten: Koeltz Botanical Books.
  • Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Monro AM, Deng YF, Zhang L. 2017. XIX International Botanical Congress: Report of congress action XIX International Botanical Congress: Report of Congress action on nomenclature proposals. Taxon. 66(5):1234–1245. doi: 10.12705/665.16.
  • Vendetti J. 2022. Gender representation in Molluscan Eponyms: Disparities and legacy. Am Malacol Bull. 39(1):1–13. doi: 10.4003/006.039.0106.
  • Wright SD, Gillman LN. 2022. Replacing current nomenclature with pre-existing indigenous names in algae, fungi and plants. Taxon. 71(1):6–10. doi: 10.1002/TAX.12599.
  • Wu B, Hussain M, Zhang W, Stadler M, Liu X, Xiang M. 2019. Current insights into fungal species diversity and perspective on naming the environmental DNA sequences of fungi. Mycology. 10(3):127–140. doi: 10.1080/21501203.2019.1614106.
  • Zamora JC, Svensson M, Kirschner R, Olariaga I, Ryman S, Parra LA, Geml J, Rosling A, Adamčík S, Ahti T, et al. 2018. Considerations and consequences of allowing DNA sequence data as types of fungal taxa. IMA Fungus. 9(1):167–175. doi: 10.5598/IMAFUNGUS.2018.09.01.10.