Evaluating Effectiveness in a Hispanic-Serving Counselor Training Clinic

References

• American Counseling Association. (2014). ACA code of ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, H., Hagedorn, W. B., & Robinson, E. H. (2016). An exploration of supervisory and therapeutic relationships and client outcomes. Counselor Education and Supervision, 55, 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12044
   Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G. M., Wells, G. M., Lambert, M. J., & Cox, J. (2004). The Youth Outcome Questionnaire. In M. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological tests for treatment planning and outcome assessment (3rd ed.) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., & Hemsley, S. (2009). Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale in psychological practice: Clinical utility of ultra-brief measures. Clinical Psychologist, 13, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13284200802676391
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/ 2909.112.1.155
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, B. (2011). The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS): Administration, scoring, interpreting update for the Outcome and Session Ratings Scale. Jensen Beach, FL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, B. L. (2012). The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS): The heart and soul of change project. Canadian Psychology, 53, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027762
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. (2007). The Group Session Rating scale. Jensen Beach, FL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., Sparks, J. A., Claud, D. A., Reynolds, L. R., & Brown, J. (2003). The Session Rating Scale: Preliminary psychometric properties of a working alliance measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 3, 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., Sparks, J. A., & Johnson, L. D. (2003). Child Session Rating Scale. Jensen Beach, FL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, B. L., & Reese, R. J. (2013). Clinical and scientific considerations in progress monitoring: When is a measure too long? Canadian Psychology, 54, 135–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032362
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The effects of psychotherapy: An evaluation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16, 319. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063633
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gillaspy, J. A., & Murphy, J. J. (2011). The use of ultra-brief client feedback tools in SFBT. In C. W. Franklin, T. Trepper, E. McCollum, & W. Gingerich (Eds.), Solution-focused brief therapy (pp. 73–94). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2009). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (8th ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Hafkenscheid, A., Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. D. (2010). The outcome and session rating scales: A cross-cultural examination of the psychometric properties of the Dutch translation. Journal of Brief Therapy, 7(1&2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, C., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D., Shimokawa, K. W., & Sutton, S. W. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 61, 155–163.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, N. B., Lambert, M. J., & Forman, E. V. (2002). The psychotherapy dose–response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 329–343.
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, R. L., & Gillaspy, J. A. (2006). Development and validation of a revised short version of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300500352500
   Google Scholar
• Heppner, P. P., Rosenberg, J. I., & Hedgespeth, J. (1992). Three methods in measuring the therapeutic process: Clients' and counselors' constructions of the therapeutic process versus actual therapeutic events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.39.1.20
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., Umphress, V., Hansen, N. B., Vermeersch, D. A., & Clouse, G. C. (1996). The reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 3, 249–258.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., & Hills, C. E. (1994). Assessing psychotherapy outcomes and processes. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 72–113). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, W., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, S. C., Tschitsaz, A., Schürch, E., & Stulz, N. (2006). The probability of treatment success, failure and duration—What can be learned from empirical data to support decision making in clinical practice? Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 13, 223–232.
   Google Scholar
• Mash, E. J., & Hunsley, J. (1993). Assessment considerations in the identification of failing psychotherapy: Bringing the negatives out of the darkroom. Psychological Assessment, 5, 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.3.292
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. D., & Duncan, B. L. (2004). The Outcome and Session Rating Scales: Administration and scoring manual. Jensen Beach, FL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., Brown, J., Sparks, J. A., & Claud, D. E. (2003). The Outcome Rating Scale: A preliminary study of the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a brief visual analog measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 2, 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, R. J., Duncan, B. L., Bohanske, R. T., Owen, J. J., & Minami, T. (2014). Benchmarking outcomes in a public behavioral health setting: Feedback as a quality improvement strategy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036915731
   Google Scholar
• Reese, R. J., Norsworthy, L. A., & Rowlands, S. R. (2009). Does a continuous feedback system improve psychotherapy outcome? Psycho-therapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46, 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017901
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). QuickFacts: Bexar County, Texas. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/48029
   Google Scholar
• Walfish, S., McAlister, B., O'Donnell, P., & Lambert, M. (2012). An investigation into self-assessment bias in mental health providers. Psychological Reports, 110, 639–644. https://doi.org/10.2466/02.07.17.PR0.110.2.639-644
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, M., Cheng, H., & Deighton, J. (2015). Measurement issues: Review of four patient reported outcome measures: SDQ, RCADS, C/ORS and GBO—Their strengths and limitations for clinical use and service evaluation. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12065
   Google Scholar
• Worthen, V. E., & Lambert, M. J. (2007). Outcome orientated supervision: Advantages of adding systematic client tracking to supportive consultations. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 7, 48–53.
   Google Scholar