Scoping Review Methodology: A Practical Guide for Counseling Researchers

References

• Aafjes-van Doorn, K., Nissen, K. J., & Chen, Z. (2022). Learning styles in counseling: A scoping review of the empirical evidence. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 35(3), 562–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2021.1908961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Borders, L. D., Dianna, J. A., & McKibben, W. B. (2023). Clinical supervisor training: A ten- year scoping review across counseling, psychology, and social work. The Clinical Supervisor, 42(1), 164–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2023.2188624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A., Barker, E. D., & Rahman, Q. (2020). A systematic scoping review of the prevalence, etiological, psychological, and interpersonal factors associated with BDSM. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(6), 781–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1665619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cénat, J. M., Broussard, C., Jacob, G., Kogan, C., Corace, K., Ukwu, G., Onesi, O., Furyk, S. E., Bekarkhanechi, F. M., Williams, M., Chomienne, M.-H., Grenier, J., & Labelle, P. R. (2024). Antiracist training programs for mental health professionals: A scoping review. Clinical Psychology Review, 108, 102373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, K., Snow, W., & Hinkle, S. (2021). The past, present and future of online counselor education. Journal of Technology in Counselor Education and Supervision, 1(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.22371/tces/0006
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S., Cant, R., Kelly, M., Levett-Jones, T., McKenna, L., Seaton, P., & Bogossian, F. (2021). An evidence-based checklist for improving scoping review quality. Clinical Nursing Research, 30(3), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773819846024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council for the Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP). (2023). 2024 CACREP standards. https://www.cacrep.org/news/2024-cacrep-standards/
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R., Campbell, R., Hildon, Z., Hobbs, L., & Michie, S. (2015). Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: A scoping review. Health Psychology Review, 9(3), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.941722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daza, V., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Lund, A. (2021). Partnerships as third spaces for professional practice in initial teacher education: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drosatos, G., & Kaldoudi, E. (2019). Blockchain applications in the biomedical domain: A scoping review. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 17, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2019.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore, S. M., Salas, E., Cuevas, H. M., & Bowers, C. A. (2003). Distributed coordination space: Toward a theory of distributed team process and performance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 4(3-4), 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922021000049971
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, S. K. (1995). Counselor education and training in research: Are counseling students being short-changed? TCA Journal, 23(2), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564223.1995.12034455
   Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A. (2018). Writing empirical articles: Transparency, reproducibility, clarity, and memorability. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754485
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Generali, M. M., Foss-Kelley, L. L., & McNamara, K. (2013). Barriers to evidence-based counseling Practices: A counselor educator training model. VISTAS Online, Article 30. https://www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/vistas/barriers-to-evidence-based-counseling-practices-a-counselor-educator-training-model.pdf?sfvrsn=4
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, K. D., & Schmalz, K. J. (2004). The matrix method of literature reviews. Health Promotion Practice, 5(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839903258885
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greidanus, E., Warren, C., Harris, G. E., & Umetsubo, Y. (2020). Collaborative practice in counselling: A scoping review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 34(3), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1637334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, G. E., & Flood, K. A. (2015). Teaching counselling theory and skills: A scoping review of Canadian graduate counselling psychology coursework. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 49(3), 201–213. https://cjc-rcc.ucalgary.ca/article/view/61038
   Google Scholar
• Jalali, S., & Wohlin, C. (2012). Systematic literature studies: Database searches vs. backward snowballing [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (pp. 29–38). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kastner, M., Tricco, A. C., Soobiah, C., Lillie, E., Perrier, L., Horsley, T., Welch, V., Cogo, E., Antony, J., & Straus, S. E. (2012). What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiani, A. K., Naureen, Z., Pheby, D., Henehan, G., Brown, R., … & Sieving, P, International Bioethics Study Group. (2022). Methodology for clinical research. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 63(2 Suppl 3), E267. https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.2S3.2769
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klopper, R., Lubbe, S., & Rugbeer, H. (2007). The matrix method of literature review. Alternation, 14, 262–276. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/3002
   Google Scholar
• Knowledge Translation Program. (2023). Right Review. https://whatreviewisrightforyou.knowledgetranslation.net/
   Google Scholar
• Lamar, M. R., & Sheperis, D. (2021). Virtual research conference presentations: A research course assignment students love. Journal of Technology in Counselor Education and Supervision, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.22371/tces/0005
   Google Scholar
• Lambie, G. W., & Vaccaro, N. (2011). Doctoral counselor education students’ levels of research self-efficacy, perceptions of the research training environment, and interest in research. Counselor Education and Supervision, 50(4), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2011.tb00122.x
   Google Scholar
• Levy, I. P., Edirmanasinghe, N., Ieva, K., & Hilliard, C. (2023). Youth participatory action research as school counseling praxis: A scoping review. Professional School Counseling, 27(1a), 2156759X2311533. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X231153347
   Google Scholar
• Litherland, G., & Schulthes, G. (2020). Research Focused on Doctoral-Level Counselor Education: A Scoping Review. The Professional Counselor, 10(4), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.15241/gl.10.4.414
   Google Scholar
• Litherland, G., Schulthes, G., Ewe, E., Kayij-Wint, K., & Ng, K.-M. (2023). Mentorship in Counselor Education: A Scoping Review. Teaching and Supervision in Counseling, 5(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc05i2is
   Google Scholar
• Litherland, G., Schulthes, G., & Muzacz, A. (2021 Scoping reviews: A methodological and reporting primer for counseling researchers [Conference presentation]. AARC 2021 Conference, Cincinnati, OH. September 10.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, C., Dos Santos, K. B., & Pap, R. (2019). Practical guidance for knowledge synthesis: Scoping review methods. Asian Nursing Research, 13(5), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2019.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, K. M., Bahner, A. D., Jones, L. N., & Nilsson, J. E. (2007). An investigation of early research experience and research self-efficacy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(3), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.38.3.314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundervold, D. A., & Belwood, M. F. (2000). The best kept secret in counseling: Single-case (N = 1) experimental designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2000.tb02565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manookian, A., Dehghan Nayeri, N., & Shahmari, M. (2022). Physical problems of prolonged use of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Nursing Forum, 57(5), 874–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., Sutton, A., O’Keefe, H., Johnson, E. (Eds.) (2022). The systematic review toolbox. http://www.systematicreviewtools.com/
   Google Scholar
• Maximo, S. I. (2019). A scoping review of ethical considerations in spiritual/religious counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling: Advancing Theory and Professional Practice through Scholarly and Reflective Publications, 73(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1542305019848656
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, J., Straus, S., Moher, D., Langlois, E. V., O’Brien, K. K., Horsley, T., Aldcroft, A., Zarin, W., Garitty, C. M., Hempel, S., Lillie, E., Tunçalp, Ӧ., & Tricco, A. C. (2020). Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 123, 177–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMorrow, S. (2017). What gets in the way? Examining the breakdown between research and practice in counseling. Counseling Today, Mar 22. https://ct.counseling.org/2017/03/gets-way-examining-breakdown-research-practice-counseling/#
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E., & Colquhoun, H. (2020). The importance and value of reporting guidance for scoping reviews: A rehabilitation science example. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(4), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.3316/INFORMIT.569703114845917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A, PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L. (Ed.). (2013). Handbook of causal analysis for social research. Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., Pollock, D., Khalil, H., Alexander, L., Mclnerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., Peters, M., & Tricco, A. C. (2022). What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 20(4), 950–952. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00483
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, T. M., Chang, C. Y., & Dispenza, F. (2018). Qualitative clinical mental health program evaluation: Models and implications for counseling practitioners and educators. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 40(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.40.1.01
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health Library (n.d). Literature search: Databases and gray literature. Systematic Review Service. https://www.nihlibrary.nih.gov/services/systematic-review-service/literature-search-databases-and-gray-literature
   Google Scholar
• Newhart, S., Mullen, P. R., Blount, A. J., & Hagedorn, W. B. (2020). Factors influencing publication rates among counselor educators. Teaching and Supervision in Counseling, 2(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc020105
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Baxter, L., Tricco, A. C., Straus, S., Wickerson, L., Nayar, A., Moher, D., & O’Malley, L. (2016). Advancing scoping study methodology: A web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps. BMC Health Services Research, 16(1), 305. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1579-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okonofua, F. E., Ntoimo, L. F. C., Omonkhua, A., Ayodeji, O., Olafusi, C., Unuabonah, E., & Ohenhen, V. (2022). Causes and risk factors for male infertility: A scoping review of published studies. International Journal of General Medicine, 15, 5985–5997. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S363959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paez, A. (2017). Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 10(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. D., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, D., Davies, E. L., Peters, M. D. J., Tricco, A. C., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., & Munn, Z. (2021). Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(4), 2102–2113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potterton, R., Richards, K., Allen, K., & Schmidt, U. (2020). Eating disorders during emerging adulthood: A systematic scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3062. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRISMA. (2024). PRISMA. Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. http://prisma-statement.org/prismastatement/flowdiagram.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Quitmann, C., Griesel, S., Schwerdtle, P. N., Danquah, I., & Herrmann, A. (2023). Climate-sensitive health counselling: A scoping review and conceptual framework. The Lancet Planetary Health, 7(7), e600–e610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00107-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ratts, M. J., & Pedersen, P. B. (2014). Counseling for multiculturalism and social justice: Integration, theory, and application. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sataloff, R. T., Bush, M. L., Chandra, R., Chepeha, D., Rotenberg, B., Fisher, E. W., Goldenberg, D., Hanna, E. Y., Kerschner, J. E., Kraus, D. H., Krouse, J. H., Li, D., Link, M., Lustig, L. R., Selesnick, S. H., Sindwani, R., Smith, R. J., Tysome, J., Weber, P. C., & Welling, D. B. (2021). Systematic and other reviews: Criteria and complexities. Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 50(1), 1–4. https://journalotohns.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40463-021-00527-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmit, M. K., & Giordano, A. L. (2021). Advancing the counseling profession through research and publication. Journal of Counseling & Development, 99(2), 119–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheperis, C. J., Young, J. S., & Daniels, M. (2020). Counseling research. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, W. H., Lamar, M. R., Hinkle, J. S., & Speciale, M. (2018). Current practices in online counselor education. The Professional Counselor, 8(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.15241/whs.8.2.131
   Google Scholar
• Sohrabi, C., Franchi, T., Mathew, G., Kerwan, A., Nicola, M., Griffin, M., Agha, M., & Agha, R. (2021). PRISMA 2020 statement: What’s new and the importance of reporting guidelines. International Journal of Surgery (London, England), 88, 105918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarshis, S., & Baird, S. L. (2021). Applying intersectionality in clinical supervision: A scoping review. The Clinical Supervisor, 40(2), 218–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2021.1919949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. (2020). Reflective practice in the art and science of counselling: A scoping review. Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia, 8(1) https://doi.org/10.59158/001c.71255
   Google Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., Levac, D., Ng, C., Sharpe, J. P., Wilson, K., Kenny, M., Warren, R., Wilson, C., Stelfox, H. T., & Straus, S. E. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., Zarin, W., Ghassemi, M., Nincic, V., Lillie, E., Page, M. J., Shamseer, L., Antony, J., Rios, P., Hwee, J., Veroniki, A. A., Moher, D., Hartling, L., Pham, B., & Straus, S. E. (2018). Same family, different species: Methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 96, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittemore, R., Chao, A., Jang, M., Minges, K. E., & Park, C. (2014). Methods for knowledge synthesis: An overview. Heart & Lung, 43(5), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.05.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlin, C. (2014). Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (pp. 1–10).
   Google Scholar
• Woo, B. F. Y., Tam, W. W. S., Williams, M. Y., Ow Yong, J. Q. Y., Cheong, Z. Y., Ong, Y. C., Poon, S. N., & Goh, Y. S. (2023). Characteristics, methodological, and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Scholarship: An Official Publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 55(4), 874–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar