2,190
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research paper

Phylogenetic and codon usage analysis of atypical porcine pestivirus (APPV)

, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 916-926 | Received 03 May 2020, Accepted 25 Jun 2020, Published online: 29 Jul 2020

References

  • Hause BM, Collin EA, Peddireddi L, et al. Discovery of a novel putative atypical porcine pestivirus in pigs in the USA. J Gen Virol. 2015;96:2994–2998.
  • King AM, Lefkowitz EJ, Mushegian AR, et al. Changes to taxonomy and the international code of virus classification and nomenclature ratified by the international committee on taxonomy of viruses (2018). Arch Virol. 2018;163:2601–2631.
  • Pan S, Mou C, Chen Z. An emerging novel virus: atypical porcine pestivirus (APPV). Rev Med Virol. 2019;29:e2018.
  • Beer M, Wernike K, Dräger C, et al. High prevalence of highly variable atypical porcine pestiviruses found in Germany. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64:e22–6.
  • Cagatay G, Antos A, Meyer D, et al. Frequent infection of wild boar with atypical porcine pestivirus (APPV). Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65:1087–1093.
  • Postel A, Hansmann F, Baechlein C, et al. Presence of atypical porcine pestivirus (APPV) genomes in newborn piglets correlates with congenital tremor. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–9.
  • Ikemura T. Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. J Mol Biol. 1981;146:1–21.
  • Sueoka N. Directional mutation pressure and neutral molecular evolution. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1988;85:2653–2657.
  • Hu J, Zhao X, Zhang Z, et al. Compositional dynamics of guanine and cytosine content in prokaryotic genomes. Res Microbiol. 2007;158:363–370.
  • Santos MA, Moura G, Massey SE, et al. Driving change: the evolution of alternative genetic codes. Trends Genet. 2004;20:95–102.
  • Burns CC, Shaw J, Campagnoli R, et al. Modulation of poliovirus replicative fitness in HeLa cells by deoptimization of synonymous codon usage in the capsid region. J Virol. 2006;80:3259–3272.
  • Lauring AS, Acevedo A, Cooper SB, et al. Codon usage determines the mutational robustness, evolutionary capacity, and virulence of an RNA virus. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12:623–632.
  • Mueller S, Papamichail D, Coleman JR, et al. Reduction of the rate of poliovirus protein synthesis through large-scale codon deoptimization causes attenuation of viral virulence by lowering specific infectivity. J Virol. 2006;80:9687–9696.
  • Wang M, Zhang J, Zhou J, et al. Analysis of codon usage in bovine viral diarrhea virus. Arch Virol. 2011;156:153–160.
  • Xu X, Fei D, Han H, et al. Comparative characterization analysis of synonymous codon usage bias in classical swine fever virus. Microb Pathog. 2017;107:368–371.
  • Zhou J, Gao Z, Zhang J, et al. Comparative the codon usage between the three main viruses in pestivirus genus and their natural susceptible livestock. Virus Genes. 2012;44:475–481.
  • Ma M-R, Hui L, Wang M-L, et al. Analysis of codon contribution between the pestivirus genus and their natural hosts. J Anim Vet Adv. 2012;11:3999–4004.
  • Schweizer M, Peterhans E. Pestiviruses. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2014;2:141–163.
  • Martin DP, Murrell B, Golden M, et al. RDP4: detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes. Virus Evol. 2015;1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/vev003
  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, et al. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9:772.
  • Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313.
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61:539–542.
  • Deng W, Maust BS, Nickle DC, et al. DIVEIN: a web server to analyze phylogenies, sequence divergence, diversity, and informative sites. Biotechniques. 2010;48:405–408.
  • Charif D, Lobry JR SeqinR 1.0-2: a contributed package to the R project for statistical computing devoted to biological sequences retrieval and analysis. In: Bastolla U, Porto M, Roman HE, Vendruscolo M, eds. Structural approaches to sequence evolution: molecules, networks, populations. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 2007; p. 207–232.
  • Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2013.
  • Sharp PM, Li W-H. An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol. 1986;24:28–38.
  • Sharp PM, Tuohy TM, Mosurski KR. Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986;14:5125–5143.
  • Wong EH, Smith DK, Rabadan R, et al. Codon usage bias and the evolution of influenza A viruses. Codon usage biases of influenza virus. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:253.
  • Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. Principal component analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 1987;2:37–52.
  • Kassambara A, Mundt F. Factoextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. R Package Version. 2017;1:2017.
  • Kariin S, Burge C. Dinucleotide relative abundance extremes: a genomic signature. Trends Genet. 1995;11:283–290.
  • Karlin S, Mrázek J. Compositional differences within and between eukaryotic genomes. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1997;94:10227–10232.
  • Wright F. The ‘effective number of codons’ used in a gene. Gene. 1990;87:23–29.
  • Fuglsang A. The ‘effective number of codons’ revisited. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;317:957–964.
  • Elek A, Kuzman M, Vlahoviček K. coRdon: codon usage analysis and prediction of gene expressivity. 2018.
  • Sharp PM, Li W-H. The codon adaptation index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15:1281–1295.
  • Puigbò P, Bravo IG, Garcia-Vallve S. CAIcal: a combined set of tools to assess codon usage adaptation. Biol Direct. 2008;3:38.
  • Athey J, Alexaki A, Osipova E, et al. A new and updated resource for codon usage tables. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18:391.
  • Butt AM, Nasrullah I, Qamar R, et al. Evolution of codon usage in Zika virus genomes is host and vector specific. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2016;5:1–14.
  • Khandia R, Singhal S, Kumar U, et al. Analysis of Nipah virus codon usage and adaptation to hosts. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:886.
  • Zhou J, Zhang J, Sun D, et al. The distribution of synonymous codon choice in the translation initiation region of dengue virus. PloS One. 2013;8(10):e77239.
  • Dinno A dunn.test: dunn’s test of multiple comparisons using rank sums. R package version. 2017; p. 1.
  • Jenkins GM, Holmes EC. The extent of codon usage bias in human RNA viruses and its evolutionary origin. Virus Res. 2003;92:1–7.
  • Tao P, Dai L, Luo M, et al. Analysis of synonymous codon usage in classical swine fever virus. Virus Genes. 2009;38:104–112.
  • Karlin S, Doerfler W, Cardon L. Why is CpG suppressed in the genomes of virtually all small eukaryotic viruses but not in those of large eukaryotic viruses? J Virol. 1994;68:2889–2897.
  • Schwarz L, Riedel C, Högler S, et al. Congenital infection with atypical porcine pestivirus (APPV) is associated with disease and viral persistence. Vet Res. 2017;48:1.