RIOK3-Mediated Akt phosphorylation facilitates synergistic replication of Marek’s disease and reticuloendotheliosis viruses

References

• Davidson I. Out of sight, but not out of mind: aspects of the avian oncogenic herpesvirus, Marek’s disease virus. Animals (Basel). 2020;10(8):1319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Payne LN, Venugopal K. Neoplastic diseases: Marek’s disease, avian leukosis and reticuloendotheliosis. Rev Sci Tech. 2000;19(2):544–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson I, Borovskaya A, Perl S, et al. Use of the polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of natural infection of chickens and turkeys with Marek’s disease virus and reticuloendotheliosis virus. Avian Pathol. 1995;24(1):69–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi M, Ishikawa K, Nagai H, et al. Detection of contamination of vaccines with the reticuloendotheliosis virus by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Virus Res. 1996;40:113–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimann I, Werner O. Use of the polymerase chain reaction for the detection of reticuloendotheliosis virus in Marek’s disease vaccines and chicken tissues. Zentralbl Veterinarmed. 1996;B43:75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Gopal S, Manoharan P, Kathaperumal K, et al. Differential detection of avian oncogenic viruses in poultry layer farms and Turkeys by use of multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(8):2668–2673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao W, Mays J, Dunn J, et al. Use of polymerase chain reaction in detection of Marek’s disease and reticuloendotheliosis viruses in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumorous tissues. Avian Dis. 2013;57(4):785–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buscaglia C. Mixed infections of Marek’s disease and reticuloendotheliosis viruses in layer flocks in Argentina. Avian Dis. 2013;57(2s1):569–571.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang LC, Huang D, Pu CE, et al. Avian oncogenic virus differential diagnosis in chickens using oligonucleotide microarray. J Virol Methods. 2014;210(210):45–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Song H, Bae Y, Park S, et al. Loop-Mediated isothermal amplification assay for detection of four immunosuppressive viruses in chicken. J Virol Methods. 2018;256:6–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed H, Mays J, Kiupel M, et al. Development of reliable techniques for the differential diagnosis of avian tumour viruses by immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Avian Pathol. 2018;47(4):364–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong F, Zhu Y, Wang J, et al. A multiplex xTAG assay for the simultaneous detection of five chicken immunosuppressive viruses. BMC Vet Res. 2018;14(1):347.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chacón RD, Astolfi-Ferreira CS, Guimarães MB, et al. Detection and molecular characterization of a natural coinfection of Marek’s disease virus and reticuloendotheliosis virus in Brazilian backyard chicken flock. Vet Sci. 2019;6(4):92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kannaki TR, Edigi P, Yalagandula N, et al. Simultaneous detection and differentiation of three oncogenic viral diseases of chicken by use of multiplex PCR. Anim Biotechnol. 2021;30:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Li M, Wang P, Li Q, et al. Reemergence of reticuloendotheliosis virus and Marek’s disease virus co-infection in yellow-chickens in Southern China. Poult Sci. 2021;100(8):101099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isfort R, Jones D, Kost R, et al. Retrovirus insertion into herpesvirus in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci US. 1992;A89(3):991–995.
   Google Scholar
• Kost R, Jones D, Isfort R, et al. Retrovirus insertion into herpesvirus: characterization of a Marek’s disease virus harboring a solo LTR. Virology. 1993;192(1):161–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones D, Isfort R, Witter R, et al. Retroviral insertions into a herpesvirus are clustered at the junctions of the short repeat and short unique sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci US. 1993;A90(9):3855–3859.
   Google Scholar
• Witter RL, Li D, Jones D, et al. Retroviral insertional mutagenesis of a herpesvirus: a Marek’s disease virus mutant attenuated for oncogenicity but not for immunosuppression or in vivo replication. Avian Dis. 1997;41(2):407–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun AJ, Xu XY, Petherbridge L, et al. Functional evaluation of the role of reticuloendotheliosis virus long terminal repeat (LTR) integrated into the genome of a field strain of Marek’s disease virus. Virology. 2010;397(2):270–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Z, Zhuang G, Xu X, et al. Molecular and biological characterization of a Marek’s disease virus field strain with reticuloendotheliosis virus LTR insert. Virus Genes. 2010;40(2):236–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YP, Bao KY, Sun GR, et al. Characterization of a Gallid herpesvirus 2 strain with novel reticuloendotheliosis virus long terminal repeat inserts. Virus Genes. 2017;53(3):386–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui N, Li X, Chen C, et al. Transcriptional and bioinformatic analysis provide a relationship between host response changes to Marek’s disease viruses infection and an integrated long terminal repeat. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016;6:46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su S, Cui N, Cui Z, et al. Complete genome sequence of a recombinant Marek’s disease virus field strain with one reticuloendotheliosis virus long terminal repeat insert. J Virol. 2012;86(24):13818–13819.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lupiani B, Lee LF, Kreager KS, et al. Insertion of reticuloendotheliosis virus long terminal repeat into the genome of CVI988 strain of Marek’s disease virus results in enhanced growth and protection. Avian Dis. 2013;57(2s1):427–431.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aly MM, Witter RL, Fadly AM. Enhancement of reticuloendotheliosis virus-induced bursal lymphomas by serotype 2 Marek’s disease virus. Avian Pathol. 1996;25(1):81–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yu Z, Lan X, et al. A high frequency of Gallid herpesvirus-2 co-infection with Reticuloendotheliosis virus is associated with high tumor rates in Chinese chicken farms. Vet Microbiol. 2019;237:108418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Ma K, Liu M, et al. Histologic findings and viral antigen distribution in natural coinfection of layer hens with subgroup J avian leukosis virus, Marek’s disease virus, and reticuloendotheliosis virus. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2019;31(5):761–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su S, Cui N, Li Y, et al. Increased horizontal transmission of recombinant Marek’s disease virus due to reticuloendotheliosis virus long terminal repeat is the major competitive advantage of the virus being a prevalent strain. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng YS, Cui ZZ, Zhao P, et al. Effects of reticuloendotheliosis virus and Marek’s disease virus infection and co-infection on IFN-gamma production in SPF chickens. J Vet Med Sci. 2007;69(2):213–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun GR, Zhang YP, Zhou LY, et al. Co-Infection with Marek’s disease virus and reticuloendotheliosis virus increases illness severity and reduces Marek’s disease vaccine efficacy. Viruses. 2017;9(6):158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Dong X, Yang C, et al. Isolation, identification, and whole genome sequencing of reticuloendotheliosis virus from a vaccine against Marek’s disease. Poult Sci. 2015;94(4):643–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao KY, Zhang YP, Zheng HW, et al. Isolation and full-genome sequence of two reticuloendotheliosis virus strains from mixed infections with Marek’s disease virus in China. Virus Genes. 2015;50(3):418–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woźniakowski G, Mamczur A, Samorek-Salamonowicz E. Common occurrence of Gallid herpesvirus-2 with reticuloendotheliosis virus in chickens caused by possible contamination of vaccine stocks. J Appl Microbiol. 2015;118(4):803–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi M, Li M, Wang P, et al. An outbreak in three-yellow chickens with clinical tumors of high mortality caused by the coinfection of reticuloendotheliosis virus and Marek’s disease virus: a speculated reticuloendotheliosis virus contamination plays an important role in the case. Poult Sci. 2021;100(1):19–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooray S. The pivotal role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase–akt signal transduction in virus survival. J Gen Virol. 2004;85(5):1065–1076.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chugh P, Bradel-Tretheway B, Monteiro-Filho CM, et al. Akt inhibitors as an HIV-1 infected macrophage-specific anti-viral therapy. Retrovirology. 2008;5(1):11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu X, Guo Y, Yao S, et al. Synergy between Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) vIL-6 and HIV-1 nef protein in promotion of angiogenesis and oncogenesis: role of the AKT signaling pathway. Oncogene. 2014;33(15):1986–1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning BD, Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007;129(7):1261–1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn EF, Connor JH. HijAkt: the PI3K/Akt pathway in virus replication and pathogenesis. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2012;106:223–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua H, Kong Q, Zhang H, et al. Targeting mTOR for cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl N, Schaal H. Make yourself at home: viral hijacking of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Viruses. 2013;5(12):3192–3212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchkovich NJ, Yu Y, Zampieri CA, et al. The TORrid affairs of viruses: effects of mammalian DNA viruses on the PI3K–Akt–mTOR signalling pathway. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6(4):266–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn EF, Connor JH. Dominant inhibition of Akt/protein kinase B signaling by the matrix protein of a negative-strand RNA virus. J Virol. 2011;85(1):422–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panas MD, Varjak M, Lulla A, et al. Sequestration of G3BP coupled with efficient translation inhibits stress granules in Semliki forest virus infection. Mol Biol Cell. 2012;23(24):4701–4712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton DC, Rouhi P, Zois CE, et al. Hypoxic regulation of RIOK3 is a major mechanism for cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Oncogene. 2015;34(36):4713–4722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Ji D, Wang P, et al. The atypical protein kinase RIOK3 contributes to glioma cell proliferation/survival, migration/invasion and the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Cancer Lett. 2018;415:151–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Tang K, Chen D, et al. Riok3 inhibits the antiviral immune response by facilitating TRIM40-mediated RIG-I and MDA5 degradation. Cell Rep. 2021;35(12):109272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumas K, Soudet J, Caizergues-Ferrer M, et al. Human RioK3 is a novel component of cytoplasmic pre-40S pre-ribosomal particles. RNA Biol. 2012;9(2):162–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhu J, He M, et al. Marek’s disease virus activates the pi3k/akt pathway through interaction of its protein meq with the p85 subunit of pi3k to promote viral replication. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du X, Zhou D, Zhou J, et al. Marek’s disease virus and reticuloendotheliosis virus coinfection enhances viral replication and alters cellular protein profiles. front vet sci. 2022;9:854007. DOI:10.3389/fvets.2022.854007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrhardt C, Marjuki H, Wolff T, et al. Bivalent role of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) during influenza virus infection and host cell defence. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8(8):1336–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedersha N, Ivanov P, Anderson P. Stress granules and cell signaling: more than just a passing phase? Trends Biochem Sci. 2013;38(10):494–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pati S, Foulke JS Jr, Barabitskaya O, et al. Human herpesvirus 8-encoded vGPCR activates nuclear factor of activated T cells and collaborates with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tat. J Virol. 2003;77(10):5759–5773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou F, Xue M, Qin D, et al. HIV-1 tat promotes Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus (KSHV) vIL-6-induced angiogenesis and tumorigenesis by regulating PI3K/PTEN/AKT/GSK-3β signaling pathway. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Cheng L, Jia X, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tat accelerates kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus kaposin A-mediated tumorigenesis of transformed fibroblasts in vitro as well as in nude and immunocompetent mice. Neoplasia. 2009;11(12):1272–1284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorchakov R, Frolova E, Williams BR, et al. PKR-Dependent and -independent mechanisms are involved in translational shutoff during Sindbis virus infection. J Virol. 2004;78(16):8455–8467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spuul P, Salonen A, Merits A, et al. Role of the amphipathic peptide of Semliki forest virus replicase protein nsP1 in membrane association and virus replication. J Virol. 2017;81(2):872–883.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner MJ, Smiley JR. Herpes simplex virus requires VP11/12 to activate Src family kinasephosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt signaling. J Virol. 2011;85(6):2803–2812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale BG, Jackson D, Chen YH, et al. Influenza a virus NS1 protein binds p85β and activates phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA. 2006;103(38):14194–14199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman NJ, Cristea IM, Terhune SS, et al. Human cytomegalovirus protein UL38 inhibits host cell stress responses by antagonizing the tuberous sclerosis protein complex. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;3(4):253–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRonde-LeBlanc N, Wlodawer A. The RIO kinases: an atypical protein kinase family required for ribosome biogenesis and cell cycle progression. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1754(1–2):14–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan J, Wang P, Zhou J, et al. RIOK3 interacts with caspase-10 and negatively regulates the NF-κb signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biochem. 2009;332(1–2):113–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar