Hijacking host cell vesicular transport: New insights into the nutrient acquisition mechanism of Chlamydia

References

• Grayston JT, Campbell LA, Kuo CC, et al. A new respiratory tract pathogen. Chlamydia pneumoniae strain TWAR J Infect Dis. 1990;161(4):618–14. doi: 10.1093/infdis/161.4.618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor HR, Burton MJ, Haddad D, et al. Trachoma. Lancet. 2014;384(9960):2142–2152. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62182-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakeshott P, Kerry S, Aghaizu A, et al. Randomised controlled trial of screening for chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial. BMJ. 2010;340(apr08 1):c1642–c1642. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1642
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price MJ, Ades AE, Welton NJ, et al. How much tubal factor infertility is caused by Chlamydia? Estimates based on serological evidence corrected for sensitivity and specificity. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39(8):608–613. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182572475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra M, Sood S, Mukherjee A, et al. Genital chlamydia trachomatis: an update. Indian J Med Res. 2013;138(3):303–316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buckner LR, Amedee AM, Albritton HL, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection of endocervical epithelial cells enhances early HIV transmission events. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rother M, Gonzalez E, Teixeira da Costa AR, et al. Combined human genome-wide RNAi and metabolite analyses identify IMPDH as a host- directed target against chlamydia infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23(5):661–671.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwell C, Mirrashidi K, Engel J. Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(6):385–400. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong F, Su H, Huang Y, et al. Cleavage of host keratin 8 by a Chlamydia-secreted protease. Infect Immun. 2004;72(7):3863–3868. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.7.3863-3868.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Chen D, Zhong Y, et al. The chlamydial plasmid-encoded protein pgp3 is secreted into the cytosol of Chlamydia-infected cells. Infect Immun. 2008;76(8):3415–3428. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01377-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasai B, Haber GJ, Strub MP, et al. The nanoscale molecular morphology of docked exocytic dense-core vesicles in neuroendocrine cells. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3970. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24167-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnettger L, Rodgers A, Repnik U, et al. A Rab20- dependent membrane trafficking pathway controls M. tuberculosis replication by regulating phagosome spaciousness and integrity. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21(5):619–628.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsman M, Jordens I, Kuijl C, et al. Dynein-mediated vesicle transport controls intracellular salmonella replication. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15(6):2954–2964. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-08-0614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allgood SC, Romero DueñDueñAs BP, Noll RR, et al. Legionella effector AnkX disrupts host cell endocytic recycling in a phosphocholination-dependent manner. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:397. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutagalung AH, Novick PJ. Role of rab GTPases in membrane traffic and cell physiology. Physiol Rev. 2011;91(1):119–149. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00059.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai A, Goody RS, Müller MP. Multivalency in Rab effector interactions. Small GTPases. 2019;10(1):40–46. doi: 10.1080/21541248.2016.1265700
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephens RS, Kalman S, Lammel C, et al. Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: chlamydia trachomatis. Science. 1998;282(5389):754–759. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5389.754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran NA. Microbial minimalism: genome reduction in bacterial pathogens. Cell. 2002;108(5):583–586. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00665-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee R, Chowdhury AR, Mukherjee D, et al. Lipid larceny: channelizing host lipids for establishing successful pathogenesis by bacteria. Virulence. 2021;12(1):195–216. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1869441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris R, Merling M, Andersen SE, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis CT229 subverts Rab GTPase-dependent CCV trafficking pathways to promote chlamydial infection. Cell Rep. 2019;26(12):3380–3390.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch ND, Ouellette SP, Roy CR. Inhibition of tRNA synthetases induces persistence in Chlamydia. Infect Immun. 2020;88(4):e00943–19. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00943-19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokorzynski ND, Thompson CC, Carabeo RA. Ironing out the unconventional mechanisms of iron acquisition and gene regulation in chlamydia. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:394. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saka HA, Thompson JW, Chen YS, et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals metabolic and pathogenic properties of chlamydia trachomatis developmental forms. Mol Microbiol. 2011;82(5):1185–1203. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07877.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajeeve K, Vollmuth N, Janaki-Raman S, et al. Reprogramming of host glutamine metabolism during chlamydia trachomatis infection and its key role in peptidoglycan synthesis. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(11):1390–1402. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0762-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer A, Rudel T. Subversion of cell-autonomous host defense by Chlamydia infection. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2018;412:81–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastidas RJ, Elwell CA, Engel JN, et al. Chlamydial intracellular survival strategies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013;3(5):a010256. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a010256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive AJ, Haff MG, Emanuele MJ, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis-induced alterations in the host cell proteome are required for intracellular growth. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15(1):113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadora PK, Chumduri C, Imami K, et al. Integrated phosphoproteome and transcriptome analysis reveals Chlamydia-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in Host cells. Cell Rep. 2019;26(5):1286–1302.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen KT, Petersen L, Falk S, et al. Novel overlapping coding sequences in chlamydia trachomatis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;265(1):106–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei L, Yang C, Patton MJ, et al. A chlamydial plasmid-dependent secretion system for the delivery of virulence factors to the host cytosol. MBio. 2021;12(3):e0117921. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01179-21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucks EA. Type III secretion in Chlamydia. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2023;87(3):e0003423. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00034-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts-Hampikian HJ, Fields KA. The chlamydial type III secretion mechanism: revealing cracks in a tough nut. Front Microbiol. 2010;1:114. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2010.00114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong G. Chlamydia trachomatis secretion of proteases for manipulating host signaling pathways. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:14. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegl C, Prusty BK, Karunakaran K, et al. Tumor suppressor p53 alters host cell metabolism to limit chlamydia trachomatis infection. Cell Rep. 2014;9(3):918–929. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nans A, Kudryashev M, Saibil HR, et al. Structure of a bacterial type III secretion system in contact with a host membrane in situ. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):10114. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10114
   Google Scholar
• Faris R, McCullough A, Andersen SE, et al. The chlamydia trachomatis secreted effector TmeA hijacks the N-WASP-ARP2/3 actin remodeling axis to facilitate cellular invasion. PLOS Pathog. 2020;16(9):e1008878. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George Z, Omosun Y, Azenabor AA, et al. The molecular mechanism of induction of unfolded protein response by chlamydia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;508(2):421–429. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.11.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore ER, Ouellette SP. Reconceptualizing the chlamydial inclusion as a pathogen-specified parasitic organelle: an expanded role for Inc proteins. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:157. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier K, Jachmann LH, Türköz G, et al. The chlamydia effector CpoS modulates the inclusion microenvironment and restricts the interferon response by acting on Rab35. MBio. 2023;14(4):e0319022. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03190-22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luís MP, Pereira IS, Bugalhão JN, et al. The chlamydia trachomatis IncM protein interferes with host cell cytokinesis, centrosome positioning, and Golgi distribution and contributes to the stability of the pathogen-containing vacuole. Infect Immun. 2023;91(4):e0040522. doi: 10.1128/iai.00405-22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida F, Luís MP, Pereira IS, et al. The human centrosomal protein CCDC146 binds chlamydia trachomatis inclusion membrane protein CT288 and is recruited to the periphery of the chlamydia-containing vacuole. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:254. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banhart S, Schafer EK, Gensch JM, et al. Sphingolipid metabolism and transport in chlamydia trachomatis and chlamydia psittaci infections. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:223. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang T, Wu H, Chen X, et al. The hypothetical inclusion membrane protein CPSIT_0846 regulates mitochondrial-mediated host cell apoptosis via the ERK/JNK signaling pathway. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:607422. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.607422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty WL. Trafficking from CD63-positive late endocytic multivesicular bodies is essential for intracellular development of chlamydia trachomatis. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(Pt 2):350–359. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty WL. Late endocytic multivesicular bodies intersect the chlamydial inclusion in the absence of CD63. Infect Immun. 2008;76(7):2872–2881. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00129-08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Méndez L, Gradilla AC, Sánchez-Hernández D, et al. Polarized sorting of patched enables cytoneme-mediated hedgehog reception in the drosophila wing disc. Embo J. 2020;39(11):e103629. doi: 10.15252/embj.2019103629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail SA, Vetter IR, Sot B, et al. The structure of an arf-ArfGAP complex reveals a Ca2+ regulatory mechanism. Cell. 2010;141(5):812–821. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Rzomp KA, Tvinnereim A, et al. Chlamydia pneumoniae inclusion membrane protein Cpn0585 interacts with multiple Rab GTPases. Infect Immun. 2007;75(12):5586–5596. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01020-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvola N, Diao A, McKenzie E, et al. Membrane targeting and activation of the Lowe syndrome protein OCRL1 by rab GTPases. Embo J. 2006;25(16):3750–3761. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto H, Koga H, Katoh Y, et al. Functional cross-talk between Rab14 and Rab4 through a dual effector, RUFY1/Rabip4. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21(15):2746–2755. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e10-01-0074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaoui D, Cosse MM, Mohan J, et al. The Chlamydia effector CT622/TaiP targets a nonautophagy related function of ATG16L1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(43):26784–26794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2005389117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rejman Lipinski A, Heymann J, Meissner C, et al. Rab6 and Rab11 regulate Chlamydia trachomatis development and golgin-84-dependent golgi fragmentation. PLOS Pathog. 2009;5(10):e1000615. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorhead AR, Rzomp KA, Scidmore MA. The Rab6 effector bicaudal D1 associates with Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in a biovar-specific manner. Infect Immun. 2007;75(2):781–791. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01447-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiva N, Capmany A, Damiani MT. Rab11-family of interacting protein 2 associates with chlamydial inclusions through its Rab-binding domain and promotes bacterial multiplication. Cell Microbiol. 2013;15(1):114–129. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capmany A, Gambarte Tudela J, Alonso Bivou M, et al. Akt/AS160 signaling pathway inhibition impairs infection by decreasing Rab14-controlled sphingolipids delivery to chlamydial inclusions. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:666. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molleken K, Hegemann JH, Coombes BK. Acquisition of Rab11 and Rab11-Fip2 – A novel strategy for chlamydia pneumoniae early survival. PLOS Pathog. 2017;13(8):e1006556. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambarte Tudela J, Buonfigli J, Lujan A, et al. Rab39a and Rab39b display different intracellular distribution and function in sphingolipids and phospholipids transport. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(7):1688. doi: 10.3390/ijms20071688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesolowski J, Weber MM, Nawrotek A, et al. Chlamydia hijacks ARF GTPases to coordinate microtubule posttranslational modifications and Golgi complex positioning. MBio. 2017;8(3):e02280–16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02280-16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwell CA, Jiang S, Kim JH, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis co-opts GBF1 and CERT to acquire host sphingomyelin for distinct roles during intracellular development. PLOS Pathog. 2011;7(9):e1002198. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DC, Jorgenson LM, Ouellette SP, et al. Eukaryotic SNARE VAMP3 dynamically interacts with multiple chlamydial inclusion membrane proteins. Infect Immun. 2021;89(2):e00409–20. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00409-20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabeiseman EJ, Cichos K, Hackstadt T, et al. Vesicle-associated membrane protein 4 and syntaxin 6 interactions at the chlamydial inclusion. Infect Immun. 2013;81(9):3326–3337. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00584-13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro-Bras T, Wesolowski J, Paumet F. Depletion of SNAP-23 and Syntaxin 4 alters lipid droplet homeostasis during chlamydia infection. Microb Cell. 2019;7(2):46–58. doi: 10.15698/mic2020.02.707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul B, Kim HS, Kerr MC, et al. Structural basis for the hijacking of endosomal sorting nexin proteins by chlamydia trachomatis. Elife. 2017;6:e22311. doi: 10.7554/eLife.22311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwell CA, Czudnochowski N, von Dollen J, et al. Chlamydia interfere with an interaction between the mannose-6-phosphate receptor and sorting nexins to counteract host restriction. Elife. 2017;6:e22709. doi: 10.7554/eLife.22709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derre I, Swiss R, Agaisse H, et al. The lipid transfer protein CERT interacts with the Chlamydia inclusion protein IncD and participates to ER-Chlamydia inclusion membrane contact sites. PLOS Pathog. 2011;7(6):e1002092. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Dong X, Zhao R, et al. The t-SNARE protein FgPep12, associated with FgVam7, is essential for ascospore discharge and plant infection by trafficking Ca2+ ATPase FgNeo1 between Golgi and endosome/vacuole in fusarium graminearum. PLOS Pathog. 2019;15(5):e1007754. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisio H, Chaabene RB, Sabitzki R, et al. The ZIP code of vesicle trafficking in apicomplexa: SEC1/Munc18 and SNARE proteins. MBio. 2020;11(5):e02092–20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02092-20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Gao Y, Mao HY, et al. The SNARE protein FolVam7 mediates intracellular trafficking to regulate conidiogenesis and pathogenicity in Fusarium oxysporum. lycopersici Environ Microbiol. 2019;21(8):2696–2706. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber MM, Noriea NF, Bauler LD, et al. A functional core of IncA is required for chlamydia trachomatis inclusion fusion. J Bacteriol. 2016;198(8):1347–1355. doi: 10.1128/JB.00933-15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cingolani G, McCauley M, Lobley A, et al. Structural basis for the homotypic fusion of chlamydial inclusions by the SNARE-like protein IncA. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2747. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10806-9
   Google Scholar
• Ronzone E, Wesolowski J, Bauler LD, et al. An alpha-helical core encodes the dual functions of the chlamydial protein IncA. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(48):33469–33480. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.592063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanada K. Intracellular trafficking of ceramide by ceramide transfer protein. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2010;86(4):426–437. doi: 10.2183/pjab.86.426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehlitz A, Eylert E, Huber C, et al. Metabolic adaptation of chlamydia trachomatis to mammalian host cells. Mol Microbiol. 2017;103(6):1004–1019. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saka HA, Valdivia RH. Acquisition of nutrients by Chlamydiae: unique challenges of living in an intracellular compartment. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13(1):4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2009.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf K, Hackstadt T. Sphingomyelin trafficking in chlamydia pneumoniae-infected cells. Cell Microbiol. 2001;3(3):145–152. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2001.00098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore ER, Fischer ER, Mead DJ, et al. The chlamydial inclusion preferentially intercepts basolaterally directed sphingomyelin-containing exocytic vacuoles. Traffic. 2008;9(12):2130–2140. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00828.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer D, Rejman Lipinski A, Machuy N, et al. Chlamydia causes fragmentation of the golgi compartment to ensure reproduction. Nature. 2009;457(7230):731–735. doi: 10.1038/nature07578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carabeo RA, Mead DJ, Hackstadt T. Golgi-dependent transport of cholesterol to the chlamydia trachomatis inclusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(11):6771–6776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1131289100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackstadt T, Rockey DD, Heinzen RA, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis interrupts an exocytic pathway to acquire endogenously synthesized sphingomyelin in transit from the golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane. Embo J. 1996;15(5):964–977. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00433.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore ER, Mead DJ, Dooley CA, et al. The trans-Golgi SNARE syntaxin 6 is recruited to the chlamydial inclusion membrane. Microbiology (Reading). 2011;157(Pt 3):830–838. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.045856-0
   Google Scholar
• Lucas AL, Ouellette SP, Kabeiseman EJ, et al. The trans-Golgi SNARE syntaxin 10 is required for optimal development of chlamydia trachomatis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015;5:68. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumm S, Singh MK, Nielsen ME, et al. Coordinated activation of ARF1 GTPases by ARF-GEF GNOM dimers is essential for vesicle trafficking in arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2020;32(8):2491–2507. doi: 10.1105/tpc.20.00240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue S, Zou J, Liu Y, et al. Involvement of BIG5 and BIG3 in BRI1 trafficking reveals diverse functions of BIG-subfamily ARF-GEFs in plant growth and gravitropism. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(9):2339. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher S, Kuna D, Caspary T, et al. ARF family GTPases with links to cilia. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2020;319(2):C404–C418. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00188.2020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumoux M, Menny A, Delacour D, et al. A chlamydia effector recruits CEP170 to reprogram host microtubule organization. J Cell Sci. 2015;128(18):3420–3434. doi: 10.1242/jcs.169318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokes M, Dunn JD, Granek JA, et al. Integrating chemical mutagenesis and whole-genome sequencing as a platform for forward and reverse genetic analysis of chlamydia. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(5):716–725. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines A, Wesolowski J, Ryan NM, et al. Cross talk between ARF1 and RhoA coordinates the formation of cytoskeletal scaffolds during chlamydia infection. MBio. 2021;12(6):e0239721. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02397-21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Marlin MC. Rab family of GTPases. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1298:1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stenmark H. Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(8):513–525. doi: 10.1038/nrm2728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer SR, Kellogg D. Rab GTPases: master regulators that establish the secretory and endocytic pathways. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28(6):712–715. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e16-10-0737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambarte Tudela J, Capmany A, Romao M, et al. The late endocytic Rab39a GTPase regulates the interaction between multivesicular bodies and chlamydial inclusions. J Cell Sci. 2015;128(16):3068–3081. doi: 10.1242/jcs.170092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capmany A, Damiani MT, Valdivia RH. Chlamydia trachomatis intercepts Golgi-derived sphingolipids through a Rab14-mediated transport required for bacterial development and replication. PLoS One. 2010;5(11):e14084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rzomp KA, Scholtes LD, Briggs BJ, et al. Rab GTPases are recruited to chlamydial inclusions in both a species-dependent and species-independent manner. Infect Immun. 2003;71(10):5855–5870. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.10.5855-5870.2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokorzynski ND, Brinkworth AJ, Carabeo R. A bipartite iron-dependent transcriptional regulation of the tryptophan salvage pathway in chlamydia trachomatis. Elife. 2019;8:e42295. doi: 10.7554/eLife.42295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette SP, Carabeo RA. A functional slow recycling pathway of transferrin is required for growth of chlamydia. Front Microbiol. 2010;1:112. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2010.00112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boada-Romero E, Letek M, Fleischer A, et al. TMEM59 defines a novel ATG16L1-binding motif that promotes local activation of LC3. Embo J. 2013;32(4):566–582. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Q, Zheng X, Zhang L, et al. The neuron-specific protein TMEM59L mediates oxidative stress-induced cell death. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54(6):4189–4200. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-9997-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonifacino JS, Hurley JH. Retromer. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20(4):427–436. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Shah SZ, Zhao D, et al. Role of the retromer complex in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:42. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Progida C, Bakke O. Bidirectional traffic between the Golgi and the endosomes – machineries and regulation. J Cell Sci. 2016;129(21):3971–3982. doi: 10.1242/jcs.185702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirrashidi KM, Elwell CA, Verschueren E, et al. Global mapping of the Inc-human interactome reveals that retromer restricts Chlamydia infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;18(1):109–121. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Q, Yong X, Sun X, et al. Structural and functional insights into sorting nexin 5/6 interaction with bacterial effector IncE. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2017;2(1):17030. doi: 10.1038/sigtrans.2017.30
   Google Scholar
• Capmany A, Leiva N, Damiani MT. Golgi-associated Rab14, a new regulator for chlamydia trachomatis infection outcome. Commun Integr Biol. 2011;4(5):590–593. doi: 10.4161/cib.16594
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pruneda JN, Bastidas RJ, Bertsoulaki E, et al. A Chlamydia effector combining deubiquitination and acetylation activities induces golgi fragmentation. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3(12):1377–1384. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0271-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campanacci V, Urvoas A, Cantos-Fernandes S, et al. Insight into microtubule nucleation from tubulin-capping proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(20):9859–9864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813559116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miinea CP, Sano H, Kane S, et al. AS160, the Akt substrate regulating GLUT4 translocation, has a functional rab GTPase-activating protein domain. Biochem J. 2005;391(Pt 1):87–93. doi: 10.1042/BJ20050887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang X, Tan J, Chen X, et al. Akt phosphorylation influences persistent chlamydial infection and Chlamydia-induced Golgi fragmentation without involving Rab14. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:675890. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.675890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar