66
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

Ethical Analyses of Predictive Brain Implants Should Be Consistent With Feminist Interpretations of Autonomy

&

REFERENCES

  • Baylis, F. 2013. ‘I am who I am': On the perceived threats to personal identity from deep brain stimulation. Neuroethics 6: 513–26.
  • Christman, J. 2015. Autonomy in moral and political philosophy. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/autonomy-moral
  • Gilbert, F. 2015. A threat to autonomy? The intrusion of predictive brain implants. AJOB Neuroscience 6(4): 4–11.
  • Glannon, W. 2009. Stimulating brains, altering minds. Journal of Medical Ethics 35: 289–92.
  • Johansson, V, M. Garwicz, M. Kanje, J. Schouenborg, A. Tingström, and U. Görman. 2011. Authenticity, depression, and deep brain stimulation. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 5: 21. doi:10.3389/fnint.2011.00021
  • Mackenzie, C. 2008. Relational autonomy, normative authority and perfectionism. Journal of Social Philosophy 39(4): 512–33.
  • Wardrope, A. 2015. Authenticity and autonomy in deep-brain stimulation. Journal of Medical Ethics 40: 563–66.
  • Young, R. 1986. Personal autonomy: Beyond negative and positive liberty. International series of social and political thought. London, UK: Croom Helm.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.