REFERENCES
- Baylis, F. 2013. “I am who I am”: On the perceived threats to personal identity from deep brain stimulation. Neuroethics 6(3):513–26. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9137-1
- Bublitz, J. C., and R. Merkel. 2012. Crimes against minds: On mental manipulations, harms and a human right to mental self-determination. Criminal Law and Philosophy 8(1):51–77. doi:10.1007/s11572-012-9172-y
- Gilbert, F. 2015. A threat to autonomy? The intrusion of predictive brain implants. AJOB Neuroscience 6(4):4–11. doi:10.1080/21507740.2015.1076087
- Goddard, E. 2017. Deep brain stimulation through the “lens of agency”: Clarifying threats to personal identity from neurological intervention. Neuroethics 1–11. doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9297-0
- Goering, S., E. Klein, D. Dougherty, and A. Widge. 2017. Staying in the loop: Relational agency and identity in next-generation DBS for psychiatry. AJOB Neuroscience 8(2):59–70.
- Klein, E., S. Goering, J. Gagne, et al. 2016. Brain-computer interface-based control of closed-loop brain stimulation: Attitudes and ethical considerations. Brain-Computer Interfaces 3(3): 140–48. doi:10.1080/2326263X.2016.1207497
- Kraemer, F. 2013. Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma. Journal of Medical Ethics 39(12):757–60.
- Maslen, H., J. Pugh, and J. Savulescu. 2015. The ethics of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of anorexia nervosa. Neuroethics 8(3):215–30. doi:10.1007/s12152-015-9240-9.
- Nyholm, S., and E. O'Neill. 2016. Deep brain stimulation, continuity over time, and the true self. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (November):647–58. doi:10.1017/S0963180116000372