REFERENCES
- Hansson, S. O. 2004. Fallacies of risk. Journal of Risk Research 7(3): 353–360. doi: 10.1080/1366987042000176262.
- Haselager, P., and G. Mecacci. 2017. Is brain reading mind reading? In Neurolaw: Crimes, concepts, courts, ed. B. Donnelly-Lazarov, D. Patterson, and P. Raynor, In Press. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Haynes, J.-D. 2012. Brain reading: Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. In Oxford hadbook of neuroethics, ed. J. Illes and B. J. Sahakian, 1–8. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Huth, A. G., W. A. de Heer, T. L. Griffiths, F. E. Theunissen, and J. L. Gallant. 2016. Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature 532(7600): 453–458. doi: 10.1038/nature17637.
- Ienca, M., P. Haselager, and E. J. Emanuel. 2018. Brain leaks and consumer neurotechnology. Nature Biotechnology 36(9): 805. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4240.
- Mecacci, G., and P. Haselager. 2017. Identifying criteria for the evaluation of the implications of brain reading for mental privacy. Science and Engineering Ethics 25(2):443–61. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0003-3.
- Meynen, G. 2019. Ethical issues to consider before introducing neurotechnological thought apprehension in psychiatry. AJOB Neuroscience XX(XX): XX–XX.
- Ponseti, J. 2012. Assessment of pedophilia using hemodynamic brain response to sexual stimuli. Archives of General Psychiatry 69(2): 187. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.130.