396
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

Privacy Concerns in Brain–Computer Interfaces

Pages 30-32 | Received 21 Jan 2019, Accepted 25 Feb 2019, Published online: 09 May 2019

REFERENCES

  • Bublitz, C. 2015. Cognitive liberty or the international human right to freedom of thought. Handbook of Neuroethics 1309–1333.
  • Bublitz, C., A. Wolkenstein, R. R. Jox, and O. Friedrich. 2018. Legal liabilities of BCI-users: Responsibility gaps at the intersection of mind and machine? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.10.002.
  • Farahany, N. A. 2012. Incriminating thoughts. Stanford Law Review 64: 351.
  • Meynen, G. 2019. Ethical issues to consider before introducing neurotechnological thought apprehension in psychiatry. AJOB XX(XX): XX–XX.
  • Poldrack, R. A. 2006. Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(2): 59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004.
  • Steinert, S., C. Bublitz, R. Jox, and O. Friedrich. 2018. Doing things with thoughts: Brain-computer interfaces and disembodied agency. Philosophy & Technology 1–26. doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0308-4

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.