REFERENCES
- Karas, P. J. S., J. Lee, W. Jimenez-Shahed, K. Goodman, A. Viswanathan, and S. A. Sheth. 2019. Deep brain stimulation for obsessive compulsive disorder: Evolution of surgical stimulation target parallels changing model of dysfunctional brain circuits. Frontiers in Neuroscience 12:998. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00998.
- Mason, R. A., and M. A. Just. 2016. Neural representations of physics concepts. Psychological Science 27 (6):904–913. doi: 10.1177/0956797616641941.
- Meynen, G. 2019. Ethical issues to consider before introducing neurotechnological thought apprehension in psychiatry. AJOB Neuroscience XX (XX): XX–XX.
- Rissman, J., H. T. Greely, and A. D. Wagner. 2010. Detecting individual memories through the neural decoding of memory states and past experiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (21):9849–9854. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001028107.
- Roskies, A. L. 2015. Mind reading, lie detection, and privacy. In Handbook of neuroethics. vol. 2, ed. J. Clausen and N. Levy, 679–695. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_123.
- Shen, F. X. 2013. Neuroscience, mental privacy, and the law. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 36 (2):653–713. http://www.harvard-jlpp.com/vols-35-39.
- Taruschio, A. M. 2000. The First Amendment, the right not to speak, and the problem of government access statutes. Fordham Urban Law Journal 27 (3):1001–51. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol27/iss3/10.
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 1943.
- Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705 1977.