REFERENCES
- Aristotle. 350 BCE/1998. Nichomachean ethics, (ranslated by D.P. Chase). Mineola, NY: Dover.
- Brunoni, A. R., M. A. Nitsche, N. Bolognini, et al. 2012. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions. Brain Stimulation 5(3): 175–195. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002.
- Davis, N. J. 2014. Transcranial stimulation of the developing brain: Plea for extreme caution. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 600. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00600.
- Dubljević, V. 2015. Neurostimulation devices for cognitive enhancement: Toward a comprehensive regulatory framework. Neuroethics 8(2): 115–126. doi:10.1007/s12152-014-9225-0.
- Dubljević, V. 2019. Neuroethics, justice and autonomy: Public reason in the cognitive enhancement debate. Heidelberg: Springer.
- Dubljević, V., I. Coates McCall, and J. Illes. 2019. Neuroenhancement at work: Addressing the ethical, legal and social implications. In Organizational neuroethics, ed. J. Trempe-Martineau and E. Racine. Heidelberg: Springer, In Press.
- Dubljević, V., V. Saigle, and E. Racine. 2014. The rising tide of tDCS in the media and academic literature. Neuron 82(4): 731–736. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.003.
- Kreitmair, K. 2019. Dimensions of ethical direct-to-consumer neurotechnologies. AJOB Neuroscience 10(4): 152–166.
- Scheper, A., and V. Dubljević. 2018. The public impact of academic and print media portrayals of TMS. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the International Neuroethics Society, San Diego.
- Steenbergen, L., R. Sellaro, B. Hommel, U. Lindenberger, S. Kühn, and L. S. Colzato. 2015. Unfocus” on foc.us: Commercial tDCS headset impairs working memory. Experimental Brain Research 234(3): 637–643. doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4391-9.
- Voarino, N., V. Dubljević, and E. Racine. 2017. tDCS for memory enhancement: A critical analysis of the speculative aspects of ethical issues. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10: 678. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00678.