REFERENCES
- boyd, d., and E. Hargittai. 2010. Facebook privacy settings: Who cares?’ First Monday 15(8). doi: 10.5210/fm.v15i8.3086.
- Crawford, K. 2013. The hidden biases in big data. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2013/04/the-hidden-biases-in-big-data.
- European Commission. 2018. The GDPR: New opportunities, new obligations. Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/data-protection-factsheet-sme-obligations_en.pdf.
- Kellmeyer, P. 2018. ‘Big Brain Data: On the Responsible Use of Brain Data from Clinical and Consumer-Directed Neurotechnological Devices’. Neuroethics, May. doi: 10.1007/s12152-018-9371-x.
- Kohnstamm, J. 2011. ‘Advice Paper on Special Categories of Data (“Sensitive Data”)’. Brussels: Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/other-document/files/2011/2011_04_20_letter_artwp_mme_le_bail_directive_9546ec_annex1_en.pdf.
- Kreitmair, K. 2019. Dimensions of ethical direct-to-consumer neurotechnologies. The American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience 10(4): 152–166.
- Lotte, F., L. Bougrain, A. Cichocki, et al. 2018. A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–Computer interfaces: A 10 year update. Journal of Neural Engineering 15(3): 031005. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aab2f2.
- Mittelstadt, B. D., and L. Floridi. 2016. The ethics of big data: Current and foreseeable issues in biomedical contexts. Science and Engineering Ethics 22(2): 303–341. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9652-2.
- Zimmer, M. 2010. But the data is already public: On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology 12(4): 313–325. doi: 10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5.