66
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

Virtues-Based Policies for Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement

REFERENCES

  • Bossaer, J. , J. A. Gray , S. E. Miller , V. C. Gaddipati , G. G. Enck , and R. E. Enck . 2013. The use (and misuse) of ‘Cognitive Enhancers’ by students at an Academic Health Sciences Center. Academic Medicine 88 (7):967–971. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294fc7b.
  • Dinh, C. T. , S. Humphries , and A. Chatterjee . 2020. Public opinion on cognitive enhancement varies across different situations. AJOB Neuroscience. 11 (4):224–237.
  • Earp, B. D. , and J. Savulescu. Love Drugs: The Chemical Future of Relationships . Stanford: Stanford Press; 2020.
  • Enck, G. 2013a. Ideals of student excellence and enhancement. Neuroethics 6 (1):155–164. doi: 10.1007/s12152-012-9164-6.
  • Enck, G. 2013b. An error theory of biotechnology & the ethics of chemical breakups: It is the reasons, not the pharmaceuticals, which are important in defending against perilous love. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):32–34.
  • Enck, G. 2013c. Pharmaceutical enhancing medical professionals for difficult conversations. Journal of Evolution and Technology 23 (1):45–55.
  • Enck, G. 2014. Pharmaceutical enhancement and medical professionals. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 17 (1):23–28. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9507-z.
  • Enck, G. 2015. Moving beyond concerns of autonomy. AJOB Neuroscience 6 (4):26–28. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2015.1094543.
  • Enck, G. G. , and J. Ford . 2015. “A responsibility to chemically help patients with relationships and love?” with Jeanna Ford. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (4):493–496. doi: 10.1017/S096318011500016X.
  • McCabe, D. L. , Butterfield, K. D. , and L. K. Trevino . 2003. Faculty and academic integrity: The influence of current honor codes and past honor code experiences. Research in Higher Education 44 (3):367–385. doi: 10.1023/A:1023033916853.
  • Oakley, J. , and D. Cocking . 2001. Virtue ethics and professional roles . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zagzebski, L. 1999. What is knowledge? In The Blackwell guide to epistemology , ed. John Greco and Ernest Sosa , 92–116. Oxford: Blackwell.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.