A Qualitative Analysis of Ethical Perspectives on Recruitment and Consent for Human Intracranial Electrophysiology Studies

REFERENCES

• Abbott, L., and C. Grady. 2011. A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learn. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: JERHRE 6 (1):3–19. doi:10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahalt, C., R. Sudore, M. Bolano, L. Metzger, A. M. Darby, and B. Williams. 2017. “Teach-to-Goal” to better assess informed consent comprehension among incarcerated clinical research participants. AMA Journal of Ethics 19 (9):862–72. doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.9.peer3-1709.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amadio, J., G. Q. Bi, P. F. Boshears, A. Carter, A. Devor, K. Doya, H. Garden, J. Illes, L. S. M. Johnson, L. Jorgenson, et al. 2018. Neuroethics questions to guide ethical research in the international brain initiatives. Neuron 100 (1):19–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, P. S., L. H. Roth, and C. Lidz. 1982. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 5 (3–4):319–29. doi:10.1016/0160-2527(82)90026-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, E. F. 2015. Towards large-scale, human-based, mesoscopic neurotechnologies. Neuron 86 (1):68–78. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiong, W. 2006. The real problem with equipoise. The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB 6 (4):37–47. doi:10.1080/15265160600755565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiong, W., M. K. Leonard, and E. F. Chang. 2018. Neurosurgical patients as human research subjects: ethical considerations in intracranial electrophysiology research. Neurosurgery 83 (1):29–37. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook, I. A., R. Espinoza, and A. F. Leuchter. 2014. Neuromodulation for depression: invasive and noninvasive (deep brain stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, trigeminal nerve stimulation). Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 25 (1):103–16. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2013.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, M. C., M. Houtlosser, J. M. Wit, D. P. Engberts, D. Bresters, G. J. Kaspers, and E. van Leeuwen. 2011. Ethical issues at the interface of clinical care and research practice in pediatric oncology: a narrative review of parents’ and physicians’ experiences. BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1):18. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-12-18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dickert, N. W., S. D. Halpern, and J. Butler. 2013. Incentivizing recruitment and retention to address enrollment challenges in clinical research. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 6 (3):367–70. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, A. K., C. K. E. Moll, I. Fried, and G. A. Ojemann. 2005. Invasive recordings from the human brain: clinical insights and beyond. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 6 (1):35–47. doi:10.1038/nrn1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, C. 2019. A hybrid approach to obtaining research consent. The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB 19 (4):28–30. doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1574493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greely, H. T., C. Grady, K. M. Ramos, W. Chiong, J. Eberwine, N. A. Farahany, L. S. M. Johnson, B. T. Hyman, S. E. Hyman, K. S. Rommelfanger, et al. 2018. Neuroethics guiding principles for the NIH BRAIN initiative. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 38 (50):10586–8. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2077-18.2018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, S., C. Grady, K. M. Ramos, W. Chiong, J. J. Fins, P. Ford, S. Goering, H. T. Greely, K. Hutchison, M. L. Kelly, et al. 2019. Ethical challenges of risk, informed consent, and posttrial responsibilities in human research with neural devices: A review. JAMA Neurology 76 (12):1506–14. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, L. A., W. T. Newsome, D. J. Anderson, C. I. Bargmann, E. N. Brown, K. Deisseroth, J. P. Donoghue, K. L. Hudson, G. S. F. Ling, P. R. MacLeish, et al. 2015. The BRAIN Initiative: developing technology to catalyse neuroscience discovery. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370 (1668):20140164. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. Y. H., L. Schrock, R. M. Wilson, S. A. Frank, R. G. Holloway, K. Kieburtz, and R. G. de Vries. 2009. An approach to evaluating the therapeutic misconception. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 31 (5):7–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krook-Magnuson, E., J. N. Gelinas, I. Soltesz, and G. Buzsáki. 2015. Neuroelectronics and biooptics: Closed-loop technologies in neurological disorders. JAMA Neurology 72 (7):823–9. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Largent, E., C. Grady, F. G. Miller, and A. Wertheimer. 2013. Misconceptions about coercion and undue influence: Reflections on the views of IRB members. Bioethics 27 (9):500–7. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01972.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, L.,. M. Albert, and W. Levinson. 2008. Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 337:a567. doi:10.1136/bmj.39602.690162.47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morain, S. R., S. Joffe, and E. A. Largent. 2019. When is it ethical for physician-investigators to seek consent from their own patients? American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):11–8. doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1572811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panov, F., E. Levin, C. de Hemptinne, N. C. Swann, S. Qasim, S. Miocinovic, J. L. Ostrem, and P. A. Starr. 2017. Intraoperative electrocorticography for physiological research in movement disorders: Principles and experience in 200 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery 126 (1):122–31. doi:10.3171/2015.11.JNS151341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A., K. Porter, S. Juul, and B. S. Wilfond. 2015. Precluding consent by clinicians who are both the attending and the investigator: An outdated shibboleth? The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB 15 (4):80–2. doi:10.1080/15265161.2015.1011007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudore, R. L., C. S. Landefeld, B. A. Williams, D. E. Barnes, K. Lindquist, and D. Schillinger. 2006. Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: A descriptive study. Journal of General Internal Medicine 21 (8):867–73. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00535.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendler, D., and J. Rackoff. 2002. Consent for continuing research participation: What is it and when should it be obtained? IRB 24 (3):1–6. doi:10.2307/3563787.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar