Virtue Theory for Moral Enhancement

REFERENCES

• Agar, N. 2013a. Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong? Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):67–74. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agar, N. 2013b. Moral bioenhancement is dangerous. Journal of Medical Ethics 41:343–5. doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle , L. Brown, and D. Ross. 2009. The Nicomachean ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balliet, D., C. Parks, and J. Joireman. 2009. Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 12 (4):533–47. doi:10.1177/1368430209105040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, B. 2015. Conceptual and practical problems of moral enhancement. Bioethics 29 (4):233–1. doi:10.1111/bioe.12090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begue, L., J. L. Beauvois, D. Courbet, D. Oberle, J. Lepage, and A. A. Duke. 2015. Personality predicts obedience in a Milgram paradigm. Journal of Personality 83 (3):299–306. doi:10.1111/jopy.12104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilderbeck, A. C., G. D. A. Brown, J. Read, M. Woolrich, P. J. Cowen, T. E. J. Behrens, and R. D. Rogers. 2014. Serotonin and Social norms: Tryptophan depletion impairs social comparison and leads to resource depletion in a multiplayer harvesting game. Psychological Science 25 (7):1303–13. doi:10.1177/0956797614527830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., and H. Gintis. 2013. The coevolution of institutions and behaviors. In A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution, ed. Samuel Bowles; Herbert Gintis, 119–46. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casebeer, W. D., and P. S. Churchland. 2003. The neural mechanisms of moral cognition: A multiple-aspect approach to moral judgment and decision-making. Biology & Philosophy 18 (1):169–94. doi:10.1023/A:1023380907603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, M., and T. Moran. 1990. Psychopathy and moral development: A comparative study of delinquent and nondelinquent youth. Development and Psychopathology 2 (3):227–46. doi:10.1017/S0954579400000742.
   Google Scholar
• Crockett, M. J., L. Clark, G. Tabibnia, M. D. Lieberman, and T. W. Robbins. 2008. Serotonin modulates behavioral reactions to unfairness. Science 320 (5884):1739. doi:10.1126/science.1155577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockett, M. 2013. Models of morality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (8):363–66. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockett, M. J., L. Clark, M. D. Hauser, and T. W. Robbins. 2010. Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (40):17433–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.1009396107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutchfield, P. 2018. Moral enhancement can kill. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (5):568–84. doi:10.1093/jmp/jhy020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutchfield, P. 2020. Engendering moral post‐persons: A novel self‐help strategy. Bioethics 25 (May 2019):bioe.12722. doi:10.1111/bioe.12722.
   Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., and C. D. Batson. 1973. “From Jerusalem to Jericho”: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27 (1):100–8. doi:10.1037/h0034449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., ed. 2014. Social conflict within and between groups. Current issues in social psychology. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., and M. E. Kret. 2016. Oxytocin conditions intergroup relations through upregulated in-group empathy, cooperation, conformity, and defense. Biological Psychiatry 79 (3):165–73. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.03.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Melo-Martin, I., and A. Salles. 2015. Moral bioenhancement: Much ado about nothing? Bioethics 29 (4):223–31. (doi:10.1111/bioe.12100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Raad, B., and B. Mlacic. 2016. The lexical foundation of the big five factor model. In The Oxford Handbook of the Five Factor Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199352487.013.12..
   Google Scholar
• Degrazia, D. 2005. Enhancement technologies and human identity. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):261–83. doi:10.1080/03605310590960166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, T. 2008. Moral enhancement. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):228–45. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00412.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Douglas, T. 2014. The relationship between effort and moral worth: Three amendments to Sorensen’s model. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (2):325–34. doi:10.1007/s10677-013-9441-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreu, C. K. W. d., and P. A. M. van Lange. 1995. The impact of social value orientations on negotiator cognition and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 (11):1178–88. doi:10.1177/01461672952111006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earp, B. D., J. A. Skorburg, J. A. C. Everett, and J. Savulescu. 2018. Addiction, identity, morality. AJOB Empirical Bioethics 10 (2):136–53. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/EVM84.
   Google Scholar
• Eberl, J. T. 2018. Can prudence be enhanced? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (5):506–26. doi:10.1093/jmp/jhy021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabiano, J. 2020. The fragility of moral traits to technological interventions. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-020-09452-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FeldmanHall, O., T. Dalgleish, R. Thompson, D. Evans, S. Schweizer, and D. Mobbs. 2012. Differential neural circuitry and self-interest in real vs hypothetical moral decisions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7 (7):743–51. doi:10.1093/scan/nss069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer-Shofty, M., M. Brüne, A. Ebert, D. Shefet, Y. Levkovitz, and S. G. Shamay-Tsoory. 2013. Improving social perception in schizophrenia: The role of oxytocin. Schizophrenia Research 146 (1–3):357–62. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G. 1999. Moral philosophy meets social psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental attribution error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (3):315–31. doi:10.1111/1467-9264.00062.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. 2009. Skepticism about character traits. The Journal of Ethics 13 (2–3):235–42. doi:10.1007/s10892-009-9050-6.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. 2013. ‘Ethics is for bad guys!' Putting the ‘moral' into moral enhancement! Bioethics 27 (3):169–73. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01946.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. 2015. Moral enhancement requires multiple virtues. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (1):86–95. doi:10.1017/S0963180114000334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hursthouse, R. 2001. On virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199247994.001.0001..
   Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., and P. F. Levin. 1972. Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21 (3):384–88. doi:10.1037/h0032317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, S., E. Lerer, I. Shalev, F. Uzefovsky, M. Riebold, E. Laiba, R. Bachner-Melman, A. Maril, G. Bornstein, A. Knafo, et al. 2009. The Oxytocin Receptor (OXTR) Contributes to prosocial fund allocations in the dictator game and the social value orientations task. Edited by Paul Zak. PLoS One. 4 (5):e5535. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabasenche, W. P. 2012. Moral enhancement worth having: Thinking holistically. AJOB Neuroscience 3 (4):18–20. doi:10.1080/21507740.2012.721464.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L., and R. H. Hersh. 1977. Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory into Practice 16 (2):53–9. doi:10.1080/00405847709542675.
   Google Scholar
• Kosfeld, M., M. Heinrichs, P. J. Zak, U. Fischbacher, and E. Fehr. 2005. Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435 (7042):673–6. doi:10.1038/nature03701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, F., R. Parasuraman, L. Moody, P. Twieg, E. de Visser, K. McCabe, M. O'Hara, and M. R. Lee. 2013. Oxytocin selectively increases perceptions of harm for victims but not the desire to punish offenders of criminal offenses. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 8 (5):494–8. doi:10.1093/scan/nss026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, N., T. Douglas, G. Kahane, S. Terbeck, P. J. Cowen, M. Hewstone, and J. Savulescu. 2014. Are you morally modified?: The moral effects of widely used pharmaceuticals. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 21 (2):111–25. doi:10.1353/ppp.2014.0023.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis, D. 1983. Survival and identity. In Philosophical papers volume I, ed. D. K. Lewis. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195032047.003.0005.
   Google Scholar
• Mcallister, J. W. 2003. Effective complexity as a measure of information content. Philosophy of Science 70 (2):302–7. doi:10.1086/375469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, A. 1981. After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• McMahan, J. 2002. The ethics of killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199396078.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Mela, L. 2011. MacIntyre on personal identity. Public Reason 3 (1):103–13.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. 1974. Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row. doi:10.1177/0094306118779813a.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. B. 2017. Empirical approaches to moral character. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, Winter 201. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Mischel, W., and Y. Shoda. 1995. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review 102 (2):246–68. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, J., R. Zahn, R. de Oliveira-Souza, F. Krueger, and J. Grafman. 2005. Opinion: The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 6 (10):799–809. doi:10.1038/nrn1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molouki, S., and D. M. Bartels. 2017. Personal change and the continuity of the self. Cognitive Psychology 93:1–17. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, T. F. 2015. Preventing ultimate harm as the justification for biomoral modification. Bioethics 29 (5):369–377. doi:10.1111/bioe.12108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, G. E., J. De Freitas, and J. Knobe. 2015. Beliefs about the true self explain asymmetries based on moral judgment. Cognitive Science 39 (1):96–125. doi:10.1111/cogs.12134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2001. The fragility of goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, B. P. 2002. A quantitative review of the comprehensiveness of the five-factor model in relation to popular personality inventories. Assessment 9 (2):188–203. doi:10.1177/1073191102092010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/019824908X.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, C., W. Sinnott-Armstrong, P. E. Koralus, A. Mendelovici, V. McGeer, and T. Wheatley. 2011. Is morality unified? Evidence that distinct neural systems underlie moral judgments of harm, dishonesty, and disgust. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23 (10):3162–3180. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, I., and J. Savulescu. 2012. Unfit for the future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653645.001.0001..
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., and N. Park. 2012. Classifying and measuring strengths of character. In The Oxford handbook of positive psychology, ed. Shane Lopez and C. R. Snyder, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0004..
   Google Scholar
• Rest, J. R., D. Narvaez, S. J. Thoma, and M. J. Bebeau. 2000. A Neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal of Moral Education 29 (4):381–95. doi:10.1080/713679390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, A., and J. Fabiano. 2017. Modeling the social dynamics of moral enhancement: Social strategies sold over the counter and the stability of society. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (3):431–445. doi:10.1017/S0963180116001109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, Y. H. M. 2018. Cognitive-affective processing system. In Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences, 1–7. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1788-2..
   Google Scholar
• Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., M. Fischer, J. Dvash, H. Harari, N. Perach-Bloom, and Y. Levkovitz. 2009. Intranasal administration of oxytocin increases envy and Schadenfreude (gloating). Biological Psychiatry 66 (9):864–870. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shook, J. R. 2012. Neuroethics and the possible types of moral enhancement. AJOB Neuroscience 3 (4):3–14. doi:10.1080/21507740.2012.712602.
   Google Scholar
• Snarey, J. R. 1985. Cross-cultural universality of social-moral development: A critical review of Kohlbergian research. Psychological Bulletin 97 (2):202–32. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.97.2.202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, N. 2010. Virtue as social intelligence: An empirically grounded theory. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, R. 2014a. Better living through chemistry? A reply to Savulescu and Persson on “moral enhancement”. Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (1):23–32. doi:10.1111/japp.12038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, R. 2014b. Unfit for the future: The need for moral enhancement, by Persson, Ingmar, and Julian Savulescu. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (2):404–407. doi:10.1080/00048402.2013.860180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strohminger, N., and S. Nichols. 2014. The essential moral self. Cognition 131 (1):159–71. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, W., and A. Bond. 2002. Serotonergic intervention affects both social dominance and affiliative behaviour. Psychopharmacology 161 (3):324–330. doi:10.1007/s00213-002-1049-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, D., J. te Nijenhuis, and A. B. Bakker. 2010. The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of big five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality 44 (3):315–27. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, B. 1980. The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hooft, S. 2014. Virtue and identity. In The handbook of virtue ethics, ed. Stan Van Hooft, 153–62. Durham: Acumen Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van Lange, P. A. M., R. Bekkers, T. N. M. Schuyt, and M. V. Vugt. 2007. From games to giving: Social value orientation predicts donations to noble causes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 29 (4):375–84. doi:10.1080/01973530701665223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lange, P. A. M., J. Joireman, C. D. Parks, and E. Van Dijk. 2013. The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 120 (2):125–41. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, L. J. 1982. The sequentiality of Kohlberg’s stages of moral development. Child Development 53 (5):1330. doi:10.2307/1129023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, R. M., J. K. Rilling, A. G. Sanfey, Z. Bhagwagar, and R. D. Rogers. 2006. Effects of tryptophan depletion on the performance of an iterated prisoner's dilemma game in healthy adults. Neuropsychopharmacology 31 (5):1075–1084. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, L., and J. Dungan. 2012. Where in the brain is morality? Everywhere and maybe nowhere. Social Neuroscience 7 (1):1–10. doi:10.1080/17470919.2011.569146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar