REFERENCES
- Baker, J. T., L. T. Germine, K. J. Ressler, S. L. Rauch, and W. A. Carlezon. 2018. Digital devices and continuous telemetry: opportunities for aligning psychiatry and neuroscience. Neuropsychopharmacology 43 (13):2499–503. doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0172-z.
- Torous, J., J. P. Onnela, and M. Keshavan. 2017. New dimensions and new tools to realize the potential of RDoC: Digital phenotyping via smartphones and connected devices. Translational Psychiatry 7 (3):e1053–e1053. doi:10.1038/tp.2017.25.
- Insel, T. R. 2017. Digital phenotyping: technology for a new science of behavior. JAMA 318 (13):1215–6. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.11295.
- Martinez-Martin, N., T. R. Insel, P. Dagum, H. T. Greely, and M. K. Cho. 2018. Data mining for health: Staking out the ethical territory of digital phenotyping. NPJ Digital Medicine 1 (1):1–5. doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0075-8.
- Nebeker, C., R. J. Bartlett Ellis, and J. Torous. 2020. Development of a decision-making checklist tool to support technology selection in digital health research. Translational Behavioral Medicine 10 (4):1004–15. doi:10.1093/tbm/ibz074.
REFERENCES
- Gregory, H. 2020. Making a murderer: media renderings of brain injury and Aaron Hernandez as a medical and sporting subject. Social Science & Medicine 244:112598.
- McKee, A. C., R. C. Cantu, C. J. Nowinski, E. T. Hedley-Whyte, B. E. Gavett, A. E. Budson, V. E. Santini, H.-S. Lee, C. A. Kubilus, R. A. Stern, et al. 2009. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in athletes: Progressive tauopathy after repetitive head injury. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology 68 (7):709–35. doi:10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181a9d503.
- Price, G. “NFL player charged with murder: Who is suspect Aaron Hernandez? Former new england patriot appears in court, pleads not guilty.” IBTimes. Com; 2013. https://www.ibtimes.com/nfl-player-charged-murder-who-suspect-aaron-hernandez-former-new-england-patriot-appears-court
- Redding, R. E. 2006. The brain-disordered defendant: Neuroscience and legal insanity in the twenty-first century. American University Law Review 56:51.
- Wasserman, D., and J. Johnston. 2014. Seeing responsibility: Can neuroimaging teach us anything about moral and legal responsibility? Hastings Center Report 44 (s2):S37–S49. doi:10.1002/hast.297.
REFERENCES
- De Pirro, S., G. Galati, L. Pizzamiglio, and A. Badiani. 2018. The affective and neural correlates of heroin versus cocaine use in addiction are influenced by environmental setting but in opposite directions. The Journal of Neuroscience 38 (22):5182–95. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0019-18.2018.
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. 2020. Impact of COVID-19 on patterns of drug use and drug-related harms in Europe. EMCDDA Trendspotter briefing, Lisbon.
REFERENCES
- Marino, L., N. A. Rose, I. N. Visser, H. Rally, H. Ferdowsian, and V. Slootsky. 2020. The harmful effects of captivity and chronic stress on the well-being of orcas (Orcinus orca). Journal of Veterinary Behavior 35:69–82. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2019.05.005.
REFERENCES
- Cif, L., and P. Coubes. 2017. Historical developments in children’s deep brain stimulation. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology 21 (1):109–17. doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.08.010.
- DiFrancesco, M., C. Halpern, H. Hurtig, G. Baltuch, and G. Heuer. 2012. Pediatric indications for deep brain stimulation. Child’s Nervous System 28 (10):1701–14. doi:10.1007/s00381-012-1861-2.
- Elkaim, L., N. Alotaibi, A. Sigal, H. Alotaibi, N. Lipsman, S. Kalia, D. Fehlings, A. Lozano, G. Ibrahim, A. Weil, North American Pediatric DBS Collaboration, et al. 2019. Deep brain stimulation for pediatric dystonia: a meta‐analysis with individual participant data. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 61 (1):49–56. doi:10.1111/dmcn.14063.
- Muñoz, K. A., J. Blumenthal-Barby, E. A. Storch, L. Torgerson, and G. Lázaro-Muñoz. 2020. Pediatric deep brain stimulation for dystonia: Current state and ethical considerations. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (4):557–73. doi:10.1017/S0963180120000316.
REFERENCES
- Leoutsakos, J.-M. S., H. Yan, W. S. Anderson, W. F. Asaad, G. Baltuch, A. Burke, M. M. Chakravarty, K. E. Drake, K. D. Foote, L. Fosdick, et al. 2018. Deep brain stimulation targeting the fornix for mild Alzheimer dementia (the ADvance trial): A two year follow-up including results of delayed activation. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 64 (2):597–606. doi:10.3233/JAD-180121.
- Ponce, F. A., W. F. Asaad, K. D.Foote, W. S.Anderson, G. Rees Cosgrove, G. H. Baltuch, K. Beasley, D. E. Reymers, E. S. Oh, S. D. Targum, et al. 2016. Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the fornix for Alzheimer’s disease: Surgical safety in the ADvance trial. Journal of Neurosurgery 125 (1):75–84. doi:10.3171/2015.6.JNS15716.
- Siegel, A. M., M. S. Barrett, and M. T. Bhati. 2017. Deep brain stimulation for Alzheimer’s disease: Ethical challenges for clinical research. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 56 (2):429–39. doi:10.3233/JAD-160356.
- Taylor, J. S. 2008. On recognition, caring, and dementia. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 22 (4):313–35. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1387.2008.00036.x.
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
- de Haan, S., E. Rietveld, M. Stokhof, and D. Denys. 2015. Effects of deep brain stimulation on the lived experience of obsessive-compulsive disorder patients: In-depth interviews with 18 patients. PLoS One 10 (8):e0135524. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135524.
- Glannon, W. 2009. Stimulating brains, altering minds. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):289–92.
- Schechtman, M. 2010. Philosophical reflections on narrative and deep brain stimulation. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 21 (2):133–9.
- Schüpbach, W. M., and Y. Agid. 2008. Psychosocial adjustment after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Nature Clinical Practice Neurology 4 (2):58–9. doi:10.1038/ncpneuro0714.
- Synofzik, M., and T. E. Schlaepfer. 2008. Stimulating personality: Ethical criteria for deep brain stimulation in psychiatric patients and for enhancement purposes. Biotechnology Journal 3 (12):1511–20. doi:10.1002/biot.200800187.
REFERENCES
- Chen, W., Y. Hu, and D. Ju. 2020. Gene therapy for neurodegenerative disorders: Advances, insights and prospects. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 20: 35–38. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2020.01.015.
- Iyer, A. A., S. Hendriks, and A. Rid. 2020. The challenge of selecting participants fairly in high-demand clinical trials. The American Journal of Bioethics. doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1701746.
- Sudhakar, V., and R. M. Richardson. 2019. Gene therapy for neurodegenerative diseases. Neurotherapeutics 16: 166–176. doi:10.1007/s13311-018-00694-0.
REFERENCES
- Erler, A. 2012. One man’s authenticity is another man’s betrayal: A reply to levy. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (3):257–65. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2012.00562.x.
- Hudson, N. W., R. C. Fraley, W. J. Chopik, and D. A. Briley. 2020. Change goals robustly predict trait growth: A mega-analysis of a dozen intensive longitudinal studies examining volitional change. Social Psychological and Personality Science 11 (6):723–732. doi:10.1177/1948550619878423.
- Kramer, P. D. 1993. Listening to prozac, New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Viking.
- Lucke, J. C., S. Bell, B. Partridge, and W. D. Hall. 2011. Deflating the neuroenhancement bubble. The American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (4):38–43. doi:10.1080/21507740.2011.611122.
- Serretti, A., R. Calati, A. Goracci, M. DI Simplicio, P. Castrogiovanni, and D. DE Ronchi. 2010. Antidepressants in healthy subjects: What are the psychotropic/psychological Effects? European Neuropsychopharmacology 20 (7):433–53. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.11.009.
REFERENCES
- Baylis, F. 2013. “I am who I am”: On the perceived threats to personal identity from deep brain stimulation. Neuroethics 6 (3):513–526. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9137-1.
- James, G., D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2013. An introduction to statistical learning. Vol 112. New York: Springer.
- Reed, C., E. Kennedy, and S. Silva. 2016. Responsibility, autonomy and accountability: Legal liability for machine learning. Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, 243.
REFERENCES
- Collins, K. L., A. Guterstam, J. Cronin, J. D. Olson, H. H. Ehrsson, and J. G. Ojemann. 2017. Ownership of an artificial limb induced by electrical brain stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 114, 166–71
- Kellmeyer, P., T. Cochrane, O. Müller, C. Mitchell, T. Ball, J. J. Fins, and N. Biller-Andorno. 2016. The effects of closed-loop medical devices on the autonomy and accountability of persons and systems. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (4):623–633. doi:10.1017/S0963180116000359.
- Klein, E., and A. Rubel. 2018. Privacy and ethics in brain–computer interface research, 653–668. Routledge.
- Kögel, J., R. J. Jox, and O. Friedrich. 2020. What is it like to use a BCI? – insights from an interview study with brain-computer interface users. BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):2. doi:10.1186/s12910-019-0442-2.
- Schüpbach, M., M. Gargiulo, M. L. Welter, L. Mallet, C. Behar, J. L. Houeto, D. Maltete, V. Mesnage, and Y. Agid. 2006. Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease: A distressed mind in a repaired body? Neurology 66 (12):1811–1816. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000234880.51322.16.
REFERENCES
- Dubljević, V. 2019. Neuroethics, justice and autonomy: Public reason in the cognitive enhancement debate, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Hyun, I., J. C. Scharf-Deering, and J. E. Lunshof. 2020. Ethical issues related to brain organoid research. Brain Research 1732:146653. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146653.
- Lancaster, M. A., M. Renner, C.-A. Martin, D. Wenzel, L. S. Bicknell, M. E. Hurles, T. Homfray, J. M. Penninger, A. P. Jackson, and J. A. Knoblich. 2013. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature 501 (7467):373–9. doi:10.1038/nature12517.
REFERENCES
- Baylis, F. 2013. “I am who I am”: On the perceived threats to personal identity from deep brain stimulation. Neuroethics 6 (3):513–26. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9137-1.
- Bruner, J. S. 1990. Acts of meaning (8th print. ed.). Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
- Hoffman, G. A. 2015. How hyponarrativity may hinder antidepressants’ “Happy Ending.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 22 (4):317–21. doi:10.1353/ppp.2015.0050.
- MacIntyre, A. C. 1984. After virtue (2.Aufl ed.). Notre Dame (Indiana): University of Notre Dame Press.
- Schechtman, M. 2010. Philosophical reflections on narrative and deep brain stimulation. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 21 (2):133–9
REFERENCES
- Davis, K. D. 2016. Legal and ethical issues of using brain imaging to diagnose pain. PAIN Reports 1 (4):e577–6. doi:10.1097/PR9.0000000000000577.
- Davis, K. D., N. Aghaeepour, A. H. Ahn, M. S. Angst, D. Borsook, A. Brenton, M. E. Burczynski, C. Crean, R. Edwards, B. Gaudilliere, et al. 2020. Discovery and validation of biomarkers to aid the development of safe and effective pain therapeutics: Challenges and opportunities. Nature Reviews Neurology 16 (7):381–400. doi:10.1038/s41582-020-0362-2.
- Davis, K. D., H. Flor, H. T. Greely, G. D. Iannetti, S. Mackey, M. Ploner, A. Pustilnik, I. Tracey, R.-D. Treede, and T. D. Wager. 2017. Brain imaging tests for chronic pain: Medical, legal and ethical issues and recommendations. Nature Reviews Neurology 13 (10):624–38. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.122.
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, C., and Education. 2011. Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC.
- Lynch, M. E. 2011. The need for a Canadian pain strategy. Pain Research & Management 16 (2):77–80. doi:10.1155/2011/654651.
REFERENCES
- Morse, S. 2006. Brain overclaim syndrome and criminal responsibility: A diagnostic note. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 3 (2):397.
- Scott, E. S., R. J. Bonnie, and L. Steinberg. 2016. Young adulthood as a transitional legal category: Science, social change, and justice policy. Fordham Law Review 85:641
- Shen, F. X. 2013. Legislating neuroscience: The case of juvenile justice. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 46 (3):985
- Steinberg, L. 2017. Adolescent brain science and juvenile justice policymaking. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 23:410.
REFERENCES
- Brody, B. 2003. Assessing empirical research in bioethics. In Taking issue: Pluralism and casuistry in bioethics, 57–65. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
- Davies, R., J. Ives, and M. Dunn. 2015. A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies. BMC Medical Ethics 16: 5–20. doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0010-3.
- Davidson, D. 1973. On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:5–20. doi:10.2307/3129898.
- Pavarini, G., and I. Singh. 2018. Pragmatic neuroethics: Lived experiences as a source of moral knowledge. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (4):578–89. 10.1017/S0963180118000105.
REFERENCES
- Asai, A., and Y. Kadooka. 2013. Reexamination of the ethics of placebo use in clinical practice. Bioethics 27 (4):186–93. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01943.x.
- Finniss, D. G., T. J. Kaptchuk, F. Miller, and F. Benedetti. 2010. Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects. Lancet 375 (9715):686–95. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61706-2.
- International Society for Neurofeedback and Research (ISNR). 2017. In defense of neurofeedback. https://isnr.org/in-defense-of-neurofeedback
- Thibault, R. T., and A. Raz. 2017. The psychology of neurofeedback: Clinical intervention even if applied placebo. American Psychologist 72 (7):679–88. doi:10.1037/amp0000118.
- Wexler, A., A. Nagappan, D. Kopyto, and R. Choi. 2020. Neuroenhancement for sale: Assessing the website claims of neurofeedback providers in the USA. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement 4 (4):379–10. doi:10.1007/s41465-020-00170-8.
REFERENCES
- Cho, M. K., S. L. Tobin, H. T. Greely, J. McCormick, A. Boyce, and D. Magnus. 2008. Strangers at the benchside: Research ethics consultation. The American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4–13. doi:10.1080/15265160802132951.
- de Melo-Martín, I., L. I. Palmer, and J. J. Fins. 2007. Viewpoint: Developing a research ethics consultation service to foster responsive and responsible clinical research. Academic Medicine 82 (9):900–4.
- Fisher, E., M. O’Rourke, R. Evans, E. B. Kennedy, M. E. Gorman, and T. P. Seager. 2015. Mapping the integrative field: Taking stock of socio-technical collaborations. Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (1):39–61. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671.
- Goering, S., and K. Klein. 2020. Embedding ethics in neural engineering: An integrated transdisciplinary collaboration. In A guide to field philosophy: Case studies and practical strategies, eds. Brister and Frodeman , 17–34. Routledge.
- Tubig, P., and D. McCusker. 2021. Fostering the trustworthiness of researchers: SPECS and the role of ethical reflexivity in novel neurotechnology research. Research Ethics 17 (2):143–61. doi:10.1177/1747016120952500.
REFERENCES
- Elkaim, L. M., P. De Vloo, S. K. Kalia, A. M. Lozano, and G. M. Ibrahim. 2018. Deep brain stimulation for childhood dystonia: Current evidence and emerging practice. Expert Rev Neurotherapeutics 18 (10):773–84. doi:10.1080/14737175.2018.1523721.
- Hale, A. T., M. A. Monsour, J. D. Rolston, R. P. Naftel, and D. J. Englot. 2020. Deep brain stimulation in pediatric dystonia: A systematic review. Neurosurgical Review 43 (3):873–80. doi:10.1007/s10143-018-1047-9.
- Schermer, M. 2011. Ethical issues in deep brain stimulation. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 5:17. doi:10.3389/fnint.2011.00017.
REFERENCES
- Chan, A. K., R. A. McGovern, L. T. Brown, J. P. Sheehy, B. E. Zacharia, C. B. Mikell, S. S. Bruce, B. Ford, and G. M. McKhann. 2014. Disparities in access to deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson disease: Interaction between African American race and Medicaid use. JAMA Neurology 71 (3):291–9. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5798.
- Cornum, L. 2015, January 26. The space NDN’s star map. The New Inquiry. https://thenewinquiry.com/the-space-ndns-star-map/.
- Honey, C. M., A. K. Malhotra, M. S. Tamber, M. Prud’homme, I. Mendez, and C. R. Honey. 2018. Canadian assessment of deep brain stimulation access: The Canada study. Canadian Journal of Neurological Science 45 (5):553–558. doi:10.1017/cjn.2018.268.
REFERENCES
- Coates McCall, I., C. Lau, N. Minielly, and J. Illes. 2019. Owning ethical innovation: Claims about commercial wearable brain technologies. Neuron 102 (4):728–31. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.03.026.
- Ienca, M., P. Haselager, and E. J. Emanuel. 2018. Brain leaks and consumer neurotechnology. Nature Biotechnology 36 (9):805–10. doi:10.1038/nbt.4240.
- Minielly, N., V. Hrincu, and J. Illes. 2020a. A view on incidental findings and adverse events associated with neurowearables in the consumer marketplace. In DNB 3: Ethical dimensions of commercial and DIY neurotechnologies, ed. I. Bard and E. Hildt, 1st ed. Elsevier, Academic Press.
- Minielly, N., V. Hrincu, and J. Illes. 2020b. Privacy challenges to the democratization of brain data. IScience 23 (6):101134. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101134.
- Wexler, A. 2019. Separating neuroethics from neurohype. Nature Biotechnology 37 (9):988–90. doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0230-z.
REFERENCES
- Borry, P., L. Stultiens, H. Nys, J.-J. Cassiman, and K. Dierickx. 2006. Presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in minors: A systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Clinical Genetics 70 (5):374–81. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00692.x.
- Emerson, R. W., C. Adams, T. Nishino, H. C. Hazlett, J. J. Wolff, L. Zwaigenbaum, J. N. Constantino, M. D. Shen, M. R. Swanson, J. T. Elison, IBIS Network, et al. 2017. Functional neuroimaging of high-risk 6-month-old infants predicts a diagnosis of autism at 24 months of age. Science Translational Medicine 9 (393):eaag2882. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aag2882.
- Gabard-Durnam, L. J., C. Wilkinson, K. Kapur, H. Tager-Flusberg, A. R. Levin, and C. A. Nelson. 2019. Longitudinal EEG power in the first postnatal year differentiates autism outcomes. Nature Communications 10 (1):4188–12. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12202-9.
- Hazlett, H. C., H. Gu, B. C. Munsell, S. H. Kim, M. Styner, J. J. Wolff, J. T. Elison, M. R. Swanson, H. Zhu, K. N. Botteron, Statistical Analysis, et al. 2017. Early brain development in infants at high risk for autism spectrum disorder. Nature 542 (7641):348–51. doi:10.1038/nature21369.
- MacDuffie, K. E., A. M. Estes, H. L. Peay, J. R. Pruett, Jr, and B. S. Wilfond. 2021. The Ethics of Predicting Autism Spectrum Disorder in Infancy. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (e-pub ahead of print)
- MacDuffie, K. E., L. Turner-Brown, A. M. Estes, B. S. Wilfond, S. R. Dager, J. Pandey, L. Zwaigenbaum, K. N. Botteron, J. R. Pruett, Jr J. Piven, IBIS Network, et al. 2020. “If he has it, we know what to do”: Parent perspectives on familial risk for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 45 (2):121–30. doi:10.1038/nature21369.
- MacDuffie, K. E., J. R. Pruett, J. Piven, A. Estes, J. Wolff, L. H. Harrington, H. Peay, and B. Wilfond. In press. Anticipating the ethical issues in clinical trials for presymptomatic interventions for autism spectrum disorder. Pediatrics
- Sturner, R., B. Howard, P. Bergmann, T. Morrel, R. Landa, K. Walton, and D. Marks. 2017. Accurate autism screening at the 18-month well-child visit requires different strategies than at 24 months. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 47 (10):3296–310. doi:10.1007/s10803-017-3231-0.
REFERENCES
- Chowkwanyun, M., and A. L. Reed. 2020. Racial health disparities and Covid-19 — caution and context. New England Journal of Medicine 383 (3):201–203. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2012910.
- Creary, M., and P. J. Fleming. 2020, May 2. Opinion: What’s behind the racial disparity in COVID-19 cases. Opinion | What’s behind the racial disparity in Michigan coronavirus cases | Bridge Magazine. https://www.bridgemi.com/guest-commentary/opinion-whats-behind-racial-disparity-covid-19-cases.
- Fink, A. E. 2020. Graphic neuroethics: A comics-making curriculum (part I of II). The Neuroethics Blog. Retrieved on July 10, 2020, from http://www.theneuroethicsblog.com/2020/04/graphic-neuroethics-comics-making.html.
- Hue, G. E. 2020. Justice, justification, and neuroethics as a tool. The American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):221–223. doi:10.1080/21507740.2020.1838165.
- Pak, C. 2020, April 30. Disability, visibility and the COVID-19 crisis. Medical Humanities. https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-humanities/2020/04/30/disability-visibility-and-the-covid-19-crisis/.
- World Health Organization. 2020. Timeline of WHO’s response to COVID-19. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/29-06-2020-covidtimeline.
REFERENCES
- Dehaene, S., and J. P. Changeux. 2004. Neural mechanisms for access to consciousness. In The cognitive neurosciences, ed. M. S. Gazzaniga, 1145–57. Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press.
- Lamond, G. 2006. Precedent and analogy in legal reasoning. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/legal-reas-prec/.
- Piccinini, G., and S. Bahar. 2013. Neural computation and the computational theory of cognition. Cognitive Science 37 (3):453–88. doi:10.1111/cogs.12012.
- Piccinini, G., and A. Scarantino. 2010. Computation vs. information processing: Why their difference matters to cognitive science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):237–46. doi:10.1080/21507740.2020.1838165.
- Yuste, R., S. Goering, B. A. y Arcas, G. Bi, J. M. Carmena, A. Carter, J. J. Fins, P. Friesen, J. Gallant, J. E. Huggins, et al. 2017. Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature News 551 (7679):159–63. doi:10.1038/551159a.
REFERENCES
- Chang, E. A., M. L. Tomov, S. T. Suhr, J. Luo, Z. T. Olmsted, J. L. Paluh, and J. Cibelli. 2015. Derivation of ethnically diverse human induced pluripotent stem cell lines. Scientific Reports 5:15234. doi:10.1038/srep15234.
- Ghaffari, L. T., A. Starr, A. T. Nelson, and R. Sattler. 2018. Representing diversity in the dish: Using patient-derived in vitro models to recreate the heterogeneity of neurological disease. Front Neurosci 12:56. doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00056.
- Perez-Rodriguez, J., and A. de la Fuente. 2017. Now is the time for a postracial medicine: Biomedical research, the National Institutes of Health, and the perpetuation of scientific racism. The American Journal of Bioethics 17 (9):36–47. doi:10.1080/15265161.2017.1353165.
- Northrup, H., and D. A. Krueger, International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Group 2013. Tuberous Sclerosis complex diagnostic criteria update: Recommendations of the 2012 International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference. Pediatric Neurology 49 (4):243–54. doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.08.001.