REFERENCES
- Birch, J., and H. Browning. 2021. Neural organoids and the precautionary principle. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (1):56–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1845858.
- Dubljević, V., K. Trettenbach, and R. Ranisch. 2022. The socio-political roles of neuroethics and the case of Klotho. AJOB Neuroscience 13 (1):10–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2021.1896597.
- Farah, M. J. 2012. Neuroethics: The ethical, legal, and societal impact of neuroscience. Annual Review of Psychology 63:571–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100438.
- Fitz, N. S., R. Nadler, P. Manogaran, E. W. Chong, and P. B. Reiner. 2014. Public attitudes toward cognitive enhancement. Neuroethics 7 (2):173–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-013-9190-z.
- Levy, N. 2007. Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st century. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Racine, E. 2010. Pragmatic neuroethics: Improving treatment and understanding of the mind-brain. London: MIT Press.
- Veit, W. 2018a. Procreative beneficence and genetic enhancement. KRITERION 32 (1):75–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11026.89289.
- Veit, W. 2018b. Enhancement technologies and inequality. In Proceedings of the IX Conference of the Spanish Society of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, ed. C. Saborido, S. Oms, and J. González de Prado, 471–476. doi:https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21932.08326.
- Veit, W. 2018c. Cognitive enhancement and the threat of inequality. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement 2 (4):404–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-018-0108-x.
- Veit, W., and H. Browning. 2020. Why socio-political beliefs trump individual morality: An evolutionary perspective. AJOB Neuroscience 11 (4):290–2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2020.1830879.
- Veit, W., B. D. Earp, N. Faber, N. Bostrom, J. Caouette, A. Mannino, L. Caviola, A. Sandberg, and J. Savulescu. 2020. Recognizing the diversity of cognitive enhancements. AJOB Neuroscience 11 (4):250–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2020.1830878.