REFERENCES
- Dubljević, V., K. Trettenbach, and R. Ranisch. 2022. The socio-political roles of neuroethics and the case of Klotho. AJOB Neuroscience 13 (1):10–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2021.1896597.
- Habermas, J. 2013. Reply to my critics. In: Habermas and religion, eds. C. Calhoun, E. Mendieta, J. VanAntwerpen. Cambridge: Polity Press, 347–390.
- Hume, D. 1739-40/2006. A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Kant, I. 1798/2006. Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view, ed. R. B. Louden. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Lavazza, A. 2016. Neuroethics: A new framework – from bioethics to anthropology. In: Frontiers in neuroethics. conceptual and empirical advancements, ed. A. Lavazza. Newcastle on Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 9–32.
- Lavazza, A., and F. Corso. 2021. Neurolaw and the mind-brain problem in practice: The case of psychological immaturity and brain immaturity. Theory and Criticism of Social Regulation 1 (22):39–59.
- Lavazza, A., and M. De Caro. 2010. Not so fast. On some bold neuroscientific claims concerning human agency. Neuroethics 3 (1):23–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-009-9053-9.
- Racine, E. 2010. Pragmatic neuroethics: Improving treatment and understanding of the mind/brain. Cambridge, MA: The Mit Press.
- Roskies, A. 2002. Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron 35 (1):21–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00763-8.
- Sellars, W. 1963. Philosophy and the scientific image of man. In: Empiricism and the philosophy of mind, ed. W. Sellars, 1–40. London: Routledge.