Researcher Views on Changes in Personality, Mood, and Behavior in Next-Generation Deep Brain Stimulation

REFERENCES

• Abbes, M., E. Lhommée, S. Thobois, H. Klinger, E. Schmitt, A. Bichon, A. Castrioto, J. Xie, V. Fraix, A. Kistner, et al. 2018. Subthalamic stimulation and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: Results from a long-term follow-up cohort study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 89 (8):836–43. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2017-316373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agid, Y., M. Schüpbach, M. Gargiulo, L. Mallet, J. L. Houeto, C. Behar, D. Maltête, V. Mesnage, and M. L. Welter. 2006. Neurosurgery in Parkinson’s disease: The doctor is happy, the patient less so? In Parkinson’s Disease and related disorders. Journal of neural transmission 70, supplementa, ed. P. Riederer, H. Reichmann, M. B. H. Youdim, M. Gerlach, 409–414. Vienna: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baylis, F. 2013. “I Am Who I Am”: On the perceived threats to personal identity from deep brain stimulation. Neuroethics 6 (3):513–26. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9137-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, E., B. Maxwell, M. P. McAndrews, A. Sadikot, and E. Racine. 2011. Deep brain stimulation and ethics: Perspectives from a multisite qualitative study of Canadian neurosurgical centers. World Neurosurgery 76 (6):537–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluhm, R., and L. Y. Cabrera. 2021. It’s not just counting that counts: A reply to Gilbert, Viaña, and Ineichen. Neuroethics 14 (S1):23–6. doi:10.1007/s12152-018-9391-6.
   Google Scholar
• Bluhm, R., L. Cabrera, and R. McKenzie. 2020. What we (should) talk about when we talk about deep brain stimulation and personal identity. Neuroethics 13 (3):289–301. doi:10.1007/s12152-019-09396-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. F., and B. L. Lambert. 2001. The theory-ladenness of observation and the theory-ladenness of the rest of the scientific process. Philosophy of Science 68 (S3):S176–S86. nodoi:10.1086/392907.
   Google Scholar
• Caruso, J. P., and J. P. Sheehan. 2017. Psychosurgery, ethics, and media: A history of Walter Freeman and the lobotomy. Journal of Neurosurgery 43 (3):E6.
   Google Scholar
• Christen, M., C. Ineichen, M. Bittlinger, H.-W. Bothe, and S. Müller. 2014. Ethical focal points in the international practice of deep brain stimulation. AJOB Neuroscience 5 (4):65–80. doi:10.1080/21507740.2014.939380.
   Google Scholar
• Christen, M., and S. Müller. 2011. Single cases promote knowledge transfer in the field of DBS. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 5:13. doi:10.3389/fnint.2011.00013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cyron, D. 2016. Mental side effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders: The futility of denial. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 10:17. doi:10.3389/fnint.2016.00017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haan, S. 2017. Missing oneself or becoming oneself? The difficulty of what “Becoming a different person” means. AJOB Neuroscience 8 (2):110–2. doi:10.1080/21507740.2017.1320330.
   Google Scholar
• de Haan, S., E. Rietveld, M. Stokhof, and D. Denys. 2013. The phenomenology of deep brain stimulation-induced changes in OCD: An enactive affordance-based model. Front Hum Neurosci 7:653. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haan, S., E. Rietveld, M. Stokhof, and D. Denys. 2015. Effects of deep brain stimulation on the lived experience of obsessive-compulsive disorder patients: In-depth interviews with 18 patients. PLoS One 10 (8):e0135524. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haan, S., E. Rietveld, M. Stokhof, and D. Denys. 2017. Becoming more oneself? Changes in personality following DBS treatment for psychiatric disorders: Experiences of OCD patients and general considerations. PLoS One 12 (4):e0175748. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGrazia, D. 2005. Human identity and bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, H. T. Jr, 1976. Ideology and etiology. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1 (3):256–68. doi:10.1093/jmp/1.3.256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassino, S., G. Abbate Daga, C. Gramaglia, A. Pierò, M. Zibetti, L. Castelli, A. Cinquepalmi, M. L. Notte, and L. Lopiano. 2010. Novelty-seeking in Parkinson’s disease after deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus: A case-control study. Psychosomatics 51 (1):62–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. 2021. Deep brain stimulation, self and relational autonomy. Neuroethics 14 (1):31–43. doi:10.1007/s12152-018-9355-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, J., N. Warren, A. Carter, P. H. Mason, and J. Dominguez. 2017. DBS as a ‘technological fix’ or a ‘regime of care’? Recognizing the importance of narrative identity in neurosurgical services. AJOB Neuroscience 8 (3):192–4. doi:10.1080/21507740.2017.1366581.
   Google Scholar
• Gibert, S. H. 2017. Closed-loop deep brain stimulation and its compatibility with autonomous agency. AJOB Neuroscience 8 (2):88–90. doi:10.1080/21507740.2017.1320326.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, F., E. Goddard, J. N. M. Viaña, A. Carter, and M. Horne. 2017. I miss being me: Phenomenological effects of deep brain stimulation. AJOB Neuroscience 8 (2):96–109. doi:10.1080/21507740.2017.1320319.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, F., J. N. M. Viaña, and C. Ineichen. 2021. Deflating the “DBS causes personality changes” bubble. Neuroethics 14 (S1):1–17. doi:10.1007/s12152-018-9373-8.
   Google Scholar
• Gisquet, E. 2008. Cerebral implants and Parkinson’s disease: A unique form of biographical disruption? Social Science & Medicine 67 (11):1847–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glannon, W. 2009. Stimulating brains, altering minds. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):289–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, E. 2017. Deep brain stimulation through the “lens of agency”: Clarifying threats to personal identity from neurological intervention. Neuroethics 10 (3):325–35. doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9297-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goering, S. 2014. Is it still me? DBS, agency, and the extended, relational me. AJOB Neuroscience 5 (4):50–1. doi:10.1080/21507740.2014.951782.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, S. 2015. Stimulating autonomy: DBS and the prospect of choosing to control ourselves through stimulation. AJOB Neuroscience 6 (4):1–3. doi:10.1080/21507740.2015.1106274.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, S., E. Klein, D. D. Dougherty, and A. S. Widge. 2017. Staying in the loop: Relational agency and identity in next-generation DBS for psychiatry. AJOB Neuroscience 8 (2):59–70. doi:10.1080/21507740.2017.1320320.
   Google Scholar
• Guidetti, M., S. Marceglia, A. Loh, I. E. Harmsen, S. Meoni, G. Foffani, A. M. Lozano, E. Moro, J. Volkmann, and A. Priori. 2021. Clinical perspectives of adaptive deep brain stimulation. Brain Stimulation 14 (5):1238–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, N. R. 1958. Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houeto, J. L., V. Mesnage, L. Mallet, B. Pillon, M. Gargiulo, S. Tezenas Du Moncel, A. M. Bonnet, B. Pidoux, D. Dormont, P. Cornu, et al. 2002. Behavioural disorders, Parkinson’s disease and subthalamic stimulation. Neurology. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 72 (6):701–7. doi:10.1136/jnnp.72.6.701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ineichen, C., H. Baumann-Vogel, and M. Christen. 2016. Deep brain stimulation: In search of reliable instruments for assessing complex personality-related changes. Brain Sciences 6 (3):40. doi:10.3390/brainsci6030040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ineichen, C., and M. Christen. 2017. Hypo- and hyperagentic psychiatric states, next-generation closed-loop DBS, and the question of agency. AJOB Neuroscience 8 (2):77–9. doi:10.1080/21507740.2017.1320338.
   Google Scholar
• Kiverstein, J., E. Rietveld, and D. Denys. 2017. Could closed-loop DBS enhance a person's feeling of being free? AJOB Neuroscience 8 (2):86–7. doi:10.1080/21507740.2017.1320331.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, E., S. Goering, J. Gagne, C. V. Shea, R. Franklin, S. Zorowitz, D. D. Dougherty, and A. S. Widge. 2016. Brain-computer interface-based control of closed-loop brain stimulation: Attitudes and ethical considerations. Brain-Computer Interfaces 3 (3):140–8. doi:10.1080/2326263X.2016.1207497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, F. 2013a. Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (12):757–60. doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, F. 2013b. Me, myself and my brain implant: Deep brain stimulation raises questions of personal authenticity and alienation. Neuroethics 6 (3):483–97. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9115-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, J. K., N. Lipsman, T. Aziz, A. Boutet, P. Brown, J. W. Chang, B. Davidson, W. M. Grill, M. I. Hariz, A. Horn, et al. 2021. Technology of deep brain stimulation: Current status and future directions. Nature Reviews. Neurology 17 (2):75–87. doi:10.1038/s41582-020-00426-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreitmair, K. 2017. Two concerns regarding subjectively perceived self-estrangement. AJOB Neuroscience 8 (2):124–5. doi:10.1080/21507740.2017.1320322.
   Google Scholar
• Kubu, C. S., P. J. Ford, J. A. Wilt, A. R. Merner, M. Montpetite, J. Zeigler, and E. Racine. 2021. Pragmatism and the importance of interdisciplinary teams in investigating personality changes following DBS. Neuroethics 14 (S1):95–105. doi:10.1007/s12152-019-09418-3.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lázaro-Muñoz, G., A. L. McGuire, and W. K. Goodman. 2017. Should we be concerned about preserving agency and personal identity in patients with Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation systems. AJOB Neuroscience 8 (2):73–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lázaro-Muñoz, G., P. Zuk, S. Pereira, K. Kostick, L. Torgerson, D. Sierra-Mercado, M. Majumder, J. Blumenthal-Barby, E. A. Storch, W. K. Goodman, et al. 2019. Neuroethics at 15: Keep the Kant but add more Bacon. AJOB Neuroscience 10 (3):97–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis, C. J., F. Maier, N. Horstkötter, A. Zywczok, K. Witt, C. Eggers, T. D. Meyer, T. A. Dembek, M. Maarouf, E. Moro, et al. 2015. Subjectively perceived personality and mood changes associated with subthalamic stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease. Psychological Medicine 45 (1):73–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lhommée, E., F. Boyer, M. Wack, P. Pélissier, H. Klinger, E. Schmitt, A. Bichon, V. Fraix, S. Chabardès, P. Mertens, et al. 2017. Personality, dopamine, and Parkinson's disease: Insights from subthalamic stimulation. Movement Disorders 32 (8):1191–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, J. 1976. The concept of disease. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1 (3):238–55. doi:10.1093/jmp/1.3.238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, D., N. Lipsman, and M. Bernstein. 2010. Neurosurgeons’ perspectives on psychosurgery and neuroenhancement: A qualitative study at one center. Journal of Neurosurgery 113 (6):1212–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meynen, G., and G. Widdershoven. 2014. Why authenticity may be an inherent bioethical DBS concern. AJOB Neuroscience 5 (1):37–9. doi:10.1080/21507740.2013.863254.
   Google Scholar
• Morar, N., and J. A. Skorburg. 2017. Relational agency: Yes—but how far? Vulnerability and the moral self. AJOB Neuroscience 8 (2):83–5. doi:10.1080/21507740.2017.1326409.
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, P. E., K. Robinson, T. Coyne, P. Silburn, M. Breakspear, and A. Carter. 2021. Woe betides anybody who tries to turn me down.’ A qualitative analysis of neuropsychiatric symptoms following subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Neuroethics 14 (S1):47–63. doi:10.1007/s12152-019-09410-x.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, S., and M. Christen. 2011. Deep brain stimulation in parkinsonian patients – Ethical evaluation of cognitive, affective, and behavioral sequelae. AJOB Neuroscience 2 (1):3–13. doi:10.1080/21507740.2010.533151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muñoz, K. A., K. Kostick, C. Sanchez, L. Kalwani, L. Torgerson, R. Hsu, D. Sierra-Mercado, J. O. Robinson, S. Outram, B. A. Koenig, et al. 2020. Researcher perspectives on ethical considerations in adaptive deep brain stimulation trials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14:578695. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.578695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIH ACD BRAIN Initiative Neuroethics Subgroup. 2019. The BRAIN Initiative® and neuroethics: Enabling and enhancing neuroscience advances for society. National Institutes of Health. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Accessed July 26, 2021. https://braininitiative.nih.gov/strategic-planning/acd-working-groups/brain-initiative%C2%AE-and-neuroethics-enabling-and-enhancing.
   Google Scholar
• Nyholm, S. V. E. N., and E. O’Neill. 2016. Deep brain stimulation, continuity over time, and the true self. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (4):647–58. doi:10.1017/S0963180116000372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neal, C. M., C. M. Baker, C. A. Glenn, A. K. Conner, and M. E. Sughrue. 2017. Dr. Robert G. Heath: A controversial figure in the history of deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgical Focus 43 (3):E12. doi:10.3171/2017.6.FOCUS17252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas, L., S. Horwitz, C. Green, J. Wisdom, N. Duan, and K. Hoagwood. 2015. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 42 (5):533–44. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, U., A.-K. Solbakk, I.-M. Skogseid, M. Toft, A. H. Pripp, A. E. Konglund, S. Andersson, I. R. Haraldsen, D. Aarsland, E. Dietrichs, et al. 2015. Personality changes after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s Disease 2015:490507. doi:10.1155/2015/490507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provenza, N. R., E. R. Matteson, A. B. Allawala, A. Barrios-Anderson, S. A. Sheth, A. Viswanathan, E. McIngvale, E. A. Storch, M. J. Frank, N. C. R. McLaughlin, et al. 2019. The case for adaptive neuromodulation to treat severe intractable mental disorders. Frontiers in Neuroscience 13:152. doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, J. 2020. Clarifying the normative significance of ‘personality changes' following deep brain stimulation. Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1655–80. doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00207-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, J., H. Maslen, and J. Savulescu. 2017. The need for further fine-grained distinctions in discussions of authenticity and deep brain stimulation. AJOB Neuroscience 8 (3):W1–W3. W3. doi:10.1080/21507740.2017.1380727.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, J., L. Pycroft, H. Maslen, T. Aziz, and J. Savulescu. 2021. Evidence-based neuroethics, deep brain stimulation and personality-deflating, but not bursting, the bubble. Neuroethics 14 (S1):27–38. doi:10.1007/s12152-018-9392-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramirez-Zamora, A., J. Giordano, A. Gunduz, J. Alcantara, J. N. Cagle, S. Cernera, P. Difuntorum, R. S. Eisinger, J. Gomez, S. Long, et al. 2020. Proceedings of the seventh annual deep brain stimulation think tank: Advances in neurophysiology, adaptive DBS, virtual reality, neuroethics and technology. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14:54. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., J. Sim, T. Kingstone, S. Baker, J. Waterfield, B. Bartlam, H. Burroughs, and C. Jinks. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity 52 (4):1893–907. 4 doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechtman, M. 2010. Philosophical reflections on narrative and deep brain stimulation. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 21 (2):133–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermer, M. 2009. Changes in the self: The need for conceptual research next to empirical research. The American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):45–7. doi:10.1080/15265160902788744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüpbach, M., M. Gargiulo, M. L. Welter, L. Mallet, C. Béhar, J. L. Houeto, D. Maltête, V. Mesnage, and Y. Agid. 2006. Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease: A distressed mind in a repaired body. Neurology 66 (12):1811–6. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000234880.51322.16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., P. Zuk, and C. T. Scott. 2021. Scientific and ethical uncertainties in brain organoid research. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (1):48–51. doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1845866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snoek, A., S. de Haan, M. Schermer, and D. Horstkötter. 2021. On the significance of the identity debate in DBS and the need of an inclusive research agenda. A reply to Gilbert, Viana and Ineichen. Neuroethics 14 (S1):65–74. doi:10.1007/s12152-019-09411-w.
   Google Scholar
• Synofzik, M., and T. E. Schlaepfer. 2008. Stimulating personality: Ethical criteria for deep brain stimulation in psychiatric patients and for enhancement purposes. Biotechnology Journal 3 (12):1511–20. doi:10.1002/biot.200800187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomson, C. J., R. A. Segrave, and A. Carter. 2021. Changes in personality associated with deep brain stimulation: A qualitative evaluation of clinician perspectives. Neuroethics 14 (S1):109–24. doi:10.1007/s12152-019-09419-2.
   Google Scholar
• Vazire, S., and E. N. Carlson. 2010. Self-knowledge of personality: Do people know themselves? Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4 (8):605–20. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00280.x.
   Google Scholar
• Vazire, S., and E. N. Carlson. 2011. Others sometimes know us better than we know ourselves. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20 (2):104–8. doi:10.1177/0963721411402478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkmann, J., C. Daniels, and K. Witt. 2010. Neuropsychiatric effects of subthalamic neurostimulation in Parkinson disease. Nature Reviews. Neurology 6 (9):487–98. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukov, J. M. 2017a. Three kinds of agency and closed-loop neural devices. AJOB Neuroscience 8 (2):90–1. doi:10.1080/21507740.2017.1320324.
   Google Scholar
• Vukov, J. M. 2017b. Why narrative identity matters: Preserving authenticity in neurosurgical interventions. AJOB Neuroscience 8 (3):186–8. doi:10.1080/21507740.2017.1371809.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, K., C. Daniels, J. Reiff, P. Krack, J. Volkmann, M. O. Pinsker, M. Krause, V. Tronnier, M. Kloss, A. Schnitzler, et al. 2008. Neuropsychological and psychiatric changes after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: A randomised, multicentre study. The Lancet. Neurology 7 (7):605–14. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70114-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, K., J. Kuhn, L. Timmermann, M. Zurowski, and C. Woopen. 2013. Deep brain stimulation and the search for identity. Neuroethics 6 (3):499–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuk, P., and G. Lázaro-Muñoz. 2021. DBS and autonomy: Clarifying the role of theoretical neuroethics. Neuroethics. Neuroethics 14 (S1):83–93. doi:10.1007/s12152-019-09417-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zuk, P., C. E. Sanchez, K. Kostick, L. Torgerson, K. A. Muñoz, R. Hsu, L. Kalwani, D. Sierra-Mercado, J. O. Robinson, S. Outram, et al. 2020. Researcher perspectives on data sharing in deep brain stimulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14:578687. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.578687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar