https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4133-8564
REFERENCES
- Coeckelbergh, M. 2021. How to use virtue ethics for thinking about the moral standing of social robots: A relational interpretation in terms of practices, habits, and performance. International Journal of Social Robotics 13(1): 31–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00707-z.
- Danaher, J. 2018. Chapter 12: The law and ethics of virtual sexual assault. In Research handbook on the law of virtual and augmented reality, 363–388. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Duranske, B. 2007. Reader roundtable: ‘Virtual Rape Claim Brings Belgian Police to Second Life’. 24 April 2007, Virtually Blind, https://virtuallyblind.com/2007/04/24/open-roundtable-allegations-of-virtual-rape-bring-belgian-police-to-second-life/
- Floridi, L. 2015. The Onlife Manifesto. Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Cham: Springer.
- Garasic, M. D. 2015. Guantanamo and other cases of enforced medical treatment-A biopolitical analysis. Cham: Springer.
- Garasic, M. D. 2017. Force-feeding, hunger strikes, Guantanamo and autonomy: Replies to George Annas, Charles Foster and Michael Gross. Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (1):28–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2016-103720.
- Garasic, M. D. 2021. The war of ethical worlds: Why an acceptance of Posthumanism on Mars does not imply a follow up on Earth. Medicina e Morale 70 (3):317–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2021.944.
- Gunkel, D. J. 2018. Robot rights. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Ienca, M., and R. Andorno. 2017. Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (1):5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1.
- Ligthart, S., G. Meynen, N. Biller-Andorno, T. Kooijmans, and P. Kellmeyer. 2022. Is virtually everything possible? The relevance of ethics and human rights for introducing extended reality in forensic psychiatry. AJOB Neuroscience 13(3): 144–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2021.1898489.
- Strikwerda, L. 2015. Present and future instances of virtual rape in light of three categories of legal philosophical theories on rape. Philosophy & Technology 28 (4):491–510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-014-0167-6.