The Conditions for Ethical Chemical Restraints

REFERENCES

• American College of Emergency Physicians. 2020. Use of patient restraints. Dallas, TX: American College of Emergency Physicians. https://www.acep.org/globalassets/new-pdfs/policy-statements/use-of-patient-restraints.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bublitz, J. C. (n.d.). (2014). Freedom of thought in the age of neuroscience: A plea and a proposal for the renaissance of a forgotten fundamental right. ARSP: Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie/Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bublitz, J. C., and R. Merkel. 2014. Crimes against minds: On mental manipulations, harms and a human right to mental self-determination. Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):51–77. doi:10.1007/s11572-012-9172-y.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2008. Hospitals – Restraint/seclusion interpretive guidelines & updated state operations manual (SOM) appendix A. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/Downloads/SCLetter08-18.pdf. (accessed February 23, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Chernik, D. A., D. Gillings, H. Laine, J. Hendler, J. M. Silver, A. B. Davidson, E. M. Schwam, and J. L. Siegel. 1990. Validity and reliability of the observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale: Study with intravenous midazolam. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 10 (4):244–51. doi:10.1097/00004714-199008000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croxall, C., M. Tyas, and J. Garside. 2014. Sedation and its psychological effects following intensive care. British Journal of Nursing 23 (14):800–4. doi:10.12968/bjon.2014.23.14.800.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crutchfield, P., T. S. Gibb, M. J. Redinger, D. Ferman, and J. Livingstone. 2019. The conditions for ethical application of restraints. Chest 155 (3):617–25. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2018.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currier, G. W. 2003. The controversy over “chemical restraint” in acute care psychiatry. Journal of Psychiatric Practice® 9 (1):59–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Detriche, O., J. Berré, J. Massaut, and J. L. Vincent. 1999. The Brussels Sedation Scale: Use of a simple clinical sedation scale can avoid excessive sedation in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. British Journal of Anaesthesia 83 (5):698–701. doi:10.1093/bja/83.5.698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, T. 2014. Criminal rehabilitation through medical intervention: Moral liability and the right to bodily integrity. The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):101–22. doi:10.1007/s10892-014-9161-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Douglas, T. 2022. If nudges treat their targets as rational agents, nonconsensual neurointerventions can too. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25 (2):369–84. doi:10.1007/s10677-022-10285-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, T., and L. Forsberg. 2021. Three rationales for a legal right to mental integrity. In Ligthart, S., van Toor, D., Kooijmans, T., Douglas, T., Meynen, G. (eds), Nerolaw. Palgrave Studies in Law, Neuroscience, and Human Behavior 179–201. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69277-3_8.
   Google Scholar
• Ely, E. W., B. Truman, A. Shintani, J. W. W. Thomason, A. P. Wheeler, S. Gordon, J. Francis, T. Speroff, S. Gautam, R. Margolin, et al. 2003. Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: Reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). JAMA 289 (22):2983–91. doi:10.1001/jama.289.22.2983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D. 2008. The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In Moral psychology, vol 3: The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development, 35–80. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, P., and M. B. Mycyk. 2020. Physical and chemical restraints (an update). Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 38 (2):437–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ienca, M., and R. Andorno. 2017. Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (1):5. doi:10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., and P. F. Levin. 1972. Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21 (3):384–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Commission Standards on Restraint and Seclusion. 2011. https://www.crisisprevention.com/CPI/media/Media/Resources/alignments/Joint-Commission-Restraint-Seclusion-Alignment-2013.pdf. (accessed February 23, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Levy, N. 2019. Nudge, nudge, wink, wink: Nudging is giving reasons. Ergo 6:281–302.
   Google Scholar
• Malviya, S., T. Voepel‐Lewis, A. R. Tait, S. Merkel, K. Tremper, and N. Naughton. 2002. Depth of sedation in children undergoing computed tomography: Validity and reliability of the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). British Journal of Anaesthesia 88 (2):241–5. doi:10.1093/bja/88.2.241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancuso, C. E., M. G. Tanzi, and M. Gabay. 2004. Paradoxical reactions to benzodiazepines: Literature review and treatment options. Pharmacotherapy 24 (9):1177–85. doi:10.1592/phco.24.13.1177.38089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy-Jones, S. 2019. The autonomous mind: The right to freedom of thought in the twenty-first century. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2:19. doi:10.3389/frai.2019.00019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Navin, M. C., and J. A. Wasserman. 2019. Capacity for preferences and pediatric assent implications for pediatric practice. The Hastings Center Report 49 (1):43–51. doi:10.1002/hast.980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Némethy, M., L. Paroli, P. G. Williams-Russo, and T. J. J. Blanck. 2002. Assessing sedation with regional anesthesia: Inter-rater agreement on a modified Wilson Sedation Scale. Anesthesia and Analgesia 94 (3):723–8; table of contents.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noggle, R. 2022. The Ethics of Manipulation. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/ethics-manipulation/.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. 2008. The basic liberties. In The legacy of H.L.A. hart: Legal, political, and moral philosophy, 201–224 M. H. Kramer, ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasheed, A. M., M. F. Amirah, M. Abdallah, P. J. Parameaswari, M. Issa, and A. Alharthy. 2019. Ramsay Sedation Scale and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale: A cross-sectional study. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing 38 (2):90–5. doi:10.1097/DCC.0000000000000346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryberg, J. 2017. Neuroscience, mind reading and mental privacy. Res Publica 23 (2):197–211. doi:10.1007/s11158-016-9343-0.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. T. 2019. Getting real on rationality—Behavioral science, nudging, and public policy. Ethics 129 (4):511–43. doi:10.1086/702970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2008. Framing moral intuitions. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Vol. 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity, 47–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. 2013. Cognitive penetrability of perception. Philosophy Compass 8 (7):646–63. doi:10.1111/phc3.12043.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., and C. R. Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New York, NY: Penguin Publishing Group. https://books.google.com/books?id=bt6sPxiYdfkC.
   Google Scholar
• Treggiari, M. M., J.-A. Romand, N. D. Yanez, S. A. Deem, J. Goldberg, L. Hudson, C.-P. Heidegger, and N. S. Weiss. 2009. Randomized trial of light versus deep sedation on mental health after critical illness*. Critical Care Medicine 37 (9). https://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Fulltext/2009/09000/Randomized_trial_of_light_versus_deep_sedation_on.5.aspx.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, New Series 211 (4481):453–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, J. A., and M. C. Navin. 2018. Capacity for preferences: Respecting patients with compromised decision-making. The Hastings Center Report 48 (3):31–9. doi:10.1002/hast.853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wormser, G. P., F. Strle, and E. D. Shapiro. 2019. Is doxycycline appropriate for routine treatment of young children with erythema migrans? The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 38 (11):1113–4. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000002453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar