https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7532-6086
REFERENCES
- Dunér, A., and E. Olin. 2018. Personal assistance from family members as an unwanted situation, an optimal solution or an additional good? The Swedish example. Disability & Society 33 (1):1–19. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1375900.
- Hausman, D. M., and B. Welch. 2010. Debate: To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1):123–36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00351.x.
- McCarthy, A. M., and D. Howard. 2023. Supported decision-making: Non-domination rather than mental prosthesis. AJOB Neuroscience 14 (3):227–237. doi:10.1080/21507740.2021.1973147.
- Morris, J. 1993. Independent lives? London: Macmillan Education UK.
- O’Shea, T. 2018. Disability and domination: Lessons from republican political philosophy. Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (1):133–48.
- Schmidt, A. T. 2017. The power to nudge. American Political Science Review 111 (2):404–17. doi:10.1017/S0003055417000028.
- Shakespeare, T. 2013. Disability rights and wrongs revisited. London: Routledge.
- Silvers, A., and L. P. Francis. 2009. Thinking about the good: Reconfiguring liberal metaphysics (or not) for people with cognitive disabilities. Metaphilosophy 40 (3–4):475–98. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01602.x.
- Sunstein, C. R., and R. H. Thaler. 2006. Preferences, paternalism, and liberty. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 59 (September):233–64. doi:10.1017/S135824610000953X.
- Wood, A. W. 2014. Coercion, manipulation, exploitation. In Manipulation: Theory and practice, ed. C. Coons and M. Weber, 17–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.