REFERENCES
- Darwall, S. 1977. Two kinds of respect. Ethics 88 (1):36–49. doi: 10.1086/292054.
- Herrera-Ferrá, K., J. M. Muñoz, H. Nicolini, G. Saruwatari Zavala, and V. M. Martínez Bullé Goyri. 2023. Contextual and cultural perspectives on neurorights: Reflections toward an international consensus. AJOB Neuroscience 14 (4):360–368. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2022.2048722.
- Ienca, M., and R. Andorno. 2017. Towards a new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1.
- Jecker, N. S. 2020. Ending midlife bias. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Jecker, N. S., C. A. Atiure, and M. O. Ajei. 2022a. The moral standing of social robots: Untapped insights from Africa. Philosophy & Technology 35 (2):1–22. doi: 10.1007/s13347-022-00531-5.
- Jecker, N. S., C. A. Atiure, and M. O. Ajei. 2022b. Two steps forward: An African relational account of moral standing. Philosophy & Technology 35 (2). doi: 10.1007/s13347-022-00533-3.
- Jecker, N. S., and A. Ko. 2022a. The unique and practical advantages of applying a capability approach to brain computer interface. Philosophy & Technology 35 (4):101. doi: 10.1007/s13347-022-00597-1.
- Jecker, N. S., and A. Ko. 2022b. Brain-computer interfaces could allow soldiers to control weapons with their thoughts and turn off their fear—But the ethics of neurotechnology lags behind the science. The Conversation. December 2. https://theconversation.com/brain-computer-interfaces-could-allow-soldiers-to-control-weapons-with-their-thoughts-and-turn-off-their-fear-but-the-ethics-of-neurotechnology-lags-behind-the-science-194017.
- Jecker, N. S., and A. Ko. 2023. Justifying a capability approach to brain computer interface. Philosophy & Technology 36 (1):4. doi: 10.1007/s13347-022-00603-6.
- Jecker, N. S., and E. Nakazawa. 2022. Bridging East-West differences in ethics guidance for AI and robots. AI 3 (3):764–77. doi: 10.3390/ai3030045.
- Roebyns, I. 2006. The capability approach in practice. Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (3):351–76.