Advanced search
Publication Cover
AJOB Neuroscience Volume 14, 2023 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
79
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

How Cognitive Enhancement Could Impact Brain Drain – Hence Social Mobility Globally

Mirko Daniel GarasicRoma Tre UniversityCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4133-8564View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 352-354 | Published online: 19 Oct 2023

REFERENCES

  • Dasgupta, J., G. Lockwood Estrin, J. Summers, and I. Singh. 2023. Cognitive enhancement and social mobility: Skepticism from India. AJOB Neuroscience 14 (4):341–351. doi:10.1080/21507740.2022.2048723.
  • Garasic, M. D., and A. Lavazza. 2016. Moral and social reasons to acknowledge the use of cognitive enhancers in competitive-selective contexts. BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0102-8.
  • Garasic, M. D., and A. Lavazza. 2015. Performance enhancement in the workplace: Why and when healthy individuals should disclose their reliance on pharmaceutical cognitive enhancers. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 9:13. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00013.
  • Jwa, A. S. 2021. Enhancing the developing brain: Tensions between parent, child, and state in the United States. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 8 (1):lsab017. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsab017.
  • Karan, A., D. DeUgarte, and M. Barry. 2016. Medical “Brain Drain” and Health Care Worker Shortages: How Should International Training Programs Respond? AMA Journal of Ethics 18 (7):665–75.
  • Lavazza, A., and M. D. Garasic. 2017. How non-invasive brain stimulation might invade our sphere of justice. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement 1 (1):31–8. doi: 10.1007/s41465-017-0008-5.
  • Loewe, D. 2016. Cognitive enhancement and the leveling of the playing field: The Case of Latin America. In Cognitive Enhancement: Ethical and Policy Implications in International Perspectives, edited by Fabrice Jotterand, and Veljko Dubljevic, 219–236. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Santoni de Sio, F., P. Robichaud, and N. Vincent. 2014. Who Should Enhance? Conceptual and Normative Dimensions of Cognitive Enhancement. Humana Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (26):179–97.
  • Sloat, S. 2014, May 1. Ivy Leaguers Twice as Likely as Other Students to Use Drugs as Study Aids. The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/article/117599/ivy-leaguers-twice-likely-use-drugs-study-aids.
  • Ward, A. F., K. Duke, A. Gneezy, and M. W. Bos. 2017. Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 2 (2):140–54. doi: 10.1086/691462.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.