1,354
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Bird communities in forested and human-modified landscapes of Central Panama: a baseline survey for a native species reforestation treatment

, &
Pages 281-289 | Published online: 08 Oct 2013

References

  • Bray JR, Curtis JT. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr. 27:325–349.
  • Chao A. 2005. Species richness estimation. Encyclopedia Stat Sci. 12:7907–7916.
  • Chazdon RL, Peres CA, Dent D, Sheil D, Lugo AE, Lamb D, Stork NE, Miller SE. 2009. The potential for species conservation in tropical secondary forests. Conserv Biol [Internet]. 23:1406–1417. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01338.x. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01338.x
  • Clarke K. 1993. Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol. 18:117–143.
  • Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J. 2004. Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology. 85:2717–2727. Available from <Go to ISI>://000224844700011.
  • Connell JH. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs - high diversity of trees and corals is maintained only in a non-equilibrium state. Science. 199:1302–1310. Available from <Go to ISI>://A1978EQ62200009. doi:10.1126/Science.199.4335.1302
  • Estrada A, Cammarano P, Coates-Estrada R. 2000. Bird species richness in vegetation fences and in strips of residual rain forest vegetation at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biodiversity Conserv. 9:1399–1416. Available from <Go to ISI>://000089974900004.
  • Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R. 2005. Diversity of Neotropical migratory landbird species assemblages in forest fragments and man-made vegetation in Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biodiversity Conserv. 14:1719–1734. Available from <Go to ISI>://000229935300009.
  • Etterson MA, Niemi GJ, Danz NP. 2009. Estimating the effects of detection heterogeneity and overdispersion on trends estimated from avian point counts. Ecol Appl. 19:2049–2066.
  • Faria D, Laps RR, Baumgarten J, Cetra M. 2006. Bat and bird assemblages from forests and shade cacao plantations in two contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic Forest of southern Bahia, Brazil. Biodiversity Conserv. 15:587–612. Available from <Go to ISI>://000235489200003.
  • Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett. 4:379–391.
  • Graham CH, Blake JG. 2001. Influence of patch- and landscape-level factors on bird assemblages in a fragmented tropical landscape. Ecol Appl. 11:1709–1721. Available from <Go to ISI>://000172456700012. doi:10.2307/3061090
  • Greenberg R, Bichier P, Angon AC, Reitsma R. 1997. Bird populations in shade and sun coffee plantations in central Guatemala. Conserv Biol. 11:448–459. Available from <Go to ISI>://A1997WV11500027.
  • Greenberg R, Salgado-Ortiz J, Macias-Caballero C. 1994. Aggressive competition for critical resources among migratory birds in the Neotropics. Bird Conserv Int. 4:115–127.
  • Guevara S, Purata SE, Maarel E. 1986. The role of remnant forest trees in tropical secondary succession. Plant Ecol. 66:77–84.
  • Hall JS, Ashton MS, Garen EJ, Jose S. 2011. The ecology and ecosystem services of native trees: implications for reforestation and land restoration in Mesoamerica. Forest Ecol Manag [Internet]. 261:1553–1557. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112710007115. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.011
  • Hammer Ø, Harper DA, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeont Electronica. 4:9.
  • Harvey CA, Medina A, Sánchez DM, Vílchez S, Hernández B, Saenz JC, Maes JM, Casanoves F, Sinclair FL. 2006. Patterns of animal diversity in different forms of tree cover in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Appl [Internet]. 16:1986–1999. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1986:POADID]2.0.CO;2. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1986:poadid]2.0.co;2
  • Hughes JB, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR. 2002. Conservation of tropical forest birds in countryside habitats. Ecol Lett [Internet]. 5:121–129. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00294.x. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00294.x
  • Ibáñez R, Condit R, Angehr G, Aguilar S, García T, Martínez R, Sanjur A, Stallard R, Wright SJ, Rand AS, Heckadon S. 2002. An ecosystem report on the Panama Canal: monitoring the status of the forest communities and the watershed. Environ Monit Assess. 80:65–99.
  • Kaimowitz D. 1996. Livestock and deforestation in Central America in the 1980s and 1990s: a policy perspective. Jakarta: Center for International Forestry Research.
  • Karp DS, Ziv G, Zook J, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC. 2011. Resilience and stability in bird guilds across tropical countryside. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 108:21134–21139.
  • Karr JR. 1976. On the relative abundance of migrants from the north temperate zone in tropical habitats. Wilson Bull. 88:433–458.
  • Leon MC, Harvey CA. 2006. Live fences and landscape connectivity in a neotropical agricultural landscape. Agroforest Syst. 68:15–26.
  • Lindell CA, Cole RJ, Holl KD, Zahawi RA. 2011. Migratory bird species in young tropical forest restoration sites: effects of vegetation height, planting design, and season. Bird Conserv Int. 1:1–12.
  • Marsden SJ, Symes CT. 2008. Bird richness and composition along an agricultural gradient in New Guinea: the influence of land use, habitat heterogeneity and proximity to intact forest. Aust Ecol. 33:784–793.
  • Martin TE. 1985. Selection of second-growth woodlands by frugivorous migrating birds in Panama: an effect of fruit size and plant density? J Trop Ecol. 1:157–170.
  • Milder JC, DeClerck FAJ, Sanfiorenzo A, Sánchez DM, Tobar DE, Zuckerberg B. 2010. Effects of farm and landscape management on bird and butterfly conservation in western Honduras. Ecosphere [Internet]. 1:art2. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES10-00003.1. doi:10.1890/es10-00003.1
  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Washington (DC): World Resources Institute.
  • Petit LJ, Petit DR. 2003. Evaluating the importance of human-modified lands for Neotropical bird conservation. Conserv Biol [Internet]. 17:687–694. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.00124.x. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.00124.x
  • Petit LJ, Petit DR, Christian DG, Powell HDW. 1999. Bird communities of natural and modified habitats in Panama. Ecography. 22:292–304.
  • Petit DR, Petit LJ, Saab VA, Martin TE. 1995. Fixed-radius point counts in forests: factors influencing effectiveness and efficiency. Monitoring bird populations by point counts United States Forest Service, General Technical Report PSW-GTR-149.49-56. Washington (DC): United States Forest Service.
  • Reid JL, Harris JBC, Zahawi RA. 2012. Avian habitat preference in tropical forest restoration in Southern Costa Rica. Biotropica. 44:350–359. Available from <Go to ISI>://000303496500010. doi:10.1111/J.1744–7429.2011.00814.X
  • Reitsma R, Parrish JD, McLarney W. 2001. The role of cacao plantations in maintaining forest avian diversity in southeastern Costa Rica. Agrofores Syst. 53:185–193.
  • Ridgely RS, Gwynne JA. 1989. A guide to the birds of Panama. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
  • Robinson WD, Brawn JD, Robinson SK. 2000. Forest bird community structure in central Panama: influence of spatial scale and biogeography. Ecol Monogr. 70:209–235. Available from <Go to ISI>://000086984100002.
  • Scales BR, Marsden SJ. 2008. Biodiversity in small-scale tropical agroforests: a review of species richness and abundance shifts and the factors influencing them. Environ Conserv. 35:160–172.
  • Sekercioglu CH. 2006. Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends Ecol Evol [Internet]. 21:464–471. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534706001595. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.007
  • Stallard RF, Ogden FL, Elsenbeer H, Hall J. 2010. Panama Canal watershed experiment: Agua Salud Project. Water Res Impact. 12:17–20.
  • Thomas L, Buckland ST, Rexstad EA, Laake JL, Strindberg S, Hedley SL, Bishop JRB, Marques TA, Burnham KP. 2010. Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. J Appl Ecol. 47:5–14. Available from <Go to ISI>://000274191300002. doi:10.1111/J.1365–2664.2009.01737.X
  • Van Bael SA, Bichier P, Ochoa I, Greenberg R. 2007. Bird diversity in cacao farms and forest fragments of western Panama. Biodiversity Conserv. 16:2245–2256. Available from <Go to ISI>://000247932200002.
  • van Breugel M, Hall JS, Craven DJ, Gregoire TG, Park A, Dent DH, Wishnie MH, Mariscal E, Deago J, Ibarra D, et al. 2011. Early growth and survival of 49 tropical tree species across sites differing in soil fertility and rainfall in Panama. Forest Ecol Manag [Internet]. 261:1580–1589. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112710004780. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.019
  • Waltert M, Bobo KS, Sainge NM, Fermon H, Mühlenberg M. 2005. From forest to farmland: habitat effects on Afrotropical forest bird diversity. Ecol Appl. 15:1351–1366.
  • Waltert M, Mardiastuti A, Muhlenberg M. 2004. Effects of land use on bird species richness in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Conserv Biol. 18:1339–1346. Available from <Go to ISI>://000224071800019. doi:10.1111/J.1523–1739.2004.00127.X
  • Whelan CJ, Wenny DG, Marquis RJ. 2008. Ecosystem services provided by birds. Ann NY Acad Sci [Internet]. 1134:25–60. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1439.003. doi:10.1196/annals.1439.003
  • Wright SJ, Muller-Landau HC. 2006. The future of tropical forest species. Biotropica [Internet]. 38:287–301. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00154.x. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00154.x
  • Wright SJ, Samaniego MJ. 2008. Historical, demographic, and economic correlates of land-use change in the Republic of Panama. Ecol Soc. 13:17.
  • Wunderle J, Latta S. 1996. Avian abundance in sun and shade coffee plantations and remnant pine forest in the Cordillera Central, Dominican Republic. Ornithol Neotrop. 7:19–34.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.