Assessing urban tree carbon storage and sequestration in Bolzano, Italy

References

• Aguaron E, McPherson EG. 2012. Comparison of methods for estimating carbon dioxide storage by Sacramento’s urban forest. In: Lal R, Augustin B, editors. Carbon sequestration urban ecosyst. New York (NY): Springer; p. 43–71.
   Google Scholar
• Akbari H, Pomerantz M, Taha H. 2001. Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Sol Energy. 70:295–310. doi:10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00089-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett J. 2003. Security and climate change. Glob Environ Chang. 13:7–17. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00080-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basuki TM, van Laake PE, Skidmore AK, Hussin YA. 2009. Allometric equations for estimating the above-ground biomass in tropical lowland Dipterocarp forests. For Ecol Manage. 257:1684–1694. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonatti M. 2008. Il clima di Bolzano nell’ era di Internet [Internet]. [cited 2012 Dec 10]. Available from: http://www.marcobonatti.it/nuovo/scarica/CLIMABZ_nuovo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brack CL. 2002. Pollution mitigation and carbon sequestration by an urban forest. Environ Pollut. 116(Suppl):S195–S200. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00251-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bühler O, Kristoffersen P, Larsen SU. 2007. Growth of street trees in Copenhagen with emphasis on the effect of different establishment concepts. Arboric Urban For. 33:330–337.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce RGH. 1968. Biomass and production of trees in a mixed deciduous woodland: I. girth and height as parameters for the estimation of tree dry weight. J Ecol. 56:759–775. doi:10.2307/2258105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner GA. 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia. 111:1–11. doi:10.1007/s004420050201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comune di Bolzano. 2012. Censimento della popolazione 2011 [Internet]. [cited 2012 Sep 1]. Available from: http://www.comune.bolzano.it/context.jsp?ID_LINK=3980&area=154
   Google Scholar
• Crema S. 2008. Urban forestry e stima del carbonio: analisi di linee guida e calcolo in zona urbana come applicazione ed opportunità per l’ università di Padova. Padova: Università degli studi di Padova.
   Google Scholar
• Davies ZG, Edmondson JL, Heinemeyer A, Leake JR, Gaston KJ. 2011. Mapping an urban ecosystem service: quantifying above-ground carbon storage at a city-wide scale. J Appl Ecol. 48:1125–1134. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02021.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs C, Escobedo FJ, Zipperer WC. 2011. A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landsc Urban Plan. 99:196–206. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobedo F, Chappelka A, Staudhammer C, Mayer H. 2013. Evaluating the use of i-Tree ECO in the Southeastern US. Florida Arborist. 16:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Escobedo F, Varela S, Zhao M, Wagner JE, Zipperer W. 2010. Analyzing the efficacy of subtropical urban forests in offsetting carbon emissions from cities. Environ Sci Policy. 13:362–372. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobedo FJ, Kroeger T, Wagner JE. 2011. Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ Pollut. 159:2078–2087. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrini F, Fini A. 2011. Sustainable management techniques for trees in the urban areas. J Biodivers Ecol Sci. 1:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming LE. 1988. Growth estimates of street trees in central New Jersey [dissertation]. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science. 319:756–760. doi:10.1126/science.1150195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenauer H, Monserud RA. 1997. Biased predictions for tree height increment models developed from smoothed ‘data’. Ecol Modell. 98:13–22. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(96)01933-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry M, Bombelli A, Trotta C, Alessandrini A, Birigazzi L, Sola G, Vieilledent G, Santenoise P, Longuetaud F, Valentini R. et al., 2013. GlobAllomeTree: international platform for tree allometric equations to support volume, biomass and carbon assessment. iForest – Biogeosci For. 6:326–330. doi:10.3832/ifor0901-006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutyra LR, Yoon B, Alberti M. 2011. Terrestrial carbon stocks across a gradient of urbanization: a study of the Seattle, WA region. Glob Chang Biol. 17:783–797. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02238.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iakovoglou V, Thompson J, Burras L. 2002. Characteristics of trees according to community population level and by land use in the U.S. midwest. J Arboric. 28:59–69.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007 – the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC (climate change 2007). In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, editors. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. Available from: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/contents.html
   Google Scholar
• ISPRA. 2012. Rapporto Rifiuti Urbani 2012. Roma (Italy): Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale.
   Google Scholar
• i-Tree. 2012a. i-Tree reports [Internet]. [cited 2012 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.itreetools.org/resources/reports.php
   Google Scholar
• i-Tree. 2012b. i-Tree applications [Internet]. [cited 2012 Sep 5]. Available from: http://www.itreetools.org/applications.php
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA. 2003. National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci. 49:12–35.
   Google Scholar
• Jo H, McPherson GE. 1995. Carbon storage and flux in urban residential greenspace. J Environ Manage. 45:109–133. doi:10.1006/jema.1995.0062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiannis IC, Soldatos PG. 2010. Estimation of critical CO2 values when planning the power source in water desalination: the case of the small Aegean islands. Energy Policy. 38:3891–3897. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laar A, van Akça A. 2007. Forest mensuration. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence AB, Escobedo FJ, Staudhammer CL, Zipperer W. 2012. Analyzing growth and mortality in a subtropical urban forest ecosystem. Landsc Urban Plan. 104:85–94. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Li X. 2012. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban forests in Shenyang, China. Urban For Urban Greening. 11:121–128. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2011.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, Liquete C, Vihervaara P, Schägner JP, Grizzetti B, Drakou EG, La Notte A, Zulian G. et al. 2012. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosyst Serv. 1:31–39. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin NA, Chappelka AH, Loewenstein EF, Keever GJ. 2012. Comparison of carbon storage, carbon sequestration, and air pollution removal by protected and maintained urban forests in Alabama, USA. Int J Biodivers Sci, Ecosyst Serv Manag. 8:265–272. doi:10.1080/21513732.2012.712550.
   Google Scholar
• Marziliano PA, Lafortezza R, Colangelo G, Davies C, Sanesi G. 2013. Structural diversity and height growth models in urban forest plantations: a case-study in northern Italy. Urban For Urban Greening. 12:246–254. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2013.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHale MR, Burke IC, Lefsky MA, Peper PJ, McPherson EG. 2009. Urban forest biomass estimates: is it important to use allometric relationships developed specifically for urban trees? Urban Ecosyst. 12:95–113. doi:10.1007/s11252-009-0081-3.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson EG. 2010. Selecting reference cities for i-Tree streets. Arboric Urban For. 36:230–240.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson EG, Peper PJ. 2012. Urban tree growth modeling. Arboric Urban For. 38:172–180.
   Google Scholar
• Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R. 2006. Biomass equations for European trees: addendum. Silva Fenn. 40:763–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natural England. 2013. Green infrastructure – valuation tools assessment. Exeter (UK): Natural England. (Natural England Commissioned Report NECR126.)
   Google Scholar
• Nowak DJ. 1994. Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Chicago’s urban forest. In: McPherson EG, Nowak DJ, Rowntree R, editors. Chicago’s urban for ecosyst results Chicago urban for clim proj gen tech rep NE-186. Radnor: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak DJ, Crane DE. 2000. The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) model: quantifying urban forest structure and functions. In: Hansen M, Burk T, editors. Integr tools Nat Resour Invent 21st Century; Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference. St. Paul (MN): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station; p. 714–720.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak DJ, Crane DE. 2002. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ Pollut. 116:381–389. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00214-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Hoehn RE, Walton JT, Bond J. 2008. A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboric Urban For. 34:347–358.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Ibarra M. 2002. Brooklyn’s urban forest. Newtown Square (PA): Northeastern Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Borough of Brooklyn. (General Technical Report NE-290.)
   Google Scholar
• Nowak DJ, Kuroda M, Crane DE. 2004. Tree mortality rates and tree population projections in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Urban For Urban Greening. 2:139–147. doi:10.1078/1618-8667-00030.
   Google Scholar
• Paoletti E, Bardelli T, Giovannini G, Pecchioli L. 2011. Air quality impact of an urban park over time. Procedia Environ Sci. 4:10–16. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2011.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Peper PJ, McPherson EG. 1998. Comparision of four foliar and woody biomass estimation methods applied to open-grown deciduous trees. J Arboric. 24:191–199.
   Google Scholar
• Piano Urbanistico Comunale. 2012. PUC – Piano Urbanistico Comunale [Internet]. [cited 2012 Dec 5]. Available from: http://www.comune.bolzano.it/urb_context02.jsp?ID_LINK=1206&page=2&area=74&id_context=8876
   Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H. 2009. Forest growth models. In: Gramm U, Eckey C, editors. For dyn growth yield. Berlin: Springer; p. 423–491.
   Google Scholar
• Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano. 2012. Servizio meteorologico della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano, Dati storici [Internet]. [cited 2012 Dec 20]. Available from: http://www.provincia.bz.it/meteo/dati-storici.asp
   Google Scholar
• Ramdani F. 2013. Urban vegetation mapping from fused hyperspectral image and LiDAR data with application to monitor urban tree heights. J Geogr Inf Syst. 05:404–408.
   Google Scholar
• Roy S, Byrne J, Pickering C. 2012. A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban For Urban Greening. 11:351–363. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Peinado R, Montero G, Del Rio M. 2012. Biomass models to estimate carbon stocks for hardwood tree species. For Syst. 21:42–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo A. 2013. Quantifying and modeling ecosystem services provided by urban greening in cities of the Southern Alps, N Italy [dissertation]. Bologna: University of Bologna.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin Y, Bleahu A, Davies M, Dávila JD, Friel S, De Grandis G, Groce N, Hallal PC, Hamilton I, Howden-Chapman P. et al. 2012. Shaping cities for health: complexity and the planning of urban environments in the 21st century. The Lancet. 379:2079–2108. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60435-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajdak M, Velazquez-Marti B. 2012. Estimation of pruned biomass form dendrometric parameters on urban forests: case study of Sophora japonica. Renew Energy. 47:188–193. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2012.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanesi G, Lafortezza R, Marziliano PA, Ragazzi A, Mariani L. 2007. Assessing the current status of urban forest resources in the context of Parco Nord, Milan, Italy. Landsc Ecol Eng. 3:187–198. doi:10.1007/s11355-007-0031-2.
   Google Scholar
• Semenzato P, Cattaneo D, Dainese M. 2011. Growth prediction for five tree species in an Italian urban forest. Urban For Urban Greening. 10:169–176. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2011.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servizio Giardineria. 2013. Giardineria Comunale di Bolzano [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.comune.bolzano.it/ambiente_context02.jsp?hostmatch=true&ID_LINK=1845&area=69
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha R, Wynne RH. 2012. Estimating biophysical parameters of individual trees in an urban environment using small footprint discrete-return imaging Lidar. Remote Sens. 4:484–508. doi:10.3390/rs4020484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklar F, Ames RG. 1985. Staying alive: street tree survival in the inner city. J Urban Aff. 7:55–66. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.1985.tb00077.x.
   Google Scholar
• Smith WB, Shirley SR. 1984. Diameter growth, survival, and volume estimates for trees in Indiana and Illinois. St. Paul (MN): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. (Res. Pap. NC-257.)
   Google Scholar
• Soares AL, Rego FC, McPherson EG, Simpson JR, Peper PJ, Xiao Q. 2011. Benefits and costs of street trees in Lisbon, Portugal. Urban For Urban Greening. 10:69–78. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2010.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparber W, Fedrizzi R, Avesani S, Exner D, Mahlknecht H. 2010. Calcolo e valutazione delle emissioni di CO2 e definizione di scenari di riduzione per la città di Bolzano. Bolzano: European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano (EURAC).
   Google Scholar
• Stoffberg GH, van Rooyen MW, van der Linde MJ, Groeneveld HT. 2008. Predicting the growth in tree height and crown size of three street tree species in the City of Tshwane, South Africa. Urban For Urban Greening. 7:259–264. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2008.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Strohbach MW, Arnold E, Haase D. 2012. The carbon footprint of urban green space—a life cycle approach. Landsc Urban Plan. 104:220–229. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strohbach MW, Haase D. 2012. Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig, Germany: analysis of patterns in a European city. Landsc Urban Plan. 104:95–104. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabacchi G, Di Cosmo L, Gasparini P. 2011a. Aboveground tree volume and phytomass prediction equations for forest species in Italy. Eur J For Res. 130:911–934. doi:10.1007/s10342-011-0481-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabacchi G, Di Cosmo L, Gasparini P, Morelli S. 2011b. Stima del volume e della fitomassa delle principali specie forestali italiane. Equazioni di previsione, tavole del volume e tavole della fitomassa arborea epigea. Trento: Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura – Unità di Ricerca per il Monitoraggio e la Pianificazione Forestale.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol. 2008. Urban forest project reporting protocol [Internet]. [cited 2012 Nov 15];100. Available from: http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/programs/uesd/uep/UrbanForestProtocol0812081ForBoardApproval.pdf
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2013. PLANTS classification [Internet]. [cited 2013 Nov 22]. Available from: http://plants.usda.gov/classification.html
   Google Scholar
• Wälchli G. 2012. Ökosystemdienstleistungen als ökonomische Strategie? i-Tree: ein Instrument für die Wertermittlung von Stadtbäumen Zusammenfassung [dissertation]. Wädenswil: Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon TK, Park C-W, Lee SJ, Ko S, Kim KN, Son Y, Lee KH, Oh S, Lee W-K, Son Y. 2013. Allometric equations for estimating the aboveground volume of five common urban street tree species in Daegu, Korea. Urban For Urban Greening. 12:344–349. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2013.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata-Cuartas M, Sierra CA, Alleman L. 2012. Probability distribution of allometric coefficients and Bayesian estimation of aboveground tree biomass. For Ecol Manage. 277:173–179. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Kong Z, Escobedo FJ, Gao J. 2010. Impacts of urban forests on offsetting carbon emissions from industrial energy use in Hangzhou, China. J Environ Manage. 91:807–813. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R, Mencuccini M. 2005. Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silvia Fenn Monogr. 4:1–63.
   Google Scholar