Green Water Credits – exploring its potential to enhance ecosystem services by reducing soil erosion in the Upper Tana basin, Kenya

References

• Banwart S. 2011. Save our soils. Nature. 474:151–152. doi:10.1038/474151a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batjes NH. 2012. Projected changes in soil organic carbon stocks upon adoption of recommended soil and water conservation practices in the Upper Tana River catchment, Kenya. Land Degrad Dev. doi:10.1002/ldr.2141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma J. 2010. Implications of the knowledge paradox for soil science. Adv Agron. 106:143–171. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(10)06004-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma J, Droogers P, Sonneveld MPW, Ritsema CJ, Hunink JE, Immerzeel WW, Kauffman S. 2011. Hydropedological insights when considering catchment classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 15:1909–1919. doi:10.5194/hess-15-1909-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma J, Van Altvorst AC, Eweg R, Smeets PJAM, Van Latesteijn HC. 2011. The role of knowledge when studying innovation and the associated wicked sustainability problems in agriculture. Adv Agron. 113:285–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunders JFG, Broerse JEW, Keil F, Pohl C, Scholz RW, Zweekhorst MBM. 2010. How can transdisciplinary research contribute to knowledge democracy? In: ‘t Veld RJ, editor. Knowledge democracy. Consequences for science, politics and media. Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, Chan KM, Costanza R, Elmqvist T, Flint CG, Gobster PH, et al. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 109:8812–8819. doi:10.1073/pnas.1114773109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fries RS, Foley JA, Asner GP. 2004. Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Front Ecol Environ. 2:249–257. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0249:LCBHNA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent DL, Kauffman J. 2007. The spark has jumped the gap: green water credits proof-of-concept. Green Water Credits Report 7. Wageningen: ISRIC-World Soil Information.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkshoorn JA, Macharia PN, Huting JRM, Maingi PM, Njoroge CRK. 2010. Soil and terrain database for the Upper Tana River, Kenya. Green Water Credits report 11. Wageningen: ISRIC-world soil information.
   Google Scholar
• Droogers P, Hunink J, Kauffman S, Van Lynden G. 2011. Costs and benefits of land management options in the Upper Tana, Kenya: using the water evaluation and planning system – WEAP. Green Water Credits report 14. Wageningen: ISRIC – World soil information.
   Google Scholar
• Droogers P, Van Loon A, Immerzeel W. 2008. Quantifying the impact of model inaccuracy in climate change impact assessment studies using an agro-hydrological model. Hydr Earth Syst Sci. 12:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egoh BN, O’Farrell PJ, Charef A, Josephine Gurney L, Koellner T, Nibam Abi H, Egoh M, Willemen L. 2012. An African account of ecosystem service provision: use, threats and policy options for sustainable livelihoods. Ecosyst Serv. 2:71–81. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkenmark M. 1995. Land-water linkages. FAO land and water bulletin 15–16. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agricultural Organization. 1998. World reference base for soil resources. World soil resources reports, 84. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agricultural Organization. 2011. The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow H 1994. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Githui F, Mutua F, Bauwens W. 2009. Estimating the impacts of land-cover change on runoff using the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT): case study of Nzoia catchment, Kenya / Estimation des impacts du changement d’occupation du sol sur l’écoulement à l’aide de SWAT: étude du cas du bassin de Nzoia, Kenya. Hydrol Sci J. 545:899–908. doi:10.1623/hysj.54.5.899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieg-Gran M, Noel S, Porras I. 2006. Lessons learned from environmental services. Green Water Credits report 2. Wageningen: ISRIC.
   Google Scholar
• Guo ZW, Xiao XM, Li DM. 2000. An assessment of ecosystem services: water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production. Ecol Appl. 10:925–936. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0925:AAOESW]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson C, Ranganathan J, Iceland C, Finisdore J. 2012. The corporate ecosystems services review: guidelines for identifying business risks and opportunities arising from ecosystem change. Washington (DC): World Resources Institute, WBCSD and Meridian Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hunink JE, Droogers P, Kauffman S, Mwaniki BM, Bouma J. 2012. Quantitative simulation tools to analyze up- and downstream interactions of soil and water conservation measures: Supporting policy making in the Green Water Credits program of Kenya. J Environ Manage. 111:187–194. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunink JE, Immerzeel WW, Droogers P, Kauffman S, van Lynden G. 2011. Green and blue water resources for the Upper Tana Catchment, Kenya – soil-water management scenarios using the soil and water assessment tool. Green Water Credits report 10. Wageningen: ISRIC.
   Google Scholar
• Hunink JE, Niadas IA, Antonaropoulos P, Droogers P, de Vente J. 2013. Targeting of intervention areas to reduce reservoir sedimentation in the Tana catchment (Kenya) using SWAT. Hydr Sci J. 58:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurni H, Giger M, Meyer K. 2006. Soils on the global agenda. Developing international mechanisms for sustainable land management. Prepared with the support of an international group of specialists of the IASUS Working Group of the International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS). Eurosoil Conference; 2004 Sep 9; Freiburg. Bern (Switzerland): Center for Development and Environment.
   Google Scholar
• JRC-EEA, 2010. The European environment-state and outlook (SOER) [Internet]. EC-Joint Research Center and European Environmental Agency; [cited 2013 Aug 29]. Available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu/soer
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman JH, Mantel S, Dijkshoorn JA. 2004. Applications of regional soil and terrain, and soil management databases for green and blue water resource scenarios. In: Stockholm International Water Institute, editor. Abstracts of the World Water Week. Stockholm: Stockholm International Water Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman JH, Van Lynden GWJ. 2004. Managing the water balance – how farmers determine green and blue water flows in the Save Basin in Zimbabwe. Electronic conference drought resistant soils: optimization of soil moisture for sustainable plant production, Nov 12–Dec 17; FAO, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Kremen C. 2005. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol Lett. 8:468–479. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends: findings of the conditions and trends working group. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N, editors. Millennium ecosystem Assessment. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mantel S, van Engelen VWP. 1999. Assessment of the impact of water erosion on productivity of maize in Kenya: an integrated modelling approach. Land Degrad Dev. 10:577–592. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-145X(199911/12)10:6<577::AID-LDR365>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW. 2002. Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT). Theoretical documentation, version 2000. College Station (TX): Taxes Water Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ojea E. 2010. Classifying ecosystem services for economic evaluation: the case of forest water services. BIOECON Conference, Sep 27–28; Venice.
   Google Scholar
• Pagiola S, Arcenas A, Platais G. 2005. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Dev. 33:237–253. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porras I, Grieg-Gran M, Neves N. 2008. All that glitters: a review of payments for watershed services in developing countries. London: The International Institute for Environment and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer J, Sunderland T, Ghazoul J, Pfund JL, Sheil D, Meijaard E, Venter M, Boedhihartono AG, Day M, Garcia C, et al. 2013. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation and other competing land uses. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 110:8349–8356. doi:10.1073/pnas.1210595110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomers S, Matzdorf B 2013. Payments for ecosystem services: a review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosyst Services. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengberg A, Fredholm S, Eliasson I, Knez I, Saltzman K, Wetterberg O. 2012. Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosyst Services. 2:14–26. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2010. Halving hunger: it can be done. Task force on hunger. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. 2007. Global environmental outlook GEO4-environment for development. Kenya (Nairobi): United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Van Latesteijn H, Andeweg K. 2011. The transforum model: transforming agro innovation toward sustainable development. Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger E, Mc Dermott R, Snyder WM. 2002. Cultivating communities of practice – a guide to managing knowledge. Boston (MA): Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies. 2007. Where the land is greener. In: Liniger H, Critchley W, editors. Case studies and analysis of soil and water conservation initiatives worldwide. WOCAT.
   Google Scholar
• Wunder S. 2005. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. Occasional Paper 42. Jakarta (Indonesia): Center for Intern. Forestry Res. CIFOR.
   Google Scholar