Ecosystem services valuation for enhancing conservation and livelihoods in a sacred landscape of the Indian Himalayas

References

• Ahmed SU, Gotoh K. 2006. Cost-benefit analysis of environmental goods by applying the contingent valuation method. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Anthwal A, Sharma RC, Sharma A. 2006. Sacred groves: traditional way of conserving plant diversity in Garhwal Himalaya, Uttaranchal. J Am Sci. 2:35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson G, Bateman I, Mourato S. 2012. Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity. Oxford Rev Econ Policy. 28:22–47. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grs007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badola R, Hussain SA. 2005. Valuing ecosystem functions: an empirical study on the storm protection function of Bhitarkanika mangrove ecosystem, India. Environ Conserv. 32:85–92. doi:10.1017/S0376892905001967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman IJ, Harwood AR, Mace GM, Watson RT, Abson DJ, Andrews B, Binner A, Crowe A, Day BH, Dugdale S, et al.. 2013. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science. 341:45–50. doi:10.1126/science.1234379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman IJ, Mace GM, Fezzi C, Atkinson G, Turner K. 2011. Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environ Resour Econ. 48:177–218. doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9418-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman IJ, Turner RK. 1992. Evaluation of the environment: the contingent valuation method. Anglia: CSERGE School of Environmental Sciences. University of East.
   Google Scholar
• Binger BR, Copple RF, Hoffman E. 1995. The use of contingent valuation methodology in natural resource damage assessments: legal fact and economic fiction. North-western Univ Law Rev. 89:1029–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisht Y, Sharma RC. 2005. Traditional resource management practices for biodiversity conservation and their significance in Nanda devi biosphere reserve, India. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage. 1:97–111. doi:10.1080/17451590509618084
   Google Scholar
• Boyd J. 2007. Nonmarket benefits of nature: what should be counted in green GDP? Ecol Econ. 61:716–723. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd J, Banzhaf S. 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ. 63:616–626. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF. 2001. Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environ Resour Econ. 19:173–210. doi:10.1023/A:1011128332243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson RT, Hanemann WM. 2005. Contingent valuation. In: Mäler KG, Vincent JR, editors. Handbook of environmental economics. Valuing environmental changes. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.; p. 821–936.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K. M., Shaw, M. R., Cameron, D. R., Underwood, E. C., & Daily, G. C. 2006. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol. 4:2138–2152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra K. 2002. Economic valuation of biodiversity: the case of Keoladeo National Park. In: Kadekodi GK, editor. Environmental economics in practice: selected case studies from India (mimeo). Dharwad: Centre for Multi-disciplinary Development Research.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra K, Kadekodi GK 1998. Natural resource accounting in the Yamuna Basin: accounting for forest resources. New Delhi: Project Report prepared for MoEF.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387:253–260. doi:10.1038/387253a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R, De Groot R, Sutton P, Van Der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environ Change. 26:152–158. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily GC, editor. 1997. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystem. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ. 41:393–408. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De-yong Y, Yao-zhong P, Yan-yan W, LiuXin LJ, Jing Z, Zhong-hua L. 2005. Valuation of ecosystem services for Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province from 2001 to 2003 by remote sensing data. J For Res. 16:223–227. doi:10.1007/BF02856820
   Google Scholar
• Fisher B, Turner RK. 2008. Ecosystem services: classification for valuation. Biol Conserv. 141:1167–1169. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ. 68:643–653. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett L 2007. Attitudinal values towards sacred groves, Southwest Sichuan, China. implications for conservation [ Thesis]. London: Imperial College.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston RJ, Russell M. 2011. An operational structure for clarity in ecosystem service values. Ecol Econ. 70:2243–2249. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi G, Negi GCS. 2011. Quantification and valuation of forest ecosystem services in the western Himalayan region of India. Int J Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Serv Manag. 7:2–11. doi:10.1080/21513732.2011.598134
   Google Scholar
• Kadekodi GK, Ravindranath NH. 1997. Macro-economic analysis of forestry options on carbon sequestration in India. Ecol Econ. 23:201–223. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00580-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosambi DD. 1962. Myth and reality: studies in the formation of Indian culture. Bombay: Popular Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin RI, Rubin DS. 1998. Statistics for management. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Loomis JB. 2000. Can environmental economic valuation techniques aid ecological economics and wildlife conservation? Wildl Soc Bull. 28:52–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace GM, Norris K, Fitter AH. 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol. 27:19–26. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maharana I, Rai SC, Sharma E. 2000. Valuing ecotourism in a sacred lake of the Sikkim Himalaya, India. Environ Conserv. 27:269–277. doi:10.1017/S0376892900000308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra KC, Gokhale Y, Chatterjee S, Srivastava S 2001. Cultural and ecological dimensions of sacred groves in India. Report. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy
   Google Scholar
• Manoharan TR 2000. Natural resource accounting: economic valuation of intangible benefits of forests, research and information system for the non-aligned and other developing countries, RIS Discussion Paper; New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur AS, Sachdeva AS 2003. Towards an economic approach to sustainable forest development. Working Paper Series, Paper No. 2. New Delhi: Perspective Planning Division, Planning Commission, Government of India. Available from: http://www.planningcommission.gov.in/reports/wrkpapers/wrkp_forest.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: our human planet, summary for decision-makers. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell RC, Carson RT. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington (DC): Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Murty MN, Menkhaus M. 1994. Economic aspects of wildlife protection in the developing countries: a case study of Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, India. Delhi: Institute of Economic Growth, Indus Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Nagaraja BC, Sunil KA. 2010. Payment for ecosystems services – a new strategy for biodiversity conservation in India. Carmelight. 7:177–186.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, Fisher B, Green RE, Lehner B, Malcolm TR, Ricketts TH. 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 105:9495–9500. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707823105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo R, Ricketts TH. 2006. Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation. PLoS Biol. 4:2153–2164. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negi CS. 2005. Religion & biodiversity conservation: not a mere analogy. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag. 1:85–96. doi:10.1080/17451590509618083
   Google Scholar
• Negi CS. 2010a. The institution of taboo and the local resource management and conservation surrounding sacred natural sites in Uttarakhand, Central Himalaya. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2:186–195.
   Google Scholar
• Negi CS. 2010b. Traditional culture and biodiversity conservation: examples From Uttarakhand, Central Himalaya. Mt Res Dev. 30:259–265. doi:10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-09-00040.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninan KN, Jyothis S, Babu P, Ramakrishnappa V. 2007. The economics of biodiversity conservation. London: Earthscan Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Panchamukhi PR, Trivedi P, Debi S, Kumar A, Sharma P 2007. Natural resource accounting in Karnataka: a study of land and forestry sectors (excluding mining), final report submitted to the central statistical organization, government of India. Dharwad: Centre for Multi-disciplinary Development Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard JL, Folke C, Gunderson L. 2000. Valuation of ecosystem services in institutional context. Ecosystems. 3:36–40. doi:10.1007/s100210000008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan PS. 1996. Conserving the sacred: from species to landscapes. Nat & Resour. 32:11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan PS, Saxena KG, Chandrashekhar UM. 1998. Conserving the sacred: for biodiversity management. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Michener CD. 2004. Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:12579–12582. doi:10.1073/pnas.0405147101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semwal R, Tewari A, Negi GCS, Thadani R, Phartiyal P. 2007. Valuation of ecosystem services and forest governance: a scoping study from Uttarakhand. Uttarakhand: LEAD India.
   Google Scholar
• Shammin R. 1999. The economic value of the environment: cases from South Asia application of the travel cost method (tcm): a case study of environmental valuation of Dhaka Zoological garden. Dhaka: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Singh SP. 2007. Himalayan forest ecosystem services, incorporating in national accounting. Uttarakhand: Central Himalayan Environment Association (CHEA).
   Google Scholar
• Sinha B. 2011. Ecological analysis of a sacred landscape in Garhwal Himalaya, India: an interdisciplinary study. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha B, Maikhuri RK. 1998. Conservation through ‘socio-cultural-religious practice’ in Garhwal Himalaya: a case study of Hariyali sacred site. In: Ramakrishnan PS, editor. Conserving the sacred for biodiversity management. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishers; p. 289–299.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha B, Ramakrishnan PS, Saxena KG, Maikhuri RK. 2003. The concept of sacred linked to biological resource management in the himalayan culture. In: Ehlers E, editor. Environment across cultures. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Spash CL. 2008. The contingent valuation method: retrospect and prospect. CSIRO Working Paper Series. Canberra: CSIRO. ISSN: 1834-5638.
   Google Scholar
• Sukhdev P. 2009. Costing the earth. Nature. 462:277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner RK, Daily GC. 2008. The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environ Resour Econ. 39:25–35. doi:10.1007/s10640-007-9176-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma M. 2000. Economic valuation of forests of Himachal Pradesh, in Himachal Pradesh forest sector review. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace KJ. 2007. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biol Conserv. 139:235–246. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X 2004. Valuation on use value of biodiversity of Songshan Natural Reserve [ Masters Thesis], Chinese Academy of Forestry (In Chinese with English abstract). Beijing: China Forestry Publishing Press.
   Google Scholar