Editorial

References

• Addo-Fordjour P, Rahmad ZB, Asyraf M. 2013. Impacts of forest management on liana abundance and liana–tree relationships in a tropical forest in Malaysia and implications for conservation. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 9:13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatta LD, van Oort BEH, Rucevska I, Baral H. 2014. Payment for ecosystem services: possible instrument for managing ecosystem services in Nepal. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 10:289–299.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatta LD, van Oort BEH, Stork NE, Baral H. 2015. Ecosystem services and livelihoods in a changing climate: understanding local adaptations in the Upper Koshi, Nepal. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 11:145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Blicharska M, Mikusiński G, Godbole A, Sarnaik J. 2013. Safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services of sacred groves – experiences from northern Western Ghats. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 9:339–346.
   Google Scholar
• Duru M, Theau JP, Martin G. 2015. A methodological framework to facilitate analysis of ecosystem services provided by grassland-based livestock systems. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 11:128–144.
   Google Scholar
• Fu B, Liu Y, Lü Y, He C, Zeng Y, Wu B. 2011. Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China. Ecol Complex. 8:284–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamoun M, Patton B, Hanchi B. 2015. Assessment of vegetation response to grazing management in arid rangelands of southern Tunisia. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 11:106–113.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon LJ, Finlayson CM, Falkenmark M. 2010. Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agric Water Manage. 97:512–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerry AD, Ruckelshaus MH, Arkema KK, Bernhardt JR, Guannel G, Kim C-K, Marsik M, Papenfus M, Toft JE, Verutes G, et al. 2012. Modeling benefits from nature: using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 8:107–121.
   Google Scholar
• Hill W, Byrne J, Pickering C. 2015. The ‘hollow-middle’: why positive community perceptions do not translate into pro-conservation behaviour in El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 11:168–183.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder KH, Newton AC, Cantarello E, Perrella L. 2014. Does landscape-scale conservation management enhance the provision of ecosystem services? Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 10:71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman S, Droogers P, Hunink J, Mwaniki B, Muchena F, Gicheru P, Bindraban P, Onduru D, Cleveringa R, Bouma J. 2014. Green water credits – exploring its potential to enhance ecosystem services by reducing soil erosion in the Upper Tana basin, Kenya. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 10:133–143.
   Google Scholar
• Kikoti I, Mligo C. 2015. Impacts of livestock grazing on plant species composition in Montane forests on the northern slope of Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 11:114–127.
   Google Scholar
• Krause T, Zambonino H. 2013. More than just trees – animal species diversity and participatory forest monitoring in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 9:225–238.
   Google Scholar
• MA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marques MJ, Bienes R, Jiménez L, Pérez-Rodríguez R. 2007. Effect of vegetal cover on runoff and soil erosion under light intensity events. Rainfall simulation over USLE plots. Sci Total Environ. 378:161–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Harms MJ, Balvanera P. 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 8:17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Nagaraja BC, Raj MB, Kavitha A, Somashekar RK. 2011. Impact of rural community harvesting practices on plant biodiversity in Kudremukh National Park, India. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 7:69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Oli BN, Subedi MR. 2015. Effects of management activities on vegetation diversity, dispersion pattern and stand structure of community-managed forest (Shorea robusta) in Nepal. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 11:96–105.
   Google Scholar
• Plant R, Ryan P. 2013. Ecosystem services as a practicable concept for natural resource management: some lessons from Australia. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 9:44–53.
   Google Scholar
• Schnitzer SA, Bongers F. 2002. The ecology of lianas and their role in forests. Trends Ecol Evol. 17:223–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroth G, Laderach P, Dempewolf J, Philpott S, Haggar J, Eakin H, Castillejos T, Garcia Moreno J, Soto Pinto L, Hernandez R, et al. 2009. Towards a climate change adaptation strategy for coffee communities and ecosystems in the Sierra Madre de Chiapas, Mexico. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 14:605–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulp CJE, Alkemade R, Klein Goldewijk K, Petz K. 2012. Mapping ecosystem functions and services in Eastern Europe using global-scale data sets. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 8:156–168.
   Google Scholar
• Sfair JC, Rochelle ALC, van Melis J, Rezende AA, Weiser V, Martins FR. 2015. Theoretical approaches to liana management: a search for a less harmful method. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 11:89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha B, Mishra S. 2015. Ecosystem services valuation for enhancing conservation and livelihoods in a sacred landscape of the Indian Himalayas. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 11:156–167.
   Google Scholar
• Spangenberg JH, Görg C, Truong DT, Tekken V, Bustamante JV, Settele J. 2014. Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 10:40–53.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2011. Global drylands: a UN system-wide response. Geneva: United Nations (UN) Environment Management Group (EMG).
   Google Scholar
• Van Oudenhoven APE, De Groot RS. 2014. Editorial. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 10:85–88.
   Google Scholar
• Villarreal ML, Norman LM, Boykin KG, Wallace CSA. 2013. Biodiversity losses and conservation trade-offs: assessing future urban growth scenarios for a North American trade corridor. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage. 9:90–103.
   Google Scholar