935
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Synergies between biodiversity and timber management - Special Issue Papers

Recovery of plant community functional traits following severe soil perturbation in plantations: a case-study

, , , &
Pages 116-127 | Received 20 Mar 2015, Accepted 21 Jan 2016, Published online: 19 Feb 2016

References

  • Archaux F, Chevalier R, Berthelot A. 2010. Towards practices favourable to plant diversity in hybrid poplar plantations. For Ecol Manage. 259:2410–2417.
  • Atkin OK, Westbeek MHM, Cambridge ML, Lambers HL, Pons TL. 1997. Leaf respiration in light and darkness: A comparison of slow- and fast-growing Poa species. Plant Physiol. 113:961–965.
  • Aubin I, Deshaies O, Cardou F, Sirois L. 2014. Management legacy in the understory of North American mixed boreal regenerating stands. For Ecol Manage. 320:129–137.
  • Aubin I, Messier C, Bouchard A. 2008. Can plantations develop understory biological and physical attributes of naturally regenerated forests? Biol Conserv. 141:2461–2476.
  • Aubin I, Messier C, Gachet S, Lawrence K, McKenney D, Arseneault A, Bell W, De Granpré L, Shipley B, Ricard J-P, Munson AD. 2012. TOPIC – traits of plants in Canada. Sault Ste. Marie, Canada: Natural Resources Canada – Canadian Forest Service.
  • Aubin I, Venier L, Pearce J, Moretti M. 2013. Can a trait-based multi-taxa approach improve our assessment of forest management impact on biodiversity? Biodivers Conserv. 22:2957–2975.
  • Bilodeau-Gauthier S, Paré D, Messier C, Bélanger N. 2011. Juvenile growth of hybrid poplars on acidic boreal soil determined by environmental effects of soil preparation, vegetation control, and fertilization. For Ecol Manage. 261:620–629.
  • Bilodeau-Gauthier S, Paré D, Messier C, Bélanger N. 2013. Root production of hybrid poplars and nitrogen mineralization improve following mounding of boreal Podzols. Can J For Res. 43:1092–1103.
  • Boothroyd-Roberts K, Gagnon D, Truax B. 2013. Can hybrid poplar plantations accelerate the restoration of forest understory attributes on abandoned fields? For Ecol Manage. 287:77–89.
  • Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrotta JA, Quine CP, Sayer J. 2008. Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodivers Conserv. 17:925–951.
  • Carnus JM, Parrotta JA, Brockerhoff EG, Arbez M, Jactel H, Kremer A, Lamb D, O’Hara KL, Walters B. 2006. Planted forests and biodiversity. J For. 104:65–77.
  • Chapin III FS, Walker LR, Fastie CL, Sharma LC. 1994. Mechanisms of primary succession following deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska. Ecol Monogr. 64:149–175.
  • Chen GS, Yang ZJ, Gao R, Xie JS, Guo JF, Huang ZQ, Yang YS. 2013. Carbon storage in a chronosequence of Chinese fir plantations in southern China. For Ecol Manage. 300:68–76.
  • Díaz S, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Cabido M, Cornelissen JHC, Jalili A, Montserrat-Martí G, Grime JP, Zarrinkamar F, Asri Y, et al. 2004. The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. J Veg Sci. 15:295–304.
  • Diochon A, Kellman L, Beltrami H. 2009. Looking deeper: an investigation of soil carbon losses following harvesting from a managed northeastern red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) forest chronosequence. For Ecol Manage. 257:413–420.
  • Dolédec S, Chessel D. 1994. Co-intertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species-environment relationships. Freshwater Biol. 31:277–294.
  • Dray S, Dufour AB. 2007. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J Stat Software. 22:1–20.
  • Enquist BJ, Kerkhoff AJ, Stark SC, Swenson NG, McCarthy MC, Price CA. 2007. A general integrative model for scaling plant growth, carbon flux, and functional trait spectra. Nature. 449:218–222.
  • Environment Canada. 2013. Canadian climate normals 1971–2000. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
  • Figueiredo T, Fonseca F, Martins A. 2011. Soil loss and run-off in young forest stands as affected by site preparation technique: a study in NE Portugal. Eur J For Res. 131:1747–1760.
  • Foster BL, Tilman D. 2000. Dynamic and static views of succession: testing the descriptive power of the chronosequence approach. Plant Ecol. 146:1–10.
  • Garnier E, Cortez J, Billès G, Navas ML, Roumet C, Debussche M, Laurent G, Blanchard A, Aubry D, Bellmann A, et al. 2004. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology. 85:2630–2637.
  • Garnier E, Navas ML. 2013. Diversité fonctionnelle des plantes: Traits des organismes, structure des communautés, propriétés des écosystèmes. Belgique: De Boeck.
  • Grime JP. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat. 111:1169–1194.
  • Haeussler S, Bedford L, Leduc A, Bergeron Y, Kranabetter JM. 2002. Silvicultural disturbance severity and plant communities of the southern Canadian boreal forest. Silva Fenn. 36:307–327.
  • Irwin S, Pedley SM, Coote L, Dietzsch AC, Wilson MW, Oxbrough A, Sweeney O, Moore KM, Martin R, Kelly DL, et al. 2014. The value of plantation forests for plant, invertebrate and bird diversity and the potential for cross-taxon surrogacy. Biodivers Conserv. 23:697–714.
  • Jeffries SB, Wentworth TR, Allen HL. 2010. Long-term effects of establishment practices on plant communities across successive rotations in a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantation. For Ecol Manage. 260:1548–1556.
  • Jobidon R. 1990. Short-term effect of three mechanical site preparation methods on species diversity. Tree Plant Notes. 41:39–42.
  • Jobidon R, Cyr G, Thiffault N. 2004. Plant species diversity and composition along an experimental gradient of northern hardwood abundance in Picea mariana plantations. For Ecol Manage. 198:209–221.
  • Kattge J, Díaz S, Lavorel S, Prentice IC, Leadley P, Bönisch G, Garnier E, Westoby M, Reich PB, Wright IJ, et al. 2011. TRY – a global database of plant traits. Glob Change Biol. 17:2905–2935.
  • Kjær ED, Lobo A, Myking T. 2014. The role of exotic tree species in Nordic forestry. Scand J For Res. 29:323–332.
  • Lavorel S. 2013. Plant functional effects on ecosystem services. J Ecol. 101:4–8.
  • Lavorel S, Garnier E. 2002. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol. 16:545–556.
  • Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Landsberg J, Forbes TDA. 1997. Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol Evol. 12:474–478.
  • Messier C, Bigué B, Bernier L. 2003. Using fast-growing plantations to promote forest ecosystem protection in Canada. Unasylva. 54:59–63.
  • Newmaster SG, Parker WC, Bell FW, Paterson JM. 2007. Effects of forest floor disturbances by mechanical site preparation on floristic diversity in a central Ontario clearcut. For Ecol Manage. 246:196–207.
  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, et al. 2013. vegan: Community ecology package [Internet]. Cran R Project. [cited 2013 Nov 6]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html
  • Oliver CD, Larson BC. 1996. Forest stand dynamics. Updated Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. USA.
  • Paquette A, Messier C. 2010. The role of plantations in managing the world’s forests in the Anthropocene. Front Ecol Environ. 8:27–34.
  • Pawson SM, Brin A, Brockerhoff EG, Lamb D, Payn TW, Paquette A, Parrotta JA. 2013. Plantation forests, climate change and biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv. 22:1203–1227.
  • R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, Available from: http://www.R-project.org/
  • Saucier JP, Robitaille A, Grondin P. 2009. Cadre bioclimatique du Québec. In: Doucet R, editor. Manuel de foresterie. Québec: Ordre des ingénieurs forestiers du Québec; p. 186–205.
  • Savill P, Evans J, Auclair D, Falk J. 1997. Plantation silviculture in Europe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Shiflett SA, Zinnert JC, Young DR. 2014. Conservation of functional traits leads to understory expansion across a chronosequence of understory thicket development. Trees. 28:849–858.
  • Shipley B. 2010. From plant traits to vegetation structure. Chance and selection in the assembly of ecological communities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Simard RR, Sen Tran T. 1993. Evaluating plant-available phosphorus with the electro-ultrafiltration technique. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 57:404–409.
  • Soil Classification Working Group. 1998. The Canadian system of soil classification. 3rd ed. Ottawa: Agriculture and Agri-Foo Canada.
  • Soo T, Tullus A, Tullus H, Roosaluste E. 2009. Floristic diversity responses in young hybrid aspen plantations to land-use history and site preparation treatments. For Ecol Manage. 257:858–867.
  • Soudzilovskaia NA, Elumeeva TG, Onipchenko VG, Shidakov II, Slapagarova FS, Khubiev AB, Tekeev DK, Cornelissen JHC. 2013. Functional traits predict relationship between plant abundance dynamic and long-term climate warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110:18180–18184.
  • Stephens SS, Wagner MR. 2007. Forest plantations and biodiversity: A fresh perspective. J For. 105:307–313.
  • Thiffault N, Roy V. 2011. Living without herbicides in Québec (Canada): historical context, current strategy, research and challenges in forest vegetation management. Eur J For Res. 130:117–133.
  • Tilman D. 1985. The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. Am Nat. 125:827–852.
  • Tomimatsu H, Sasaki T, Kurokawa H, Bridle JR, Fontaine C, Kitano J, Stouffer DB, Vellend M, Bezemer TM, Fukami T, et al. 2013. Sustaining ecosystem functions in a changing world: a call for an integrated approach. J Appl Ecol. 50:1124–1130.
  • Updegraff K, Baughman MJ, Taff SJ. 2004. Environmental benefits of cropland conversion to hybrid poplar: economic and policy considerations. Biomass Bioenergy. 27:411–428.
  • Van Bodegom PM, Douma JC, Witte JPM, Ordonez JC, Bartholomeus RP, Aerts R. 2012. Going beyond limitations of plant functional types when predicting global ecosystem-atmosphere fluxes: exploring the merits of traits-based approaches. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 21:625–636.
  • Van den Brink PJ, Ter Braak CJF. 1999. Principal response curves: analysis of time-dependent multivariate responses of biological community to stress. Environ Toxicol Chem. 18:138–148.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.