Calculativeness and trust: A view from phenomenology

References

• Beckert, J. (2003). Economic sociology and embeddedness: How shall we conceptualize economic action? Journal of Economic Issues, 37, 769–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. R. (2009). The phenomenology of trust: A Schutzian analysis of the social construction of knowledge by gynae-oncology patients. Health, Risk & Society, 11, 391–407. doi:10.1080/13698570903180455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. (2014). Genuine, non-calculative trust with calculative antecedents: Reconsidering Williamson on trust. Journal of Trust Research, 4(1), 44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, E. (2012). Individual and organizational trust in a reciprocal peer coaching context. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20, 427–443. doi:10.1080/13611267.2012.701967
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (2007). Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, H., & MacIntyre, A. (1997). Introduction. In K. E. Løgstrup (Ed.), The ethical demand (pp. xv–xxxviii). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 213–237). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1963). A conception of and experiments with ‘trust’ as a condition of stable concerted actions. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction (pp. 187–238). New York, NY: Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510. doi:10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• James, H. S. Jr., (2014). You can have your trust and calculativeness, too: Uncertainty, trustworthiness and the Williamson thesis. Journal of Trust Research, 4(1), 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Karpik, L. (2014). Trust: Reality or illusion? A critical examination of Williamson. Journal of Trust Research, 4(1), 22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Løgstrup, K. E. (1995). Ophav og omgivelse. [meta fysik 3]. København: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Løgstrup, K. E. (1997). The ethical demand. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Løgstrup, K. E. (2007). Rejoinder. In K. V. K. Niekerk (Ed.), Beyond the ethical demand (pp. 1–48). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power: Two works by Niklas Luhmann. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–107). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Misztal, B. A. (2011). Trust: Acceptance of, precaution against and cause of vulnerability. Comparative Sociology, 10, 358–379. doi:10.1163/156913311X578190
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2001). The nature of trust: From Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology, 35, 403–420.
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2006). Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2013). Process views of trusting and crises. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Ed.), Handbook of advances in trust research (pp. 285–305). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Niekerk, K. V. K. (2007). Introduction. In K. V. K. Niekerk (Ed.), Beyond the ethical demand (pp. ix–xxxi). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens? In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1950). The stranger. In K. H. Wolff (Ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 402–408). Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man; social and rational. Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaitkus, S. (1990). The crisis as a bankruptcy of trust: The fiduciary attitude, human nature and ethical science. International Sociology, 5, 287–298. doi:10.1177/026858090005003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaitkus, S. (1991). How is society possible? Intersubjectivity and the fiduciary attitude as problems of the social group in Mead, Gurwitsch, and Schutz. Dordrecht: Klüwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 36, 453–486. doi:10.1086/467284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53–111.
   Google Scholar