Trust and control in public sector reform: Complementarity and beyond

References

• Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Skjöldberg, K. (2010). Reflexive methodology. New vistas for qualitative research (2nd ed.). Great Britain: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R. (2010). Organizational social capital, structure and performance. Human Relations, 63(5), 583–608. doi: 10.1177/0018726709342931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Brewer, G. A. (2013). Social capital, management capacity and public service performance. Public Management Review, 15(1), 19–42. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2012.662445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, R. (2011). At the crossroads: Future directions in trust research. Journal of Trust Research, 1(2), 203–213. doi: 10.1080/21515581.2011.603513
   Google Scholar
• Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260. doi: 10.1086/292745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijlsma-Frankema, K., & Costa, A. C. (2005). Understanding the trust-control nexus. International Sociology, 20(3), 259–282. doi: 10.1177/0268580905055477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunsdon, B., & Reed, K. (2003). The effects of technical and social conditions on workplace trust. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 12–27. doi: 10.1080/09585190210158493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. (2012a). Reforming for performance and trust: Some reflections. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 5(1), 9–20. doi: 10.2478/v10110-012-0001-4
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. (2012b). Trust and public administration. Administration, 60(1), 91–115.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Su, X. (2015). Public service motivation concepts and theory: A critique. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 700–710. doi: 10.1111/puar.12248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradach, J., & Eccles, R. (1989). Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.000525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley, P. D. (1990). A philosophy of science for the study of individual cases. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 3(3), 299–307. doi: 10.1080/09515079008254261
   Google Scholar
• Chia, R., & Langley, A. (2004). The first organization studies summer workshop: Theorizing process in organizational research (call for papers). Organization Studies, 25(8), 1486–1488.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (Eds.). (2011). Ashgate research companion to new public management. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state: Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. Great Britain: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coletti, A. L., Sedatole, K. L., & Towry, K. L. (2005). The effect of control systems on trust and cooperation in collaborative environments. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 477–500. doi: 10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. C., & Bijlsma-Frankema, K. (2007). Trust and control interrelations – new perspectives on the trust-control nexus. Group & Organization Management, 32(4), 392–406. doi: 10.1177/1059601106293871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22, 251–283. doi: 10.1177/0170840601222004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den danske regering [The Danish Government]. (2011). Et Danmark, der står sammen. Regeringsgrundlag, oktober 2011. Retrieved from http://www.stm.dk/publikationer/Et_Danmark_der_staar_sammen_11/Regeringsgrundlag_okt_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., & Eshuis, J. (2012). The interplay between trust and control in governance processes: A conceptual and empirical investigation. Administration & Society, 44(6), 647–674. doi: 10.1177/0095399711413876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). Trust at risk: Implications for EU policies and institutions. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. (1994). How intrinsic motivation is crowded out and in. Rationality and Society, 6(3), 334–352. doi: 10.1177/1043463194006003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B., & Jegen, R. (2000). Motivation crowding theory: A survey of empirical evidence. CESifo (Working Paper No. 245). Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gargiulo, M., & Ertug, G. (2006). The dark side of trust. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of trust research (pp. 165–186). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gittell, J. H., & Douglass, A. (2012). Relational bureaucracy: Structuring reciprocal relationships into roles. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 709–733. doi: 10.5465/amr.2010.0438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouillart, F., & Hallett, T. (2015). Co-creation in government. Stanford Social Innovation Review, ( Spring Issue), 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Grey, C., & Garsten, C. (2001). Trust, control and post-bureaucracy. Organization Studies, 22(2), 229–250. doi: 10.1177/0170840601222003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernes, T. (2008). Understanding organization as process – theory for a tangled world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hernes, T. (2014). A process theory of organization. Croydon: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015a). A government that worked better and cost less? Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central government. Croydon: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015b). What we have to show for 30 years of new public management: Higher costs, more complaints. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 28(3), 265–267. doi: 10.1111/gove.12150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høyer, H. C., & Mønness, E. (2016). Trust in public institutions – spillover and bandwidth. Journal of Trust Research, 6(2), 151–166. doi: 10.1080/21515581.2016.1156546
   Google Scholar
• Inkpen, A. C., & Currall, S. C. (2004). The co-evolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures. Organization Science, 15, 586–599. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, J. S. (2009). The limits of post-new public management and beyond. Public Administration Review, 69, January–February, 161–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01960.x
   Google Scholar
• Khodyakov, D. (2007). Trust as a process: A three-dimensional approach. Sociology, 41(1), 115–132. doi: 10.1177/0038038507072285
   Google Scholar
• Københavns Kommune [The Municipality of Copenhagen]. (2012). Budget ‘13. København: Københavns Kommune.
   Google Scholar
• Krouwel, A., & Abts, K. (2007). Varieties of euroscepticism and populist mobilization: Transforming attitudes from mild euroscepticism to harsh eurocynicism. Acta Politica, 42(2–3), 252–270. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (2009). Studying processes in and around organizations. In D.A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 409–429). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J. (2010). Knights and knaves return: Public service motivation and the delivery of public services. International Public Management Journal, 13(1), 56–71. doi: 10.1080/10967490903547290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967–985. doi: 10.1093/sf/63.4.967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, C. P., & Sitkin, S. B. (2006). Trust in the balance: How managers integrate trust-building and task control. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of trust research (pp. 87–106). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2005). The trust/control duality. International Sociology, 20(3), 283–305. doi: 10.1177/0268580905055478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2006). Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity. Oxford: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2013). Process views of trusting and crises. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of advances in trust research (pp. 285–305). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017). Trust and public policy: How better governance can help rebuild public trust. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Oomsels, P., & Bouckaert, G. (2014). Studying interorganizational trust in public administration: A conceptual and analytical framework for administrational trust. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(4), 577–604. doi: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576370403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance. Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. doi: 10.1080/14719030600853022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – new public management, governance, and the Neo–Weberian state (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitkin, S. (1995). On the positive effect of legalization on trust. Research on Negotiation in Organisations, 5, 185–217.
   Google Scholar
• Sitkin, S., & George, E. (2005). Managerial trust-building through the use of legitimating formal and informal control mechanisms. International Sociology, 20(3), 307–338. doi: 10.1177/0268580905055479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Six, F. (2013). Trust in regulatory relations: How new insights from trust research improve regulation theory. Public Management Review, 15(2), 163–185. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2012.727461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Six, F., & Sorge, A. (2008). Creating a high-trust organization: An exploration into organizational policies that stimulate interpersonal trust building. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 857–884. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00763.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, D., & Spira, L. F. (2003). Trust and control – symbiotic relationship? Corporate Governance, 3(4), 28–35. doi: 10.1108/14720700310497096
   Google Scholar
• Smets, L. P. M., van Oorschot, K. E., & Langerak, F. (2013). Don’t trust trust: A dynamic approach to controlling supplier involvement in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(6), 1145–1158. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallentin, S., & Thygesen, N. (2016). Trust, control and public sector reform. In S. Jagd & L. Fuglsang (Eds.), Trust, organizations and social interaction: Studying trust as process within and between organizations (pp. 283–299). Croydon: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S. (2011). New public management: Restoring the public trust through creating distrust? In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), Ashgate research companion to new public management (pp. 309–320). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S. (2017). Trust in public administration and public services. In European Commission (Ed.), Trust at risk: Implications for EU policies and institutions ( Chap. 7, pp. 118–128). Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S., Van Roosbroek, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2008). Trust in the public sector: Is there any evidence for a long-term decline? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 47–64. doi: 10.1177/0020852307085733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibel, A. (2007). Formal control and trustworthiness – shall the twain never meet. Group & Organization Management, 32(4), 500–517. doi: 10.1177/1059601106293961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibel, A., Den Hartog, D. N., Gillespie, N., Searle, R., Six, F., & Skinner, D. (2016). How do controls impact employee trust in the employer? Human Resource Management, 55(3), 437–462. doi: 10.1002/hrm.21733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, C., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2014). Putting process (back) in: Research on the internationalization process of the firm. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16, 2–23. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1849–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53–111.
   Google Scholar