209
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Conspiracy mentality differently shapes interpersonal trust when money or digital privacy is at stake

, , , , &
Pages 78-95 | Received 06 Oct 2022, Accepted 10 Aug 2023, Published online: 22 Sep 2023

References

  • Abalakina-paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20(3), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00160
  • Adam-Troian, J., Wagner-Egger, P., Motyl, M., Arciszewski, T., Imhoff, R., Zimmer, F., Klein, O., Babinska, M., Bangerter, A., Bilewicz, M., Blanuša, N., Bovan, K., Bužarovska, R., Cichocka, A., Çelebi, E., Delouvée, S., Douglas, K. M., Dyrendal, A., Gjoneska, B., … Prooijen, J. (2021). Investigating the links between cultural values and belief in conspiracy theories: The key roles of collectivism and masculinity. Political Psychology, 42(4), 597–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12716
  • Alper, S., & Imhoff, R. (2022). Suspecting foul play when it is objectively there: The association of political orientation With general and partisan conspiracy beliefs as a function of corruption levels. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(5), 610–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221113965
  • Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
  • Bartlett, J., & Miller, C. (2010). The power of unreason: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism. Demos.
  • Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027
  • Brandt, M. J., & Crawford, J. T. (2020). Worldview conflict and prejudice. In Advances in experimental social psychology (1st ed., Vol. 61, pp. 1–66). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.09.002
  • Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(April), 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
  • Brülhart, M., & Usunier, J.-C. (2012). Does the trust game measure trust? Economics Letters, 115(1), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.11.039
  • Claassen, R. L., & Ensley, M. J. (2016). Motivated reasoning and yard-sign-stealing partisans: Mine is a likable rogue, yours is a degenerate criminal. Political Behavior, 38(2), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9313-9
  • Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
  • Freeman, D., & Bentall, R. P. (2017). The concomitants of conspiracy concerns. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 52(5), 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1354-4
  • Freeman, D., Waite, F., Rosebrock, L., Petit, A., Causier, C., East, A., Jenner, L., Teale, A.-L., Carr, L., Mulhall, S., Bold, E., & Lambe, S. (2020). Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Psychological Medicine, 52, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001890
  • Frenken, M., & Imhoff, R. (2022). Don’t trust anybody: Conspiracy mentality and the detection of facial trustworthiness cues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3955
  • Gjoneska, B. (2021). Conspiratorial beliefs and cognitive styles: An integrated look on analytic thinking, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning in relation to (Dis)trust in conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(October), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736838
  • Gjoneska, B., Liuzza, M. T., Porciello, G., Caprara, G. V., & Aglioti, S. M. (2019). Bound to the group and blinded by the leader : ideological leader – Follower dynamics in a trust economic game. Royal Society Open Science. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.182023
  • Gkinopoulos, T., & Mari, S. (2023). How exposure to real conspiracy theories motivates collective action and political engagement? Τhe moderating role of primed victimhood and underlying emotional mechanisms in the case of 2018 bushfire in Attica. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12923
  • Imhoff, R., Bertlich, T., & Frenken, M. (2022a). Tearing apart the “evil” twins: A general conspiracy mentality is not the same as specific conspiracy beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101349
  • Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un–)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930
  • Imhoff, R., Dieterle, L., & Lamberty, P. (2021). Resolving the puzzle of conspiracy worldview and political activism: Belief in secret plots decreases normative but increases nonnormative political engagement. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619896491
  • Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2018). How paranoid are conspiracy believers? Toward a more fine-grained understanding of the connect and disconnect between paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 909–926. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2494
  • Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2020a). A bioweapon or a Hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 1110–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620934692
  • Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2020b). Conspiracy beliefs as psycho-political reactions to perceived power. In Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 192–205). Routledge.
  • Imhoff, R., Zimmer, F., Klein, O., António, J. H. C., Babinska, M., Bangerter, A., Bilewicz, M., Blanuša, N., Bovan, K., Bužarovska, R., Cichocka, A., Delouvée, S., Douglas, K. M., Dyrendal, A., Etienne, T., Gjoneska, B., Graf, S., Gualda, E., Hirschberger, G., … van Prooijen, J.-W. (2022b). Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries. Nature Human Behaviour, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01258-7
  • Jolley, D., Mari, S., & Douglas, K. (2020). Consequences of conspiracy theories. In Routledge hanbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 231–241). Routledge.
  • Jolley, D., & Paterson, J. L. (2020). Pylons ablaze: Examining the role of 5G COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and support for violence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 628–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12394
  • Jovančević, A., & Milićević, N. (2020). Optimism-pessimism, conspiracy theories and general trust as factors contributing to COVID-19 related behavior – A cross-cultural study. Personality and Individual Differences, 167(April), 110216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110216
  • Karić, T., & Međedović, J. (2021). COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and containment-related behaviour: The role of political trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 175(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110697
  • Keeley, L. B. (1999). Of conspiracy theories. The Journal of Philosophy, 96(3), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564659
  • Krouwel, A., Kutiyski, Y., van Prooijen, J.-W., Martinsson, J., & Markstedt, E. (2017). Does extreme political ideology predict conspiracy beliefs, economic evaluations and political trust? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(2), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i2.745
  • Krueger, A. M. E. J. I. (2009). The psychology (and economics) of trust. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(6), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.3.441
  • Lamberty, P., & Imhoff, R. (2018). Powerful pharma and its marginalized alternatives? Effects of individual differences in conspiracy mentality on attitudes toward medical approaches. Social Psychology, 49(5), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000347
  • Lantian, A., Wood, M., & Gjoneska, B. (2020). Personality traits, cognitive styles, and worldviews associated with beliefs in conspiracy theories. In Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 155–167). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452734-2_1
  • Mari, S., Gil de Zúñiga, H., Suerdem, A., Hanke, K., Brown, G., Vilar, R., Boer, D., & Bilewicz, M. (2021). Conspiracy theories and institutional trust: Examining the role of uncertainty avoidance and active social media use. Political Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12754
  • Meuer, M., & Imhoff, R. (2021). Believing in hidden plots is associated with decreased behavioral trust: Conspiracy belief as greater sensitivity to social threat or insensitivity towards its absence? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93(November 2020), 104081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104081
  • Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12234
  • Milošević Đorđević, J., Mari, S., Vdović, M., & Milošević, A. (2021). Links between conspiracy beliefs, vaccine knowledge, and trust: Anti-vaccine behavior of Serbian adults. Social Science & Medicine, 277(April), 113930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113930
  • Murphy, J. J., & Stevens, T. H. (2004). Contingent valuation, hypothetical bias, and experimental economics. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 33(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500005761
  • Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
  • Nera, K., & Schöpfer, C. (2022). What is so special about conspiracy theories? Conceptually distinguishing beliefs in conspiracy theories from conspiracy beliefs in psychological research. PsyArXiv.
  • Panasiti, M. S., Violani, C., & Grano, C. (2020). Exploring the relationship between umbilical blood cord donation and the impact of social distance on altruism and trust. International Journal of Psychology, 55(6), 1003–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12664
  • Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer.
  • Pummerer, L., Böhm, R., Lilleholt, L., Winter, K., Zettler, I., & Sassenberg, K. (2021). Conspiracy theories and their societal effects during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211000217
  • Samory, M., & Mitra, T. (2018). The government spies using our webcams. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274421
  • Schepisi, M., Porciello, G., Bufalari, I., Aglioti, S. M., & Panasiti, M. S. (2019). Left threatened by right: Political intergroup bias in the contemporary Italian context. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00026
  • Singmann, H., & Kellen, D. (2019). An introduction to mixed models for experimental psychology. In New methods in cognitive psychology (pp. 4–31). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429318405-2
  • Stuart, A., Bandara, A. K., & Levine, M. (2019). The psychology of privacy in the digital age. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(11), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12507
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
  • van Prooijen, J.-W. (2017). Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3301
  • van Prooijen, J.-W., & Jostmann, N. B. (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1922
  • Zürn, M., & Topolinski, S. (2017). When trust comes easy: Articulatory fluency increases transfers in the trust game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.02.016

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.